• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Ite, Missa Est” • What Does That Actually Mean?

Jeff Ostrowski · February 13, 2024

ECHNICAL. Certain people make themselves look foolish by trying to get “technical.” For example, I remember a conversation during which I patiently explained how the Kansas City Chiefs are our football team. (By “our” I mean people who grew up in Kansas.) The other person kept saying: “They belong to Missouri, because that’s where they play.” He was trying to be technical; but he was mistaken. Growing up in Kansas, we attended many Chiefs’ games—including the mandatory 3-hour tailgating before the kick off. I can assure you: the Chiefs were our team.1

Harrison Butker • For the record, here’s a photograph showing our contributor, Dr. Lucas Tappan, alongside Harrison Butker, famous place kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs. The photograph was taken during a conference in San Francisco. (Harrison attends the Traditional Latin Mass.)

“Technical” Foul • Just as the person I mentioned earlier will go to his grave believing the Chiefs were not our team, some people try to get technical when it comes to the sacred liturgy. For example, they oppose the use of ALTAR CANDLES, since they’re no longer “necessary” in light of—pardon the pun—the invention of the incandescent light bulb. They oppose the MANIPLE because it’s no longer used to wipe sweat from the celebrant’s face. You get the idea. Such people hate (and misunderstand) tradition. Therefore, they misunderstand the sacred liturgy. Curiously, the self-same people have no objection to men wearing neckties, even though they no longer serve their original purpose.

Saint Athanasius of Alexandria • I wish I could say that priests, bishops, cardinals, and popes have never been guilty of scandal or heresy. Unfortunately, that’s not true. Do you doubt what I say? If so, read about Saint Athanasius of Alexandria. Or read about how Saint Joan of Arc (d. 1431) was excommunicated. Or call to mind that our Redeemer appointed Judas Iscariot (!) as an Apostle.

Bishop Ambo • When Church leaders are guilty of scandal or heresy, they must be held accountable. This reality came to mind when a friend shared this disturbing 2022 presentation by Bishop Ambo, president of the CATHOLIC BISHOPS’ CONFERENCE of the Philippines. Serious theologians should (perhaps) publish a “response” or “correction” or “refutation” to Bishop Ambo’s troubling statements. Since I’m not a theologian, I’ll go no further at this time. However, I will address a liturgical assertion made by Bishop Ambo. Having attacked the Church’s traditional terminology which says Catholic priests “celebrate” the Holy Mass, Bishop Ambo said this about the “Ite, Missa Est” at the end of Mass:

I think the confusion began when a “T” was added to the “ES” and became third person. It became a formula for dismissal: “Go, the Mass is ended.” Missa is the female past participle of mittere, the origin of the word missio, meaning sent. If you put it rather in the second person without the T, what it says is: “Go, you are being sent.”

Bishop Ambo’s statement is gibberish. “Ite, missa est” was never “Ite, missa es.” First of all, ite is plural—so nobody would say what he claims. More importantly, the construction created by Bishop Ambo (missa es) would only apply to a single female. Addressing one male, it would be missus es. Bishop Ambo may have been trying to say Ite, mittímini—but that’s not idiomatic. If one were speaking to a congregation (men & women, plural) the correct form would be: “Mitto vos.” I suspect Bishop Ambo was trying to be technical, which usually doesn’t end well. Those who study language recognize that “usage rules.” Language isn’t bound by logic. The ultimate law is how people actually speak. For example, in English—whether we like it or not—the same word can have two opposite (!) meanings; e.g. sanction. Because he lacked familiarity with Latin, Bishop Ambo fed his unsuspecting audience baloney. Those who desire to understand the correct translation of “Ite, missa est” should read the following excerpt by Father Adrian Fortescue (d. 1923), perhaps the world’s preëminent (anglophone) scholar before Knox:

*  PDF • Father Fortescue: “Ite, missa est”

Part 2:
“More Flies With Honey Than Vinegar”

FIRMLY BELIEVE every article of Faith. As Catholics, we believe THE SECOND PERSON OF THE BLESSED TRINITY becomes present on the altar when the priest says the words of Consecration. Certain things are inconsequential; e.g. the Roman Rite uses the form which says “Qui pridie quam pateretur,” whereas most Eastern liturgies have the form: “In the night in which he was betrayed.” If you’ll pardon the double negative, I’m inclined to believe other things are not inconsequential. Consider a declaration by the man appointed by Pope Saint Paul VI to be in charge of all the liturgical reforms: viz. CARDINAL LERCARO. On 2 March 1965, Lercaro published an article in l’Avennire d’Italia in which he strongly condemned liturgical abuses, giving concrete examples of practices he considered “fanciful” and “deplorable.” Just what were these “deplorable” abuses? (a) Communion in the hand; (b) a celebrant reciting the Canon in an audible voice. Furthermore, in a letter (25 January 1966) to the bishops’ conferences, Cardinal Lercaro called female altar servers “a grave infraction.” But those items are now mandated (!) by post-conciliar legislation. How should Catholics process this?

Miracle Of Miracles • I often wonder how any of us dares to step into the presence of the SANCTISSIMUM. Just because somebody is properly dressed and genuflects doesn’t mean that person is worthy to be in the presence of the SECOND PERSON OF THE BLESSED TRINITY. Do we actually realize what a miracle this is? It’s far beyond our comprehension. I’m frequently astounded I’m not struck dead the moment I step into the presence of the Blessed Sacrament. Who can grasp this miracle?

