• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Opportunity of a Lifetime” • Don’t Miss This!

Jeff Ostrowski · March 17, 2025

F YOU NEED surgery on your neck, would you choose a surgeon who’s never performed neck surgery? Certainly not! Yet too many sacred music conferences select faculty members who have never stood in front of a choir in real life.1 Something which distinguishes the Sacred Music Symposium has always been its faculty: directors who have demonstrated excellence working in real parishes. This year, I’ve been in charge of a job which (in past years) was usually handled by Andrea Leal: viz. interviewing participants who apply. I’m encouraged and overjoyed by those who have already applied. This year’s roster is looking phenomenal. Something tells me this is going to be our best symposium yet—and the music we’re singing is sublime.

What Dr. Tappan Said • In one of his articles, Dr. Lucas Tappan said something to the effect of: “Early in my career, I realized I could easily spend the entire day answering emails. I decided to always prioritize teaching. If that meant failing to respond to emails, so be it.” I’ve been directing parish choirs for 25+ years. Like Dr. Tappan, I noticed something: I could easily spend hours each week editing recordings. I made a conscious decision to avoid that. There just isn’t time! I have numerous obligations—including obligations to my wife and children. Nevertheless, it’s been suggested to me that I owe it to those considering this year’s symposium to provide examples of how the choir I direct sounds. That idea struck me as reasonable.

Jeff’s Credentials • In light of that request, I spent the morning grabbing some excerpts from the most recent Mass we sang: 16 March 2025 (2nd Sunday of Lent). Several of our best singers were missing, but that doesn’t matter. Those who direct volunteer choirs must learn to expect absences. I began working for my current parish in August of 2024. Before my arrival, there was no choir—so I stood outside after each Mass and recruited singers from among those headed for their cars!

Live Recordings:
The volunteer choir
Jeff directs in Michigan

Example #01 • The first example is a clip from our OPENING HYMN. This was our first attempt at singing this hymn in SATB. I’m sure it will improve the more times we sing it:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #01: “Opening Hymn”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #02 • While the Celebrant incenses the altar, our women sing the ENTRANCE CHANT from the Graduale Romanum. I accompany them on the pipe organ. They are conducted by Kaitrin Drost, who’s a member of the faculty for this year’s Sacred Music Symposium. The vast majority of these women had never sung plainsong, but they’ve taken to it like a duck to water:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #02: “Entrance Chant”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #03 • During Lent, we sing the KYRIE in a way that involves both choir and congregation. First the ladies sing, then the congregation sings, then there’s a bit of glorious polyphony from the MASS IN HONOR OF SAINT NOËL CHABANEL:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #03: “Kýrie Eléison”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #04 • We have a professional singer and voice teacher here in Muskegon who serves as my assistant director: Kaitrin Drost. On Sunday she sang the Responsorial Psalm:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #04: “Kaitrin Drost as Soloist”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #05 • During Lent, the pipe organ is severely curtailed—except on LAETARE SUNDAY. At the Offertory, we sang #689 from the Brébeuf Hymnal. The ladies sing verse #1 in unison. Then, harmonies begin at marker 0:26, a moment you won’t want to miss!

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #05: “My Song Is Love Unknown”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #06 • The congregation joins us in singing the AGNUS DEI. Afterwards, the choir adds a brief polyphonic extension:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #06: “Agnus Dei”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #07 • We recently started a men’s Schola Cantorum. When the men heard the ladies chanting the various introits so beautifully, they wanted to do likewise. I feel that our men’s Schola Cantorum is off to an excellent start:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #07: “Communion Antiphon”
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Example #08 • After the reception of Holy Communion, we sang a splendid setting of Psalm 117 (in Latin and English). Polyphonic lines are added as the song progresses, as you can hear in this ‘live’ excerpt from Sunday:

*  Mp3 Download • EXAMPLE #08: “Psalm 117” (after Communion)
—Excerpt from Mass on 16 March 2025 • This parish choir is 100% volunteer.

Microphones aren’t capable of capturing the complex, luscious, resplendent, rich choral sound. I wish you could hear it in person. The singers sound absolutely gorgeous—and our church has magnificent acoustics.

