• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

We’re a 501(c)3 public charity established in 2006. We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and run no advertisements. We exist solely by the generosity of small donors.

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

PDF Download • Rare “Kyriale” Organ Accompaniment Book (175 pages)

Jeff Ostrowski · November 16, 2022

ESTERDAY AFTERNOON, my friend in Paris sent me a scanned copy of a rare book. It’s an organ accompaniment for the KYRIALE (Ordinary of the Mass) composed by Monsignor Franz Nekes (d. 1914), a professor at the Gregoriushaus in Aachen. Nekes was a famous church musician whom some considered “the German Palestrina.” The book appears to be a compilation, containing accompaniments for the ORDINARIUM MISSAE dated 1906 as well as Editio Vaticana items that appeared later, such as Toni Communes (“Liber Tonarius”). While the compilation is dated 1912, the chief section comes from 1906. Examine the index, or download the entire book as a PDF file:

*  PDF • Monsignor Nekes “KYRIALE” Organ Accompaniment (175 pages)
—Ordinarium Missæ; Missa pro defunctis; Toni Communes Missæ; Veni Creator; Pange Lingua.

Ghastly Yet Valuable • The accompaniments by Monsignor Nekes reflect his background. Like his contemporaries—such as Wagner, Springer, and Mathias—he treats plainsong like Mozart. I personally consider them ghastly! Nevertheless, they are of great historical interest. Moreover, they show us yet another example of an author who took seriously the official rhythm. And there’s no shortage of Trochee Trouble, as you can see:

Professor Weaver • As part of the Gregorian Rhythm Wars series, my colleague Professor Weaver made several statements vis-à-vis whether there is an “official rhythm” for the Editio Vaticana. For those who live in the United States, this is quite a busy time of year. I have no desire to “re-hash” everything I wrote in my recent article. Nevertheless, I welcome an opportunity to make a few brief utterances in light of what Professor Weaver wrote.

Reminder To All • My discussion of documents should not be interpreted as an attack on anyone’s performance practice. To put it another way: Making people aware of documents of the Church and discussing those documents is something that nobody ought to feel threatened by. I’m sure my colleagues agree, but it’s good to remind our readership.

“Inseparable From The Edition Itself” • Professor Weaver wrote: “In this post, I will argue that Ostrowski’s arguments for both claims are fallacious.” It may seem insignificant, but I would like to underscore that I don’t consider these claims as mine. For instance, the letter from the Prefect for the Congregation of Sacred Rites dated 18 February 1910 speaks (explicitly) on behalf of “the mind of the Holy Father and of the Sacred Congregation of Rites.” That letter specifically says “the rhythmical form of the melodies […] is inseparable from the edition itself.”

“Misunderstanding” Not Trick • My colleague wrote: “Ostrowski suggests that Mocquereau may have tricked Pius X into allowing the rhythmic signs by implying that he would follow the official rhythm.” I do not believe my assertion was that Dom Mocquereau tricked the pope into doing anything. The fact is, Papal audiences are almost always extremely rushed. If memory serves, Pope Pius X was not fluent in French. Moreover, the Graduale Romanum would not be published for another four (!) years. As I made clear in my previous article, many of Dom Mocquereau’s rhythmic signs are harmless—intended only to help the singers follow the conductor—whereas others have the capability to contradict the rhythm. I find it difficult to believe that Pope Pius X intended to give ‘perpetual permission’ to contradict the rhythm of virtually every melody in the Editio Vaticana. Moreover, documentation shows that Dom Mocquereau had not (yet) decided upon such a plan. This was 23 March 1904, whereas the Graduale would not appear until 1908 and the Antiphonale would not appear until 1912.

Valuable Document • I wish to thank Professor Weaver for locating a copy of a rare and valuable document (Le décret du 14 février 1906 de la S. Congrégation des Rites et les signes rythmiques des bénédictins de Solesmes) written by Dom Mocquereau. On the other hand, Professor Weaver writes: “It is true that Mocquereau incorporated the rhythmic signs of his earlier books into the Vatican Edition…” That’s not exactly true. For instance, consider the example we’ve been talking about so much on this blog: viz. the INTROIT for the 22nd Sunday after Pentecost. Notice how Dom Mocquereau added a whole slew of episemata contradicting the official rhythm. What changed between 1903 and 1908? To my knowledge, MOC’S FANTASTIC FOUR had been published for decades by 1904. Was it appropriate for Katharine Ellis to cite evidence showing Prior André Mocquereau may have “put as many rhythmic signs as possible in the Graduale and in the Antiphonale” due to financial incentives? I am not saying this was the case, but it’s hard to explain why it suddenly became so important for Mocquereau to contradict the official rhythm in a way he had not done in 1903. Could this be a manifestation of the “intransigency” which even Father Angelo de Santi condemned? 1

