• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

My Response to Dr. Weaver’s Latest Article

Jeff Ostrowski · December 1, 2023

N HIS INTRIGUING article of 25 November 2023, Dr. Charles Weaver wrote about what he describes as “a perfect example of the idea that Gregorian melody is influenced by the tonic accent.” Dr. Weaver is a full professor at the famous JUILLIARD SCHOOL OF MUSIC in New York City, where Josef Lhévinne (d. 1944) taught and where Charles Welles Rosen (d. 2012) enrolled when he was just six years old. [Rosen later left to study with Moriz Rosenthal, one of Liszt’s most celebrated pupils.] In the past, my colleague has discussed the chant theories of Abbat Joseph Pothier, appointed by Pope Saint Pius X as president of the Vatican Commission on Gregorian Chant. A few years ago, Dr. Weaver even provided a PPP recording (that is, sung according to “President Pothier’s Principles”). But I’d like to highlight something I haven’t explained sufficiently in the past. In my view, we cannot always assume people’s musical principles remained unchanged their entire life. Obviously, sometimes that is the case. For example, one can listen to certain etudes by Chopin as recorded by Alfred Cortot early in his career. Listening to the same etudes recorded in the 1960s by the elderly Cortot, one discovers his basic conception did not change. But when it comes to plainsong principles unfurled by Pothier during the 1870s and 1880s, can we really assume those were his “final” thoughts on interpretation? Consider the following quote by Dom Prosper Guéranger, written in 1855:

“A comparison of all the manuscripts of the Middle Ages with the Gothic editions of plainchant leads us to the conclusion that in earlier times there was no concern at all for short syllables in ecclesiastical chant, and that there was no problem whatsoever about elaborating them with several notes, often a great number. A fortunate change, which has the force of law today, has modified this usage of the weak penultimates, and it would be a barbarous archaism to adopt this ancient custom in our time.”

I share such quotations to show that people can change their minds! I believe Abbat Guéranger later embraced wholeheartedly the so-called “misplaced melismata.” (Readers probably know that certain editions—e.g. Nivers and the MEDICAEA—brutally truncated Gregorian melismata.) Is it fair to forever bind Dom Guéranger to what he wrote about “barbarous archaisms” in 1855? Similarly, I don’t think it makes sense to assume everything Dom Pothier wrote about interpretation in the 1870s necessarily applies to the EDITIO VATICANA (published 1905-1912).

Pars II
A Challenge For Dr. Weaver

In his article, my colleague says the PROPRIA MISSAE for the 24th Sunday after Pentecost illustrate perfectly “the idea that Gregorian melody is influenced by the tonic accent.” I agree 100% that the PROPRIA (for the 24th Sunday after Pentecost) demonstrate what he claims. My “issue” or “problem” or “question” has to do with the thousands of examples which demonstrate the opposite. Consider the OFFERTORY for the third Sunday of Lent:

I could easily cite thousands more examples like that.

Gregorian composers didn’t have “one way only.” Rather—as century after century rolled on—numerous approaches were adopted. Moreover, the Gregorian composers often looked beyond the accent of each single word to concentrate upon the phrase as a whole.

Pars III
Jeff’s Chant Conundrum

In his article, Dr. Weaver also says: “The intimate connection between the melody and the Latin accentuation is one reason why translating Gregorian chant into modern languages is usually so unsatisfactory.” If every piece of Gregorian Chant were like the propers for the 24th Sunday after Pentecost, I think Dr. Weaver’s assertion vis-à-vis vernacular plainsong would be unassailable. However, as I’ve already explained, the repertoire of Cantus Gregorianus contains thousands of examples—too many to count!—which do the opposite of the examples cited by Dr. Weaver. One cannot thumb through the pages of the GRADUALE ROMANUM without running into a billion examples like this one, from the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost:

There are many instances where the EDITIO VATICANA has melismata of twenty or thirty notes on “unimportant” words like ET, DE, A, IN, CUM, or PRO.

