• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Homily: 8th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A)

Guest Author · March 1, 2014

ODAY’S GOSPEL is a continuation of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Being God, He did not have to prepare or rehearse what He was going to say. But on the other hand, who knows, He might have spent the night before in prayer or in ‘conscious contact’ with His Heavenly Father thinking over what He was going to say to the people the next day. Now, I have to admit, this is just idle speculation on my part and you are free to take it or leave it.

The Two Masters: Probably the most puzzling word in the first part is that word ‘mammon’. One of the wonderful things about computers is that you can type in or google the word ‘mammon’ and you will have all kinds of information. In this particular case, the general idea of the word ‘mammon’ is that it refers to money, wealth and riches. Sometimes preachers will make a point of the fact that in the first case Jesus uses the words ‘hate and love’ and then He says ‘be devoted to and despise’ in the other. A thought that occurred to me was one found in Hebrew poetry, especially in the Psalms. There, frequently, the authors will try to repeat the same thing or idea but in different ways. I do think though, that when it comes to people who love money and wealth or who make money or wealth their god, that often this god does not make them happy. Instead of their money making them enjoy life, it almost seems to make them miserable. However, I do not intend to make that the main focus for today.

I have entitled the following part of my sermon or homily as the positive approach to life and happiness. Oh, if we could only really believe and trust Jesus’ words when He tells us not to worry about our lives, about what we will eat or drink or wear. I wonder if I asked you people present here: Has anyone ever been close to starving to death? Has anyone here ever not had enough clothing to wear? Has anyone here ever been homeless? I doubt if any hands would go up. We have never been anywhere near the point when we had nothing to eat, at least not for any extended period of time.

I don’t like to speak in psychological terms, since the only psychology I ever studied was the general courses which we had in the seminary. I do know that psychologists will make a distinction between what we know intellectually or in our head, and what we feel in our heart or, to speak colloquially, in our gut. I once heard this distinction made between faith and trust. The following example may bring this out. Faith exists when I believe that a tight-rope walker can push a wheel-barrow over a rope suspended high in the air. Trust would exist if I’m willing to ride in the wheel-barrow! In today’s Gospel Jesus is trying to teach us how to increase and improve our trust. I have just used examples from our past to try to show and prove to you that Jesus has never let us down in the past. What makes you think He would start now?

I SUPPOSE MANY OF YOU are familiar with what is called the “Serenity Prayer.” An important line in this little prayer is: “God grant me the grace to accept the things I cannot change.” When Jesus tells us we cannot add one moment to our life by worrying about it, He doesn’t tell us that we are not going to die. He isn’t telling us that we might not have some problem tomorrow. He does say though that if we do put God first in our lives, the rest will all be taken care of. Jesus is realistic enough to know that we may have problems. That is why He said, “Sufficient for a day is its own evil. Do not worry about tomorrow.” In the past I have to admit that I probably suffered more from things that never happened than from things that did happen. I still tend to do this, but at least I’m waking up to how foolish this is and am not doing it quite as much as I used to. I don’t hesitate to say this about myself, because I’ll bet there is at least one other person who does the same thing, probably many. We all tend to. And yet Jesus tells us not to. But if we do this, we are showing a lack of trust in God, and we don’t really get a chance to enjoy life. God didn’t intend us to be happy just in heaven. It is perfectly alright to have some happiness even now. And if you are trying to live, doing the will of God, you have a right to be happy.

I mentioned psychology and psychologists before. In no way do I want to belittle or criticize that profession. I’m sure they do much good and can often be necessary. I am sure that many of them, especially if they have the faith, would agree that fewer people would need their services if people really lived by Jesus’ advice in today’s Gospel selection. The story is told of Blessed Theresa of Calcutta. Whenever she was in a financial bind, she didn’t worry about paying the bills. She would simply say, “Oh, God has plenty of money!” I never heard of any of her foundations being taken over because of foreclosure! And if they would be, she would be able to see this as the will of God. She was certainly in a win-win situation.

The short first reading speaks of a mother’s love for her child. There was a time when the Jewish people, who in Old Testament times, were God’s chosen people, felt that God had abandoned them. The reason they felt this way was because of their sins and unfaithfulness to God. Now just because they felt that way, it did not mean that God had really forgotten or abandoned them. God has given all of us a free will, which means He can’t force us to obey Him or His commandments. But in His infinite knowledge He also knows that we might turn back to Him if certain misfortunes come our way. He also knows that no possible misfortune on this earth is as bad as our eternal condemnation. Has the thought ever struck you that the people destroyed by the flood or the destruction at Sodom and Gomorrah may all be in heaven now? I didn’t intend to turn this sermon into a ‘fire and brimstone’ sermon. But my own St. Francis told his followers that “in the preaching they do, be it done for the utility and edification of the people, announcing to them vices and virtues, punishment and glory.” In other words followers of St. Francis should preach to the people what is right and what is wrong and about heaven and hell. I don’t have to tell you what goes with what. Unfortunately we are living in a time when literally thousands of mothers every day are seemingly able to forget the child of their womb, by having it killed before it is born. We do know that when someone does that they will find it hard to live that worry free life which Jesus speaks of today. Yes, God will forgive even that sin. It’s just that the one who commits the sin will find it so hard to feel forgiven. If one avoids that sin, then that will never be a problem.


We hope you enjoyed this homily by Fr. Valentine Young, OFM.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“In all this mediaeval religious poetry there is much that we could not use now. Many of the hymns are quite bad, many are frigid compositions containing futile tricks, puns, misinterpreted quotations of Scripture, and twisted concepts, whose only point is their twist. But there is an amazing amount of beautiful poetry that we could still use. If we are to have vernacular hymns at all, why do we not have translations of the old ones?”

— Fr. Adrian Fortescue (d. 1923)

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.