• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Homily: 8th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A)

Guest Author · March 1, 2014

ODAY’S GOSPEL is a continuation of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Being God, He did not have to prepare or rehearse what He was going to say. But on the other hand, who knows, He might have spent the night before in prayer or in ‘conscious contact’ with His Heavenly Father thinking over what He was going to say to the people the next day. Now, I have to admit, this is just idle speculation on my part and you are free to take it or leave it.

The Two Masters: Probably the most puzzling word in the first part is that word ‘mammon’. One of the wonderful things about computers is that you can type in or google the word ‘mammon’ and you will have all kinds of information. In this particular case, the general idea of the word ‘mammon’ is that it refers to money, wealth and riches. Sometimes preachers will make a point of the fact that in the first case Jesus uses the words ‘hate and love’ and then He says ‘be devoted to and despise’ in the other. A thought that occurred to me was one found in Hebrew poetry, especially in the Psalms. There, frequently, the authors will try to repeat the same thing or idea but in different ways. I do think though, that when it comes to people who love money and wealth or who make money or wealth their god, that often this god does not make them happy. Instead of their money making them enjoy life, it almost seems to make them miserable. However, I do not intend to make that the main focus for today.

I have entitled the following part of my sermon or homily as the positive approach to life and happiness. Oh, if we could only really believe and trust Jesus’ words when He tells us not to worry about our lives, about what we will eat or drink or wear. I wonder if I asked you people present here: Has anyone ever been close to starving to death? Has anyone here ever not had enough clothing to wear? Has anyone here ever been homeless? I doubt if any hands would go up. We have never been anywhere near the point when we had nothing to eat, at least not for any extended period of time.

I don’t like to speak in psychological terms, since the only psychology I ever studied was the general courses which we had in the seminary. I do know that psychologists will make a distinction between what we know intellectually or in our head, and what we feel in our heart or, to speak colloquially, in our gut. I once heard this distinction made between faith and trust. The following example may bring this out. Faith exists when I believe that a tight-rope walker can push a wheel-barrow over a rope suspended high in the air. Trust would exist if I’m willing to ride in the wheel-barrow! In today’s Gospel Jesus is trying to teach us how to increase and improve our trust. I have just used examples from our past to try to show and prove to you that Jesus has never let us down in the past. What makes you think He would start now?

I SUPPOSE MANY OF YOU are familiar with what is called the “Serenity Prayer.” An important line in this little prayer is: “God grant me the grace to accept the things I cannot change.” When Jesus tells us we cannot add one moment to our life by worrying about it, He doesn’t tell us that we are not going to die. He isn’t telling us that we might not have some problem tomorrow. He does say though that if we do put God first in our lives, the rest will all be taken care of. Jesus is realistic enough to know that we may have problems. That is why He said, “Sufficient for a day is its own evil. Do not worry about tomorrow.” In the past I have to admit that I probably suffered more from things that never happened than from things that did happen. I still tend to do this, but at least I’m waking up to how foolish this is and am not doing it quite as much as I used to. I don’t hesitate to say this about myself, because I’ll bet there is at least one other person who does the same thing, probably many. We all tend to. And yet Jesus tells us not to. But if we do this, we are showing a lack of trust in God, and we don’t really get a chance to enjoy life. God didn’t intend us to be happy just in heaven. It is perfectly alright to have some happiness even now. And if you are trying to live, doing the will of God, you have a right to be happy.

I mentioned psychology and psychologists before. In no way do I want to belittle or criticize that profession. I’m sure they do much good and can often be necessary. I am sure that many of them, especially if they have the faith, would agree that fewer people would need their services if people really lived by Jesus’ advice in today’s Gospel selection. The story is told of Blessed Theresa of Calcutta. Whenever she was in a financial bind, she didn’t worry about paying the bills. She would simply say, “Oh, God has plenty of money!” I never heard of any of her foundations being taken over because of foreclosure! And if they would be, she would be able to see this as the will of God. She was certainly in a win-win situation.

The short first reading speaks of a mother’s love for her child. There was a time when the Jewish people, who in Old Testament times, were God’s chosen people, felt that God had abandoned them. The reason they felt this way was because of their sins and unfaithfulness to God. Now just because they felt that way, it did not mean that God had really forgotten or abandoned them. God has given all of us a free will, which means He can’t force us to obey Him or His commandments. But in His infinite knowledge He also knows that we might turn back to Him if certain misfortunes come our way. He also knows that no possible misfortune on this earth is as bad as our eternal condemnation. Has the thought ever struck you that the people destroyed by the flood or the destruction at Sodom and Gomorrah may all be in heaven now? I didn’t intend to turn this sermon into a ‘fire and brimstone’ sermon. But my own St. Francis told his followers that “in the preaching they do, be it done for the utility and edification of the people, announcing to them vices and virtues, punishment and glory.” In other words followers of St. Francis should preach to the people what is right and what is wrong and about heaven and hell. I don’t have to tell you what goes with what. Unfortunately we are living in a time when literally thousands of mothers every day are seemingly able to forget the child of their womb, by having it killed before it is born. We do know that when someone does that they will find it hard to live that worry free life which Jesus speaks of today. Yes, God will forgive even that sin. It’s just that the one who commits the sin will find it so hard to feel forgiven. If one avoids that sin, then that will never be a problem.


We hope you enjoyed this homily by Fr. Valentine Young, OFM.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

Many declare that Vatican Council II brought about a true springtime in the Church. Nevertheless, a growing number of Church leaders see this “springtime” as a rejection, a renunciation of her centuries-old heritage, or even as a radical questioning of her past and Tradition. Political Europe is rebuked for abandoning or denying its Christian roots; but the first to have abandoned her Christian roots and past is indisputably the post-conciliar Catholic Church.

— ‘Pope Francis’ Chief Liturgist (31 March 2017)’

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up