• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

A Classic Example of Modal Modulation

Dr. Charles Weaver · November 12, 2023

A FEW MONTHS AGO, I wrote a post about a traditional and brief way of formulating the ethos or character associated with each of the eight modes. If you apply this way of thinking to your chanting, it can often bear a great deal of fruit for contemplation. It provides another dimension for us to think about as we approach a chant: liturgical context and meaning, melody, text setting, mode. In particular, I would like to suggest that you might get something out of adopting a dynamic rather than a static way of thinking about the modes.

Here is what I mean by a static way. What we teach our students is that we classify a melody into one of the modes by looking at its final and its range. The final is the last note of the melody, and it works like this: D is for modes 1 and 2; E is for modes 3 and 4; F is for modes 5 and 6; G is for modes 7 and 8. If a chant ends on another note, we consider it as being in a transposed version of one of the other modes. Typically C endings are mode 5, A endings are mode 2, and B endings are mode 4. The range refers to whether the final note is near the bottom of the range of pitches in the melody or somewhere in the middle. Near the bottom means an odd-numbered mode, while in the middle means an even-numbered mode. This is not really an exact science, but after spending a while with the melodies you get pretty confortable categorizing them.

In a dynamic way of thinking about the modes, we add on to what I wrote above by thinking of the modes as also having certain typical melodic patterns and certain notes that seem to anchor the mode. Often these are the same as the tenor or reciting tone of the psalm. Sometimes these are other notes, like the pitch F in the Easter introit. Sometimes a melody can visit other modes by adopting the melodic mannerisms of that mode. If you combine that with the modal ethos, you can sometimes get some real analytical insight. I know that sounds like dry theory, but I think it can be rewarding for any choir director to think this way!

A very clear example of this happened today at the communion in the ordinary form. The communion sets an excerpt from today’s gospel about the wise and foolish virgins. As usual, the Gregorian author did a great job of paraphrasing the gospel text to make a coherent and beautiful antiphon focused on one important aspect from the gospel lesson. That could be the basis for a whole other post. Anyway, the melody also moves between modes in an interesting way. First off, we have this phrase:

The antiphon is in mode 5, but if we single out this phrase, we are most certainly in mode 6, which is the mode of devotion. How fitting for the prudent virgins, who keep their vessels full of oil against the bridegroom’s coming—a praiseworthy act of devotion! When the cry comes announcing the coming of the bridegroom, it bursts forth into the fifth mode, the mode of joy:

This sudden rise up to the high E makes a really startling effect in context. As a depiction of the Lord’s coming, it it reminiscent of the image of the lightning coming from the east to the west.

Finally, we get a rather unusual (for a communion chant) melodic repetition, but with a new continuation:

On the command “go out,” the melody also goes outside of its previous limits, finding a new peak on the high F. Of course we don’t really think about chants in tonal terms, but the Schenkerian in me can’t help hearing this F as a long-term resolution to the high E in the previous phrase. If you’d rather think about this in a more historical way, we can think of the pointed character of the La on which we would sing the E in the solmization system, which finds some resolution in finally attaining the softness of the fa (F) above. Toward the cadence, the melody on the ending of “Christo” is also reminiscent of one of the formulaic phrases from fifth-mode graduals.

These are some tentative, sketchy beginnings of an analysis that occurred to me today while singing. Do you find the move from the mode of devotion to the mode of joy suggestive? For me, this kind of thinking helps me to shape the melody in my own singing.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: November 13, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Charles Weaver

Dr. Charles Weaver is on the faculty of the Juilliard School, and serves as director of music for St. Mary’s Church. He lives in Connecticut with his wife and four children.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Church officials frequently asked Tomás Luis de Victoria for his opinion on cathedral appointments because of his fame and knowledge. He was faithful to his position as convent organist even after his professional debut as an organist, and never accepted any extra pay for being a chapelmaster. Held in great esteem, his contract allowed him frequent travel away from the convent, and he attended Palestrina’s funeral (in Rome) in 1594.”

— ‘Dr. Robert Stevenson, 1961 (mod.)’

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.