• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
    • “Let the Choir Have a Voice” (Essay)
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

On Mistakes (Part II of II)

Keven Smith · May 27, 2022

CHOIR MEMBER ONCE TOLD ME, “You know what I appreciate about you, Keven? You don’t give dirty looks when people sing wrong notes.” It made me wonder what kinds of choir experiences he’d had before. It also made me think about how we should all respond to mistakes.

In my last article, I analyzed the reasons for mistakes and offered some tips for reducing them. As I mentioned, though, mistakes are inevitable, so we and our singers should learn graceful and charitable ways of responding.

Two Extreme Reactions, and Why They’re Distracting

I’ve noticed two extremes in responding to mistakes: laughing, and beating oneself up. Some singers naturally respond to embarrassment by laughing, but they immediately stifle it and carry on singing. No problem. Unfortunately, I’ve seen singers make a mistake during Mass and then laugh for the next 16 bars. Yuck. That’s worse than any mistake.

And then there’s the singer who beats himself up. Suppose you’re singing through a motet and everything is going fine until one of your tenors comes in a beat early. He hangs his head, slumps his shoulders, and looks disgusted with himself. Even after you’ve finished singing the piece, he continues shaking his head.

This tenor, of course, is preoccupied with his own singing (as is the laugher described above). He’s the baseball player who’s dejected about going 0-for-4 even though his team won 10-1. All the self-flagellation looks like humility, but it can turn into a subtle form of pride: “How could I make a mistake like that? At my level? After all the practice I’ve had?”

We mess up because we have a fallen nature, and it makes us—all of us—do stupid things sometimes. It would be impractical to bar imperfect people from choir. So the next best thing is to turn the church choir into a place where it’s OK to make mistakes as long as we’re doing everything we can to make them rare. To build an environment like this, you need 100 percent buy-in: everyone—especially the director—must forgive others’ mistakes and be completely confident of their forgiveness in return. Everyone must also forgive his own mistakes. The focus on group unity and achievement then becomes so strong that individual mistakes become footnotes.

Thus, whenever we allow our own mistake to change our mood, we put ourselves ahead of the choir. Each singer must realize that he’s irreplaceable, but also anonymous. He’s irreplaceable because a good choir wouldn’t be quite the same without any individual voice. He’s anonymous because if he’s doing things correctly, his voice won’t stick out of the group sound. Because we’re irreplaceable, we must bounce back quickly from mistakes. Because we’re anonymous, we should take heart that many of our errors will go unnoticed.

How Singers Should Respond to Mistakes

The best response a choir member can make after her mistake is to keep soldiering on. It’s helpful if she strikes the chest gently, signaling that she’s aware she made a mistake. This reassures other choir members that they weren’t the ones who caused the problem. It also helps the conductor decide in rehearsals whether to stop the group and rehearse that spot. If I see a very reliable singer strike after making a mistake, I’ll probably go on because I know it was a momentary lapse.

How Choir Directors Should Respond to Mistakes

Whether you’re dealing with a laugher or a self-flagellator, the quick fix is to pull him aside and discuss the need for decorum in the rehearsal room and loft. But I think you’ll get better long-term results by emphasizing the team dynamic in your choir. Remind singers to listen to everything but themselves—from the warmup through the repertoire. Make sure everyone breathes together on entrances. And insist on good eye contact with your singers. Eye contact does much more than help ensure everyone will come in together; it also reminds singers that they’re part of a greater whole.

Now, I will give a pointed look if someone makes a mistake they can still correct. For example, a singer might forget to take a repeat. Or skip a verse. Or continue singing forte when the whole choir has gone piano. A conductor’s gaze often fixes these problems in an instant.

Although I’ve conditioned myself not to give dirty looks, I’m not perfect. I’ll occasionally feel frustrated when I hear a wrong note. This is natural for any hard-working choir director who’s trying to push his choir to higher and higher levels of proficiency. But we must banish these thoughts—or face the consequences. Every time I allow myself to think, “How could someone have sung a C# there? We drilled this in rehearsal!” I’ll soon make a mistake of my own. This always serves as my blunt reminder that choir isn’t about individual performance.

