• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

(Screenshots) • Proving Holy Saturday Took Place In The Morning

Jeff Ostrowski · February 28, 2021

HEN YOU SCROLL to the bottom of this article, you’ll discover photographs proving the ceremonies of Holy Week formerly took place in the morning. After 1955, these ceremonies were pushed back to a later time (which, incidentally, annihilated the ancient custom of TENEBRAE). Some Catholics will never admit these ceremonies traditionally happened in the morning—no matter how much evidence is provided. They believe an “Easter Vigil” can only happen the night before Easter Sunday. They fail to understand that all of the vigils in the Extraordinary Form traditionally happen in the morning: Ascension Vigil, Christmas Vigil, Pentecost Vigil, and so forth. Yet it’s more than passing strange these same “liturgy experts” have no problem allowing anticipated Masses early on Saturday afternoons…

Why Was Holy Saturday Moved? All authors admit that many centuries ago (“in former ages,” as Sir Walter K. Blount put it) the Easter Vigil happened around midnight on Holy Saturday night—it was not originally in the morning. In this article, I examine how it went from the Evening to Morning—then ended up back in the Evening! Let me say: THERE IS NO SIMPLE ANSWER to this question. But that’s okay, because many things in life don’t have a simple answer.

The Common Reason Given: When it comes to why the Holy Week Services were in the morning prior to 1955, the most frequent response is: Communion Fasting Regulations. That’s actually a decent answer (cf. CHRISTUS DOMINUS: Concerning The Discipline To Be Observed With Respect To The Eucharistic Fast, 6 January 1953), especially when it comes to Holy Thursday. The fasting laws also help explain why Solemn Mass was often at 5:30am on Easter Sunday morning, allowing elderly pastors to have breakfast after the Solemn Mass had ended.

An Even Better Reason: However, the major reason why the Vigil Mass on Holy Saturday was moved from Night to Morning was the same basic reason certain sections of the Divine Office were gradually pushed back in time. For example, a cleric praying the Divine Office in the Extraordinary Form may “anticipate” Matins (the morning prayers) the day before it happens as early as 2:00pm. Father Adrian Fortescue put it this way:

The first thing to understand about the service of Holy Saturday morning is that it was all composed to be held during the night between Saturday and Sunday. This is the most conspicuous case of the way services so often are pushed back in time. Gradual development first drove it back to the evening before, then to the afternoon, and now finally we keep it on Saturday morning. […] In the West, it must soon have seemed strange to sing Mass in the afternoon; so, once the original hour was changed, the time would soon become the morning rather than the evening of Saturday.

Get An Obligation Over With: When Monsignor Francis P. Schmitt visited the Abbey of Solesmes, he commented: “I wondered, too, through the never-ending offices of night and day, about losing the mundane satisfaction that I had ‘finished’ my prayers.” Father Valentine Young (d. 2020)—who entered the seminary in 1942—agrees with Father Fortescue’s explanation about Holy Saturday. Father Valentine wrote to me as follows in 2018:

I don’t think everything done before the reforms of Pius XII was necessarily all that good. I certainly didn’t think it was a good idea to celebrate Holy Thursday Last Supper Mass on Thursday morning or Holy Saturday Easter Vigil Services on Saturday morning was a good idea, but that was what we did. The practice probably developed because of the desire of people—and the desire of priests and religious and monks—to get their religious obligations out of the way, just like now a lot of elderly people will go to Mass on Saturdays, in spite of the fact that they don’t have a thing to do on Sundays. They just want to get their obligation “over with.” It’s kind of a human nature thing.

Secular Vs. Monastic: As a young boy, I remember hearing Father Peter Gee, FSSP, argue with another priest about “veritas horarum.” Essentially, Father Gee said the hours should be prayed close to their titles: Matins in the morning, Vespers toward the evening, and so forth. The other priest was saying that this is only possible in monasteries; secular priests are very busy and they can pray their breviary at a convenient time. I’m not sure this dispute will ever be resolved. They say Rafael Merry del Val was so busy he’d say his Divine Office “two-days-at-once,” starting at 10:30pm and praying right through midnight, making it possible for him to finish two days in one sitting. Another story tells of the reformers of the Breviary who came and proudly presented their finished work to Pope Saint John XXIII. The smiling pope exclaimed: “Oh, how I love the Divine Office—I say mine every morning!” The Divine Office matters because many sources say the Easter Vigil should begin “after NONE.” We are talking here about the ninth hour, circa 3:00pm. (We are not talking about “Noon.”) As far as I can tell, however, there is no legislation for the Extraordinary Form stipulating that NONE has to be prayed at a certain time. In 1939, the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Westminster prayed NONE at 8:45AM.

Our Imagination: I stumbled across an article on the blog of the Church Music Association of America, wherein author Gregory DiPippo makes the following statement: “The reform of Pope Pius XII did not in fact restore the Easter vigil to its proper historical time after NONE, since it mandated that the vigil is to start at such an hour that the actual Mass will begin around midnight.” I do not understand why Mr. DiPippo would make such a statement, in light of what Father Herbert Thurston (d. 1939) has written: 1

It is difficult to persuade oneself at 8:00AM on Saturday morning that the sun has already set, that our watch is nearly over, that more than 24 hours have elapsed since our Blessed Lord was laid in the Tomb. That is, however, the effort of the imagination which the Church requires us to make. Of course, originally the service did not begin until the evening. Even as late as the 9th or 10th century it is expressly stipulated by liturgical writers that the Gloria in excelsis should not be sung until the stars had begun to appear, while in primitive times it would seem that the service was later still, and lasted almost until dawn on Easter Sunday.