Fulton J. Sheen • The time may come when our leaders reassess the wisdom of decisions they have made. For example, I believe it’s wrong for anyone who’s not a priest or deacon to touch the SANCTISSIMUM. But many churches allow “extraordinary ministers”—that is to say, lay people who walk into the sanctuary and touch the SANCTISSIMUM. I personally feel this practice should be stopped, even though it’s currently allowed in many localities. (I’d be curious to hear how readers view this practice.) At the same time, it’s not easy to know when we should “confront” or “criticize” or “attack” our leaders. Consider the following statement, from the autobiography of Fulton J. Sheen:

“I can remember as a small boy, about the time when Pius X allowed children to make First Communion, there was a discussion at our family table about its wisdom. A relative who was visiting took a position opposed to that of the Holy Father. How deeply shocked I was at him who, with so little wisdom, opposed the saintly and wise Pontiff! All during my life, attacks against the Church have hurt me as much as attacks against my own mother. The knowledge of a consecrated man of God or a consecrated woman abandoning her vows always caused a heartbreak in my soul.”

But when Fulton J. Sheen was young, there weren’t many attacks from inside the Church—whereas in the year 2024, we see many such attacks. Therefore, that quotation might not apply to our current situation. I don’t pretend to have any answers.

Connected How? • You might be wondering where I’m going with all this. Well, on one hand we have a duty to serve JESUS CHRIST, and all worship must be directed to glorifying God—in particular when He is present on our altars: Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. On the other hand, I believe it was Saint Augustine who reminded us that “one catches more flies with honey than vinegar.” Traditionally, sacred music was something that gives DELIGHT. Listening to the music during Mass should not be drudgery. That’s never been the tradition of the Church. Some have argued that sacred music is “completely for God” and therefore its effect on the faithful “should never enter the discussion”—but this is false. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to notice the fallacies in such an argument; e.g. the Missa Privata has never had music. If sacred music were “only for God” there would be nothing preventing priests from singing the PREFACE during a Missa Privata or Low Mass.

Part 3:
“Keys To Success”

OW CAN WE MAKE SURE music we choose from the THESAURUS MUSICAE SACRAE is a delight to listen to? How can we make sure it’s not burdensome to the congregation? One “approach” or “strategy” worthy of consideration by the competent choirmaster is that of musical diversity. I will now present a few audio examples from our Mass last Sunday to illustrate what I mean. The first is rather interesting, because it’s a hymn tune (“WAREHAM”) which has just one (!) skip; the rest is 100% stepwise motion. Technically, that goes against the rules of how to compose a nice melody. On the other hand, rules are made to be broken! Indeed, Johann Sebastian Bach once wrote a gorgeous and captivating fugue subject with only one skip:

Wareham Hymn • Here’s my volunteer choir—females only—singing the WAREHAM HYMN I’ve been talking about:

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

Plainsong With Polyphony • Last Sunday we sang an interesting mixture of solo singing, accompanied plainsong, and Renaissance polyphony:

Here’s the direct URL link.

Carmen Gregorianum • We always make sure to sing CARMEN GREGORIANUM (Gregorian Chant), which—according to the Second Vatican Council—should have “first place” under ordinary circumstances:

Here’s the direct URL link.

Abbat Pothier in the 19th century proved that Gregorian Chant goes back 1,200 years. Specifically—by creating magnificent comparative charts—he demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt the one-to-one comparison amongst both “diastematic” and “adiastematic” manuscripts. Notice that the following ancient manuscript is virtually identical to what we sang last Sunday:

Stepwise Bass Motion • You can download the organ accompaniment I played, created by the LEMMENSINSTITUUT. Notice the stepwise motion in the bass, which I talk about constantly in my nine-hour seminar (which I hope you’ll consider purchasing):

Men Singing Plainsong • We always do a bit of unaccompanied plainsong; e.g. here’s an excerpt from CREDO I, sometimes called the “authentic” version:

*  Mp3 Download • Excerpt from CREDO I (live)

If It Ain’t Baroque… • Still seeking musical diversity, we included some music from the Baroque:

*  Mp3 Download • J.S. BACH “SANCTUS” (Excerpt)

Modern Music • We sang a breathtaking contemporary piece my choir can’t get enough of. It comes from a collection for Soprano, Alto, and Bass called “Matri Divinae Gratiae” by the legendary Kevin Allen:

Here’s the direct URL link.

Conclusions • I began this article by speaking of people who attempt to correct others by “getting technical.” I pointed out that anyone with such a mentality will never understand the sacred liturgy. I suggested that it’s praiseworthy to do everything we can to remind our fellow human beings that JESUS CHRIST is the AUTHOR of everything good, true and beautiful. The music mandated by the Second Vatican Council—viz. the THESAURUS MUSICAE SACRAE—should be delightful. Hearing it should not be drudgery. A useful strategy for the competent choirmaster, highlighted in today’s article, is that of musical diversity. This approach is based upon the reality that homo modernus possesses a shorter attention span than previous generations (perhaps on account of computers, microwaves, Instagram, and TIKTOK).

1 Just as the DENVER BRONCOS were our sworn enemy.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, PDF Download Tagged With: Harrison Butker, Ite Missa Est Meaning, Johann Sebastian Bach, Kansas City Chiefs, Latin Mass Musical Diversity, Pablo Virgilio David, Rev Fr Adrian Fortescue Liturgy, Thesaurus musicae sacrae, Traditional Latin Mass Harrison Butker Last Updated: February 13, 2024

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Legitimate and necessary concern for current realities in the concrete lives of people cannot make us forget the true nature of the liturgical actions. It is clear that the Mass is not the time to “celebrate” human dignity or purely terrestrial claims or hopes. It is rather the sacrifice which renders Christ really present in the sacrament.

— Pope Saint John Paul II (20 March 1990)

Recent Posts

  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
  • “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.