• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Can You Love Liturgy Too Much?

Jeff Ostrowski · April 6, 2015

061 Tenebrae OLY WEEK with the FSSP here in Los Angeles was unforgettable. The Easter Vigil, which began at 11:00pm, was conducted in complete darkness (until the Gloria), except for the light of candles. The darkness helped our minds focus. As the Exsultet was being sung, these words caught my attention:

“O inæstimábilis diléctio caritátis: ut servum redímeres, Fílium tradidísti!”
The precious favor of Thy love delivered up to death Thine only Son to buy back a slave’s life.

Giving up one’s child can only be fully appreciated by a parent, and this hit me like never before. Moreover, I began to feel utterly unworthy to be in God’s presence. In a few moments, I would enter the Sanctuary—along with another cantor, both of us wearing cassock & surplice—kneel down, and begin leading the Litany of the Saints. I was quite uncomfortable entering the Sanctuary; I would have preferred to hide under a rock.

At that moment, I realized the Liturgy is a type of SHIELD, helping us approach God without being obliterated by His Purity. Nothing we sinners can do will “earn” our salvation according to strict justice. Yet, fulfilling our role in the liturgy—praising God according to the ancient rites of the Church—is pleasing to Him, and this gave me comfort. I did not run from the Church; I sang the Litany as best I could.

According to Rocco Palmo, someone associated with the Congregation for Divine Worship recently intimated they will take the following approach to liturgy:

“Go by the book. Don’t make a fuss about it. And remember that liturgy’s always a means to an end—not an end in itself.”

Anyone with a rudimentary theological knowledge understands that liturgy is not an end in itself. 1 On the other hand, we ought to pay careful attention to the liturgy and perform our actions as perfectly as we can.

I USED TO ASSUME THAT ANYONE who denigrates the Traditional Latin Mass de facto had evil intentions. In recent years, I’m more inclined to think it’s a misunderstanding. Those who have little experience with the Extraordinary Form often characterize things in way I find utterly perplexing. They’ll take innocent actions—such as receiving Holy Communion kneeling or wearing traditional Church vestments—and explain them in ways I never imagined after decades of attending the EF. It reminds me of the comedian who explained the etymology of MANKIND by breaking it into fundamental parts: “mank” and “ind.”

Consider the words of Msgr. Francis Mannion, who has been horrified 2 to observe the resurgence of the Traditional Mass:

“I must say that having attended a number of Tridentine celebrations in recent years, I have been left with the impression that it is the ritual—rather than God—who is being worshipped. There can be a kind of idolatry here.”

Imagine a young boy wishing to please his father by carefully polishing his shoes. Is it really “idolatry,” or is it a child showing love to the parent? More than 1,200 people attended our EF Holy Week services; I would be reluctant to accuse a single one of idolatry.



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Traditionally, Catholics use the acronym “TARP” to remember the four ends: Thanksgiving, Adoration, Reparation, and Petition. Bishop Fulton J. Sheen has reminded us that “TARP” comes close to matching the order of importance, too!

2   To be fair, many critics of the Extraordinary Form went to the seminary at a time when the Old Testament was deëmphasized and are, therefore, unaware of the “ritualism” (to use one of Msgr. Mannion’s favorite words) of the Jewish ceremonies.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

The local church should be conscious that church worship is not really the same as what we sing in a bar, or what we sing in a convention for youth.

— Francis Cardinal Arinze (2005)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.