Quashing Prefaces! • I know this risks putting readers to sleep, but let’s briefly discuss the PREFACE to the Vatican Edition. Obviously, Abbat Pothier wrote parts of it—because large sections were lifted verbatim from the 1880s publications. Father Robert Skeris told me in 2003 that Dr. Peter Wagner “wrote the preface to the Editio Vaticana,” but I believe he was referencing only the ‘controversial’ sections, such as this one. On 28 October 1905, Julius Bas wrote to Dom Mocquereau: “Father de Santi has instructed me to tell you that the author of the famous Preface of the Graduale is the very learned Doctor Wagner.” Something is odd about that date—28 October 1905—since the Liber Gradualis would not appear until 1908. Did Dom Combe make a mistake? Not necessarily, because the PREFACE was intended to appear along with the 1905 Kyriale, but it was quashed at the last second as it was deemed too controversial. At least this is how I understand the sequence of events. You can see how it’s described by Dom Combe. (Notice his claim that Abbat Pothier’s Antiphonale preface was also quashed … that clearly wasn’t a good decade for preface writers!)

“Not Binding” • My colleague wrote: “Apart from the feelings of Cardinal Martinelli, the rhythmic rules of the Vatican Edition preface were not considered binding by its own author within two years of the publication of the Vatican Edition Graduale.” I don’t think such an assertion can be maintained. First of all, when Dr. Wagner taught the Editio Vaticana at his Gregorian Academy in Freiburg (Switzerland), he did not teach his theories about mensuralism to his students: Joseph Gogniat, Charles Dreisoerner, Karl Weinmann, K.G. Fellerer, and so forth. Moreover, if you examine Dr. Wagner’s organ accompaniments to the Antiphonale (circa 1913?), he does not apply mensuralism. In other words, Dr. Wagner divorced scientific research from ‘practical’ church music.

A Puzzling Statement • I don’t see how Professor Weaver can claim there’s “no such thing” as the official rhythm—in light of so many publications by Dessain, Pustet, August Wiltberger, Father Mathias, Father Nekes, Max Springer, Father Weinmann, and so forth—and I will be interested to hear more! Furthermore, he did not respond to the question I asked: What is so terrible about the official edition? Does it not make sense to sing an edition as it was intended? My singers have found it gloriously refreshing and eminently natural.

1 On Dom Mocquereau’s “intransigency,” please see The Restoration of Gregorian Chant: Solesmes and the Vatican Edition by Dom Pierre Combe, page 339. Father de Santi uses the same word (“intrasigent”) that Abbat Pothier had used in a letter he wrote Dom Mocquereau on 25 June 1905.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured, PDF Download Tagged With: Father Angelo de Santi, Missa Pro Defunctis, Ordinarium Missae, Toni Communes Missae Last Updated: November 29, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Luis Martínez Must Go!
    Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!
    A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Booklet of Eucharistic Hymns” (16 pages)
    I was asked to create a booklet for my parish to use during our CORPUS CHRISTI PROCESSION on 22 June 2025. Would you be willing to look over the DRAFT BOOKLET (16 pages) I came up with? I tried to include a variety of hymns: some have a refrain; some are in major, others in minor; some are metered, others are plainsong; some are in Spanish, some are in Latin, but most are in English. Normally, we’d use the Brébeuf Hymnal—but we can’t risk having our congregation carry those heavy books all over the city to various churches.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

Ronald Knox explained why the Modernists do not compose hymns: “Birds of prey have no song.”

— Fr. George William Rutler (2016)

Recent Posts

  • Hidden Gem: Ascendit Deus (Dalitz)
  • PDF Download • Soprano Descant — “Hail, Holy Queen Enthroned Above”
  • “Dom Jausions had a skilled hand. His transcriptions are masterpieces of neatness & precision.”
  • Pope Leo XIV pays tribute to Palestrina
  • PDF Download • Palestrina’s “Ave Maria”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up