Chant Conundrum • That being said, I have a confession to make. I cannot accept “sloppy” or “unnatural” or “clumsy” adaptations of plainsong into English. In my experience, some of the worst adaptations are done by Anglicans. Consider the following example, taken from the 24th Sunday after Pentecost. Specifically, consider the grotesque emphasis on the word “the” in this 1965 Anglican adaptation:

Jeff’s Preoccupation • I know readers probably think I’ve developed a preoccupation for the official rhythm (i.e. “singing the official edition the way it was intended to be sung by its creators”). Nonetheless, I must point out that the Anglicans who created the PLAINCHANT GRADUAL in English were totally ignorant (!) of the MMV (“melismatic mora vocis”). How can such a thing be? They admit the pitches and notation of their edition are based upon the EDITIO VATICANA, which they refer to as “the typical edition of the Chant of the Latin rite” and “the current official edition of the Latin Graduale.” Yet, throughout their 700+ pages, they demonstrate over and over again they are clueless when it comes to the morae vocis. Notice how they don’t add enough blank space (pink highlights) where the elongations are supposed to be (yellow highlights):

Addendum • Dom Eugène Cardine’s former boss 1 once told me: “In neumatic composition, as in all melismatic pieces, the ancient plain-chant composers often ignored the tonic accent when they were concentrating upon the musical line of the phrase as a whole.” Indeed, Dom Joseph Gajard, writing in the 1950 volume of REVUE GRÉGORIENNE said: “One does not compose in order to set every word to music, but in order to translate into music a single idea expressed in a number of words.” In a musical phrase “each element is a part of the whole and must take its own place in that whole, for instance the word coeli in the SANCTUS of Mass IX, or the word Dómini in the BENEDICTUS of Mass XI, and so forth. Here, the melodic line must be given first place, according to the ancient adage: Musica non subjacet regulis Donati. […] If the function of Gregorian music is to enhance the expressive power of the holy words and even to go further, it becomes clear that it will be under no obligation to be perpetually moulded by them.” How can anyone who has carefully examined plainsong disagree what Dom Gajard has written?

1 For the record, this particular scholar of plainsong was extremely skeptical of the various theories Dom Cardine came up with. Subsequent decades of scholarship seem to have vindicated his concerns—although I suspect some of my colleagues would disagree passionately with my assertion!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Abbat Joseph Pothier, Abbot Joseph Pothier of Solesmes, Dom Eugène Cardine, Dom Joseph Gajard OSB, Gregorian Semiology, melismatic morae vocis, MMV melismatic mora vocis, Sémiologie grégorienne Last Updated: December 1, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 14 September 2025) discusses OFFERTORY ANTIPHONS and contains a wonderful quote by Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Draft Copy (Pamphlet)
    A few days ago, I posted a draft copy of this 12-page pamphlet with citations about the laity’s “full, conscious, and active participation.” Its basic point or message is that choir directors should never feel embarrassed to teach real choral music because Vatican II explicitly ordered them to do that! We’ve received tons of mail regarding that pamphlet, with many excellent suggestions for improvement. Please feel free to chime in!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Entrance Chant” • 23rd (Ordinary Time)
    This coming Sunday, 7 September 2025, is the 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). You can download the “Entrance Chant,” conveniently located at the feasts website. I also recorded a rehearsal video for it (freely available at the same website). The Communion Chant includes gorgeous verses in FAUXBOURDON. I attempted to create a rehearsal video for it, and it’s been posted at the feasts website, called by some: “church music’s best kept secret.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“…it would be a very praiseworthy thing and the correction would be so easy to make that one could accommodate the chant by gradual changes; and through this it would not lose its original form, since it is only through the binding together of many notes put under short syllables that they become long without any good purpose when it would be sufficient to give one note only.”

— Zarlino (1558) anticipating the Medicæa

Recent Posts

  • Do You Recognize This Hymn? Do You Like It?
  • Charlie Kirk’s Fascination with Traditional Catholic Liturgy
  • “Novus Ordo Parish … With Polyphony?” • Is that possible? How specifically does that work?
  • “The Injustice of Traditionis Custodes” • (Private Meetings at the Vatican)
  • New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.