• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

PDF Download • Rare “Kyriale” Organ Accompaniment Book (175 pages)

Jeff Ostrowski · November 16, 2022

ESTERDAY AFTERNOON, my friend in Paris sent me a scanned copy of a rare book. It’s an organ accompaniment for the KYRIALE (Ordinary of the Mass) composed by Monsignor Franz Nekes (d. 1914), a professor at the Gregoriushaus in Aachen. Nekes was a famous church musician whom some considered “the German Palestrina.” The book appears to be a compilation, containing accompaniments for the ORDINARIUM MISSAE dated 1906 as well as Editio Vaticana items that appeared later, such as Toni Communes (“Liber Tonarius”). While the compilation is dated 1912, the chief section comes from 1906. Examine the index, or download the entire book as a PDF file:

*  PDF • Monsignor Nekes “KYRIALE” Organ Accompaniment (175 pages)
—Ordinarium Missæ; Missa pro defunctis; Toni Communes Missæ; Veni Creator; Pange Lingua.

Ghastly Yet Valuable • The accompaniments by Monsignor Nekes reflect his background. Like his contemporaries—such as Wagner, Springer, and Mathias—he treats plainsong like Mozart. I personally consider them ghastly! Nevertheless, they are of great historical interest. Moreover, they show us yet another example of an author who took seriously the official rhythm. And there’s no shortage of Trochee Trouble, as you can see:

Professor Weaver • As part of the Gregorian Rhythm Wars series, my colleague Professor Weaver made several statements vis-à-vis whether there is an “official rhythm” for the Editio Vaticana. For those who live in the United States, this is quite a busy time of year. I have no desire to “re-hash” everything I wrote in my recent article. Nevertheless, I welcome an opportunity to make a few brief utterances in light of what Professor Weaver wrote.

Reminder To All • My discussion of documents should not be interpreted as an attack on anyone’s performance practice. To put it another way: Making people aware of documents of the Church and discussing those documents is something that nobody ought to feel threatened by. I’m sure my colleagues agree, but it’s good to remind our readership.

“Inseparable From The Edition Itself” • Professor Weaver wrote: “In this post, I will argue that Ostrowski’s arguments for both claims are fallacious.” It may seem insignificant, but I would like to underscore that I don’t consider these claims as mine. For instance, the letter from the Prefect for the Congregation of Sacred Rites dated 18 February 1910 speaks (explicitly) on behalf of “the mind of the Holy Father and of the Sacred Congregation of Rites.” That letter specifically says “the rhythmical form of the melodies […] is inseparable from the edition itself.”

“Misunderstanding” Not Trick • My colleague wrote: “Ostrowski suggests that Mocquereau may have tricked Pius X into allowing the rhythmic signs by implying that he would follow the official rhythm.” I do not believe my assertion was that Dom Mocquereau tricked the pope into doing anything. The fact is, Papal audiences are almost always extremely rushed. If memory serves, Pope Pius X was not fluent in French. Moreover, the Graduale Romanum would not be published for another four (!) years. As I made clear in my previous article, many of Dom Mocquereau’s rhythmic signs are harmless—intended only to help the singers follow the conductor—whereas others have the capability to contradict the rhythm. I find it difficult to believe that Pope Pius X intended to give ‘perpetual permission’ to contradict the rhythm of virtually every melody in the Editio Vaticana. Moreover, documentation shows that Dom Mocquereau had not (yet) decided upon such a plan. This was 23 March 1904, whereas the Graduale would not appear until 1908 and the Antiphonale would not appear until 1912.