Our Chance To Give Back • Father Valentine Young (d. 2020) had a favorite phrase, which he’d sometimes repeat: “The cemeteries are filled with people who thought they were indispensable.” All of us—myself included—must guard against the idea that God “needs” our efforts. In reality, we must thank God for allowing us to serve Him. Those of us who will be faculty members for this year’s Sacred Music Symposium are overjoyed at this opportunity to “give back” to the community, in our own small way. Let’s remember that when we refuse to admit that all goodness and beauty comes from God, we become like a rooster who takes credit for the sunrise.

This Will Change Your Life • I can’t emphasize strongly enough how thrilled I’ve been to interview (via Zoom) the various participants who have signed up to attend this year’s Sacred Music Symposium. We’ve been hosting this conference for 10 years, but something tells me this is going to be the best year yet! I cordially invite you to consider attending. This is something you won’t want to miss—and it could change your life forever. It’s important that you reserve your spot quickly, as space is limited.

*  Apply Today!  SACRED MUSIC SYMPOSIUM 2025

Bonus Clip • By the way, I was sent the following clip—recorded on an iPhone—showing our choir rehearsing for a wedding (directed by Kaitrin Drost, a member of the faculty for this year’s Sacred Music Symposium):

Here’s the direct URL link.

Concluding Thought

OW THAT THIS article has come to an end, I would like to clarify one thing. I’ve often claimed that the music sung at Mass should be performed with a certain excellence. It should not be done poorly. It shouldn’t make the congregation “suffer.” Rather, it ought to bring delight to the ear, raising one’s heart and mind to God. On the other hand, this concept can be taken too far. As artists, we want to please absolutely everyone. If we aren’t able to please everyone, we become depressed. But it’s actually not our job to please everyone. Due to our fallen human nature, there will always be a certain percentage of people who reject the Gospel, the teachings of the Church, and the beauty of authentic sacred music. Period. We need to accept this reality. Consider the following example. In the 1990s, television commercials provided a number to call. Folks who dialed that number paid for a “psychic” to tell them which historical figures their pets were—before being ‘reincarnated’ as pets. In other words, you would call the number and hear that your dog (in a former life) was actually George Washington. If you called again, the psychic would tell you that your goldfish (in another life) was actually Napoleon Bonaparte, Mahatma Gandhi, or Albert Einstein. Let that sink in! Real people would happily waste their money on such silly and sinful things. Next time you’re tempted to please “everyone,” remember that a certain percentage of people are foolish. They aren’t worth pleasing! We should worry about pleasing God. We should worry about adherence to the authentic traditions of the Catholic Church. Ultimately, that’s all we should worry about. My friends sometimes show me examples from the GIA PUBLICATIONS catalogue, exclaiming with a look of horror: “Can you believe the goofy, secular music being promoted by this catalogue?” My answer is always the same: “Why should we expect anything different? GIA PUBLICATIONS is owned by a non-Christian family. Agere sequitur esse. Why should we be surprised by this?” The point I’m trying to make is that we should not be surprised by scandals in the Church. Nor should we allow ourselves to become depressed if certain people don’t appreciate our work. In the final analysis, the only thing we should worry about is pleasing God.

1 Directing at a university or seminary can help prepare one to form a parish music program, but it cannot substitute for actual experience at the parish level. It pains me to see musicians who have never stood in front a choir (or who were unsuccessful at the parish level) being chosen to serve as faculty for choral festivals, colloquia, conventions, and sacred music conferences. As Monsignor Skeris used to exclaim: “The blind leading the blind!” Singing in a choir and taking conducting lessons are both extremely helpful, but they aren’t synonymous with forming a successful program at the parish level. A degree from the university can also prove invaluable—but it’s not a panacea. Indeed, I know several execrable parish music programs whose directors earned terminal degrees in choral conducting. Graduation is not the “end” of the race—it’s the beginning of one’s vocation. The really difficult work starts after one arrives at the parish.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, PDF Download Tagged With: Easy Polyphony For Amateurs, Simple Polyphony Last Updated: April 11, 2025

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“In 1848, Franz Liszt attended a performance of Schumann’s 1st Piano Trio, held in his honor in the Schumanns’ home. Liszt arrived two hours late with Wagner (who hadn’t been invited), derided the piece, and spoke ill of the recently deceased Mendelssohn. This upset the Schumanns, and Robert physically assaulted Liszt.”

— Janita Hall-Swadley

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up