• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Go!” • The Word That Changed My Life Forever

Jeff Ostrowski · March 21, 2023

ORE THAN TWENTY years ago, something happened that changed my life. An opportunity arose for me to study privately with a wonderful priest who—among other things—had served as director of the PONTIFICAL INSTITUTE OF SACRED MUSIC in Rome. At that time of my life, I had only been outside the Midwest once before (when I visited New York for a few days). I went downstairs and described this opportunity to my father. Without a moment’s hesitation, my father immediately said just one word: “Go!” Moreover, he generously provided all the funds necessary to make this journey.

Obsessive Odyssey • At that time, I had already been obsessed with sacred music since high school, but meeting this priest solidified my “church music vocation.” Now is not the time to describe his influence on my life. Nor is it the time for me to discuss the various “church music heroes” this priest worked with during his career: Flor Peeters (d. 1986), Abbat Urbanus Bomm (d. 1982), Josef Cardinal Ratzinger (d. 2022), Dr. Theodore Marier (d. 2001), Monsignor Francis P. Schmitt (d. 1994), Jean Langlais (d. 1991), Monsignor Johannes Overath (d. 2002), Dr. Karl Gustav Fellerer (d. 1984), Gustaaf Frans Nees (d. 1965), Roger Wagner (d. 1992), Monsignor Higinio Anglés (d. 1969), and so forth. Suffice it to say that over the next twenty years I learned a tremendous amount from this priest, who was admired across the globe for his expertise in linguistics, sacred music, and theology.

‘Creature’ Says No? • I once wrote to this priest, describing something about the Catholic Faith that didn’t make sense to me. I think my precise words were: “Such-and-such doesn’t seem fitting.” His email response was succinct: “In the eyes of the creature?” What he was trying to make clear to me was basically this: “Jeff, Divine Revelation does not depend on what you deem to be fitting, what you deem correct, or how you would have chosen to do things.” If we step back and consider his response, he was spot on. The Catholic Faith does not require each person—no matter his training or background—to “ratify” her holy teachings. We are creatures, God is Creator. Period.

Parallel To Sacred Music • I realize our culture rejects the notion that humans are fallible. As Americans, we’re “bred from birth” to think of ourselves as little gods who already know everything and require no correction. Since the 1960s, this belief has contaminated the general view towards sacred music. All of us have constantly been told that church music must meet the “lowest common denominator” test. We are told that it must require no effort whatsoever. We are told that everyone—irrespective of training—deserves to pass judgement on the music at Mass.

Let’s Be Honest • But does this make sense? Surely not! Most Catholics—if they are honest—instinctively know that a choirmaster should be someone who has studied music. In other words, sensible Catholics will ultimately reject the “lowest common denominator” argument (when push comes to shove). But this will require that we stand up—when certain ideologues are spouting nonsense—and forcefully defend the traditional view. Once upon a time, Americans were taught that hard work is required to master something we value. Our country (and church) must once more adopt this view.

Exceedingly Intricate • Bearing in mind what I have said, it should come as no surprise that I’m fine with singing complicated pieces at the Holy Mass (in moderation). Indeed, this is the musical tradition of the Church. According to Vatican II: “The musical tradition of the universal Church is a treasure of inestimable value” which must be “preserved and fostered with great care.” During this year’s SACRED MUSIC SYMPOSIUM, Mæstro Richard J. Clark, choirmaster of Boston’s Cathedral of the Holy Cross, will conduct a piece by Father Cristóbal de Morales (d. 1553) which is—without question—exceedingly intricate.

Brief Description • This five-voice GLORIA is from Morales’ Missa Ave Maris Stella, published in 1544AD. A few months ago, I posted Part 1 of 2. Today, I release Part 2 of 2. Incredibly, in addition to using the plainsong CANTUS FIRMUS (“Ave maris stella”), Father Morales creates a perfect canon between Alto & Tenor, while simultaneously introducing a billion points of imitation:

M Rehearsal videos for each individual voice await you at #41798.

What’s A Canon? • Even some professional musicians don’t understand what a “canon” is. Two major Catholic publishing companies (which shall remain nameless) sell books containing what they call: easy canons for small choirs. The problem is, what they claim to be “canons” are not canons at all. Perhaps unwittingly, these companies are committing fraud. Real canons follow strict rules—and that’s why a true canon is the hardest composition any composer can attempt. (We had to write some at the conservatory, and it was tricky. They must be written backwards.) If you don’t know what a canon is, please watch this video:

M Direct URL link to video: https://ccwatershed.org/41790/

Conclusion • My colleague, Corrinne May, told me I do a poor job of ending my articles. She said I should include some sort of “conclusion”—and she’s right. Therefore, I will now attempt to summarize what I have said above:

(1) We must eradicate the “lowest common denominator” attitude which has infected the Catholic Church (vis-à-vis music) since the 1960s.

(2) Someone hired to lead the music at Mass should possess expertise; i.e. they should have studied sacred music. This is only natural. It’s nothing to be ashamed of.

(3) Since the purpose of sacred music is “the glory of God and the edification of the faithful,” there’s nothing wrong with singing a piece of music which—taken from the treasury of sacred music, which Vatican II said must be “preserved and fostered with great care”—is complicated or intricate. There is no law which says “anything more difficult than a campfire sing-along tune is forbidden at Mass.” (Indeed, the tradition of the Church is the opposite.) Nor is there any law which says the Sistine Chapel ceiling should be erased and replaced with crayon drawings by someone who’s never studied painting.

(4) It is important to remember that—in spite of what certain foolish people claim—there will never be music at Mass “in which everyone can participate.” The fact is, some people are tone-deaf. [For the record, some people also have disabilities which make it impossible for them to speak, or to sing in tune, or to hear sounds properly.] Perhaps someone will object: “Jeff, how can you say that not everyone can sing at Mass? After all, anyone who’s tone-deaf can grunt along.” But grunting along is not the same as singing. I know this may sound harsh, but it’s time we admit the truth. There is no such thing as “a song everybody can sing.”

(5) The GLORIA we are singing at this year’s Symposium comes from “Missa Ave Maris Stella” by Father Cristóbal de Morales. It is an example of an intricate piece of music. [Indeed, I am not aware of any more complicated piece!] We provided rehearsal videos for each individual voice at #46215 and #41798—but most readers will not click on those links, which makes me sad.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Abbat Urbanus Bomm, Cristobal de Morales MISSA AVE MARIS STELLA, Dr Karl Gustav Fellerer, Dr Theodore Marier, Flor Peeters, Jean Langlais, Missa Ave Maris Stella, Monsignor Francis P Schmitt, Monsignor Higinio Angles, Monsignor Johannes Overath, Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music Last Updated: March 21, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The scholar who lives only for his subject is but the fragment of a man; he lives in a shadow-world, mistaking means for ends.”

— Msgr. Ronald Knox (1888-1957)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up