Valuable Document • I wish to thank Professor Weaver for locating a copy of a rare and valuable document (Le décret du 14 février 1906 de la S. Congrégation des Rites et les signes rythmiques des bénédictins de Solesmes) written by Dom Mocquereau. On the other hand, Professor Weaver writes: “It is true that Mocquereau incorporated the rhythmic signs of his earlier books into the Vatican Edition…” That’s not exactly true. For instance, consider the example we’ve been talking about so much on this blog: viz. the INTROIT for the 22nd Sunday after Pentecost. Notice how Dom Mocquereau added a whole slew of episemata contradicting the official rhythm. What changed between 1903 and 1908? To my knowledge, MOC’S FANTASTIC FOUR had been published for decades by 1904. Was it appropriate for Katharine Ellis to cite evidence showing Prior André Mocquereau may have “put as many rhythmic signs as possible in the Graduale and in the Antiphonale” due to financial incentives? I am not saying this was the case, but it’s hard to explain why it suddenly became so important for Mocquereau to contradict the official rhythm in a way he had not done in 1903. Could this be a manifestation of the “intransigency” which even Father Angelo de Santi condemned? 1

Quashing Prefaces! • I know this risks putting readers to sleep, but let’s briefly discuss the PREFACE to the Vatican Edition. Obviously, Abbat Pothier wrote parts of it—because large sections were lifted verbatim from the 1880s publications. Father Robert Skeris told me in 2003 that Dr. Peter Wagner “wrote the preface to the Editio Vaticana,” but I believe he was referencing only the ‘controversial’ sections, such as this one. On 28 October 1905, Julius Bas wrote to Dom Mocquereau: “Father de Santi has instructed me to tell you that the author of the famous Preface of the Graduale is the very learned Doctor Wagner.” Something is odd about that date—28 October 1905—since the Liber Gradualis would not appear until 1908. Did Dom Combe make a mistake? Not necessarily, because the PREFACE was intended to appear along with the 1905 Kyriale, but it was quashed at the last second as it was deemed too controversial. At least this is how I understand the sequence of events. You can see how it’s described by Dom Combe. (Notice his claim that Abbat Pothier’s Antiphonale preface was also quashed … that clearly wasn’t a good decade for preface writers!)

“Not Binding” • My colleague wrote: “Apart from the feelings of Cardinal Martinelli, the rhythmic rules of the Vatican Edition preface were not considered binding by its own author within two years of the publication of the Vatican Edition Graduale.” I don’t think such an assertion can be maintained. First of all, when Dr. Wagner taught the Editio Vaticana at his Gregorian Academy in Freiburg (Switzerland), he did not teach his theories about mensuralism to his students: Joseph Gogniat, Charles Dreisoerner, Karl Weinmann, K.G. Fellerer, and so forth. Moreover, if you examine Dr. Wagner’s organ accompaniments to the Antiphonale (circa 1913?), he does not apply mensuralism. In other words, Dr. Wagner divorced scientific research from ‘practical’ church music.

A Puzzling Statement • I don’t see how Professor Weaver can claim there’s “no such thing” as the official rhythm—in light of so many publications by Dessain, Pustet, August Wiltberger, Father Mathias, Father Nekes, Max Springer, Father Weinmann, and so forth—and I will be interested to hear more! Furthermore, he did not respond to the question I asked: What is so terrible about the official edition? Does it not make sense to sing an edition as it was intended? My singers have found it gloriously refreshing and eminently natural.

1 On Dom Mocquereau’s “intransigency,” please see The Restoration of Gregorian Chant: Solesmes and the Vatican Edition by Dom Pierre Combe, page 339. Father de Santi uses the same word (“intrasigent”) that Abbat Pothier had used in a letter he wrote Dom Mocquereau on 25 June 1905.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured, PDF Download Tagged With: Father Angelo de Santi, Missa Pro Defunctis, Ordinarium Missae, Toni Communes Missae Last Updated: November 29, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 27th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 5 October 2025, which is the 27th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the spectacular feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. Readers will want to check out the ENTRANCE CHANT posted there, which has a haunting melody (in the DEUTERUS MODE) and extremely powerful text.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Is it not true that prohibiting or suspecting the extraordinary form can only be inspired by the demon who desires our suffocation and spiritual death?”

— The Vatican’s chief liturgist from 2014-2021, Interview with Edw. Pentin (23-Sep-2019)

Recent Posts

  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
  • “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
  • “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
  • Involving Women in the Communion?

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.