The 1917 Code of Canon Law made an exception for Christmas Mass at midnight. Perhaps Pope Pius XII just placed the vigil too late from force of habit?

Pius XII — Not A Trailblazer: According to Mr. James Monti, an effort to restore the entire Easter Vigil to the Evening was undertaken by Saint John Gualbert (d. 1073AD), founder of the Vallombrosan Order, a Benedictine congregation of Italy, as related by his biographer Blessed Andrew of Strumi (d. 1097AD): “Who in Tuscany other than he moved from the day to the night the annual and renowned office to be done on the night of the holy Resurrection? For with stealthy negligence and gathering gluttony this office was performed at NONE on Saturday, that is now rightly and worthily done in the holy night, this our father John beginning and establishing in our times.” Thus the Easter Vigil rubrics of the 12th-century Customary of Vallombrosa direct that the blessing of the Easter Fire—with which the vigil commences—is to start only when “the dusk of night shall have begun to appear.”

Conclusions: In the article I mentioned earlier, Mr. Gregory DiPippo says: “There is no particular reason why the Easter Vigil as it was prior to 1955 could not be celebrated at the hour newly appointed by Pope Pius XII.” In my opinion, however, the ceremonies should remain in the morning for the following reasons:

[Reason #1]
The main celebration should be on Easter Sunday, with the beautiful SEQUENCE (“Victimae Paschali Laudes”), and so forth. When the Faithful attend the Easter Vigil until 3:00AM, it is not “family friendly” to expect them to come back four hours later with their children.

[Reason #2]
It is not “traditional” to make the Easter Vigil more solemn than Easter Sunday. In my experience, where the Easter Vigil is celebrated with maximum solemnity the night before, the ceremonies on Easter Sunday always suffer. Prior to 1955, the Bishop of the Diocese would often not attend the Easter Vigil—let’s ponder that!

[Reason #3]
The character of the Easter Vigil was penitential, and during twelve long readings the catechumens were being prepared. (Yes, you read that correctly: while the readings were happening.) After the ceremony, there was frequently a reception for the people who’d just been baptized, becoming Catholic. This arrangement worked very well on Saturday afternoon, but I’ve seen it attempted at 3:00AM and it simply doesn’t work. I’m sure somebody will exclaim: “Oh, who cares about welcoming new converts to the Church?” But I really think there’s something beautiful in this.

[Reason #4]
A very ancient and powerful tradition called “TENEBRÆ” was destroyed when the Holy Week ceremonies were moved to the evening. Other devotions (e.g. “Seven Last Words”) were also destroyed.

[Reason #5]
Easter Sunday ought to be the main celebration of Easter. The Easter Vigil has less music than any other Mass. Even a ferial Mass has more music! There is no “Vidi Aquam.” There is no Introit. There is no Sequence. The (short) Alleluia is followed by a Tract! There is no Gradual or Greater Alleluia. There are no candles at the Gospel. There is no Creed. There is no Offertory Antiphon. The Kiss of Peace is omitted. There is no Agnus Dei. There is no Communion Antiphon. That’s why the Easter Vigil works well as a “penitential” ceremony on Holy Saturday morning, and Easter Sunday is a richly “happy” ceremony.

I cannot emphasize this statement enough: even a ferial Mass has more music than the Easter Vigil. That should tell us something, my friends! For the last 30+ years, an idea has arisen (in both the Ordinary Form and the Extraordinary Form) that the Easter Vigil is somehow the “crown jewel” of all ceremonies. I will never accept this, because a Mass which has less music than a ferial Mass cannot be the crown jewel.

In 1943, Holy Thursday started at 8:30AM, Good Friday started at 8:00AM, Holy Saturday started at 7:00AM, and Easter Sunday started at 5:30AM (Solemn Mass):

In 1905, Good Friday started at 9:00AM and Holy Saturday started at 8:00AM:

In 1946, Holy Thursday started at 8:00AM, Good Friday started at Noon, and Holy Saturday started at 7:00AM:

In 1948, Good Friday started at 9:00AM:

In 1941, Good Friday started at 9:00AM and Holy Saturday started at 6:30AM:

In 1954, Holy Thursday started at Noon, Good Friday started at 3:00PM, and Holy Saturday started at 11:00AM. In 1955, Holy Saturday would no longer be allowed to start in the morning.

Final Thoughts: For more than a thousand years, the ceremonies of Holy Saturday took place earlier in the day. The Extraordinary Form celebrates all vigils in the morning: the Vigil of Christmas, the Vigil of the Ascension, the Vigil of Pentecost, and so on. There’s nothing to be embarrassed about here. It is true the Exsultet makes reference to “this holy night”—but if we start down that road of “literalism” where will it end? Should we eliminate candles because we have electric lights? Surely not…


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Abbot Fernand Cabrol (d. 1937) also agrees that in very ancient times the Easter Vigil took place on the evening of Holy Saturday: cf. The Complete Offices of Holy Week (Right Rev’d Fernand Cabrol, 1926).

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Anticipated Vigil Mass Saturday Night, Easter Vigil Morning, High Mass with Vernacular, His Holiness Pope Pius XII, Holy Thursday Morning, Pre-1955 Holy Week Last Updated: September 11, 2021

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“We decided to entrust this work to learned men of our selection. They very carefully collated all their work with the ancient codices in Our Vatican Library and with reliable, preserved or emended codices from elsewhere. Besides this, these men consulted the works of ancient and approved authors concerning the same sacred rites; and thus they have restored the Missal itself to the original form and rite of the holy Fathers.”

— ‘Pope St. Pius V (Quo Primum, 1570)’

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up