• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Communion in the hand?

Jeff Ostrowski · August 11, 2013

518 Holy Communion AVE YOU EVER heard somebody rail against receiving Communion in the hand in a very disagreeable way? I’m talking about when somebody uses an unpleasant manner of speech, not realizing that many good Catholics who love God are just doing what they have been taught.

I hope my article below does not come across in such a way. When speaking about “Communion in the hand” we should always be pastoral and sensitive.


DURING TODAY’S HOMILY our pastor described the proper way to receive Holy Communion. He said Catholics are allowed to receive on the tongue or in the hand. However, he mentioned recent legislation from the Vatican which says anyone receiving in the hand must place the Sanctissimum into his mouth in front of the priest or minister.

Full disclosure: I haven’t received Communion in the hand since the early 1990s. At the traditional Mass, all receive on the tongue, from an ordained minister. Nobody is allowed to touch the Sanctissimum except for ordained ministers. This is a wonderful tradition that came about over a period of centuries. It is beautiful and really helps everyone understand how sacred and special the Holy Eucharist is. We ought to have kept this tradition, but after the Second Vatican Council, permission was given for lay people to touch the Sanctissimum under certain circumstances.

I don’t really worry too much about those who receive Communion in the hand. They are free to do so under current Church law, although the way Cardinal Bernardin forced this upon the Church in America is disturbing. To learn more, Google the following terms: “Bernardin” + “Communion in the hand.”

DURING HIS HOMILY, I began asking myself: “Why would anybody receive Holy Communion in the hand?” For one thing, since the Sanctissimum must be placed in the mouth in front of the minister, why add the extra step? For another thing, our hands are so dirty. (Remember, my wife and I have two small children. Trust me: hands are normally dirty.) St. Thomas Aquinas was explaining some reasons for priests washing their hands at Mass. One reason given by the Angelic Doctor follows:

“We are not accustomed to handling precious objects unless the hands be washed; hence it seems indecent for anyone to approach so great a Sacrament with hands that are, even literally, unclean.”

I remember a very smart priest talking about the post-Conciliar “movement” in Germany for hand-Communion. One advocate made up a pamphlet with all the quotes from history “proving” the Sanctissimum was sometimes received in the hand by the early Church. It even had nice color pictures. This priest approached the author and said, “Your pamphlet is very nice, but you forgot something crucial. You forgot to include all the reasons this practice was abandoned, as the Church developed over the centuries.”

ONE OF OUR MOST POPULAR blog entries ever (shared more than 6,000 times) was the one about kneeling for Communion. Until late 2011, priests were supposed to “catechize” Catholics who knelt for Communion. However, as of 2011, this has been changed. Catholics in the USA are now free to kneel. A very kind gentleman sent me all kinds of documentation, proving that even before 2011, Catholics could kneel for Communion. I was planning on posting all of it, but I just realized doing so would be superfluous in light of this.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“It is required of a man that he should share the passion and action of his time at peril of being judged not to have lived.”

— Oliver Wendell Holmes

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Goofy 1974 Hymn • “A Man Can Kill With a Gun, a Bomb, or a Lance”
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.