Where Wrong Notes Go to Die

The topic of mistakes came into perspective for me a couple of weeks ago on the Fourth Sunday after Easter (1962 calendar). As we were singing the epic Offertory antiphon Jubilate Deo, I noticed the remarkable energy, nuance, and togetherness of the musical line. Yes, we have the unfair advantage of using scores from the ingenious Graduale Renovatum website. But I give most of the credit to the enthusiasm and team spirit of my singers. I heard mistakes along the way: a missed jump here, an ill-timed change of syllable there. But these imperfections floated by in my peripheral vision. I wouldn’t have traded our spirited, fully engaged rendition for a technically perfect but boring one. 

I’ll leave you with something I told dozens of children at our parish Chant Camp a few years ago. As I reminded them not to get discouraged as they sang that day’s Mass, I quipped, “Don’t worry about mistakes. They’re over in a split-second. And after Mass, your guardian angel will gather them all up in a sack and throw them into that big dumpster in the parking lot.”

I’m not sure my idea has any basis in Scripture or sacred tradition. But I hope it helps flawed choir directors handle the task of leading choirs full of imperfect human beings.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: choir director, directing a choir, Latin Mass, mistakes, Simple Steps To Improve Parish Music, Singing the Mass Last Updated: May 27, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Keven Smith

Keven Smith, music director at St. Stephen the First Martyr, lives in Sacramento with his wife and five musical children.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Music List • (2nd Sunday of Lent)
    Readers have expressed interest in seeing the ORDER OF MUSIC I created for this coming Sunday, which is the 2nd Sunday of Lent (1 March 2026). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. This feast has magnificent propers. Its somber INTROIT is particularly striking—using a haunting tonality—but the COMMUNION with its fauxbourdon verses is also quite remarkable. I encourage all the readers to visit the feasts website, where the Propria Missae may be downloaded completely free of charge.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Like! Like! Like!
    You won’t believe who recently gave us a “like” on the Corpus Christi Watershed FACEBOOK PAGE. Click here (PDF) to see who it was. We were not only sincerely honored, we were utterly flabbergasted. This was truly a resounding endorsement and unmistakable stamp of approval.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Which Mass?
    In 1905, when the Vatican Commission on Gregorian Chant began publishing the EDITIO VATICANA—still the Church’s official edition— they assigned different Masses to different types of feasts. However, they were careful to add a note (which began with the words “Qualislibet cantus hujus Ordinarii…”) making clear “chants from one Mass may be used together with those from others.” Sadly, I sometimes worked for TLM priests who weren’t fluent in Latin. As a result, they stubbornly insisted Mass settings were ‘assigned’ to different feasts and seasons (which is false). To understand the great variety, one should examine the 1904 KYRIALE of Dr. Peter Wagner. One should also look through Dom Mocquereau’s Liber Usualis (1904), in which the Masses are all mixed up. For instance, Gloria II in his book ended up being moved to the ‘ad libitum’ appendix in the EDITIO VATICANA.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Extreme Unction
    Those who search Google for “CCCC MS 079” will discover high resolution images of a medieval Pontificale (“Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 079”). One of the pages contains this absolutely gorgeous depiction of the Sacrament of Extreme Unction.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    PDF Chart • “Plainsong Rhythm”
    I will go to my grave without understanding the lack of curiosity so many people have about the rhythmic modifications made by Dom André Mocquereau. For example, how can someone examine this single sheet comparison chart and at a minimum not be curious about the differences? Dom Mocquereau basically creates a LONG-SHORT LONG-SHORT rhythmic pattern—in spite of enormous and overwhelming manuscript evidence to the contrary. That’s why some scholars referred to his method as “Neo-Mensuralist” or “Neo-Mensuralism.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF • “O Come All Ye Faithful” (Simplified)
    I admire the harmonization of “Adeste Fideles” by David Willcocks (d. 2015), who served as director of the Royal College of Music (London, England). In 2025, I was challenged to create a simplified arrangement for organists incapable of playing the authentic version at tempo. The result was this simplified keyboard arrangement (PDF download) based on the David Willcocks version of “O Come All Ye Faithful.” Feel free to play through it and let me know what you think.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

For the most part, a “good pope” is defined as someone who does what the critic would do if he were pope.

— William F. Buckley Jr. (6 September 1978)

Recent Posts

  • Music List • (2nd Sunday of Lent)
  • PDF Download • “Funerals in the Ordinary Form”
  • Extreme Unction
  • Like! Like! Like!
  • Which Mass?

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2026 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.