• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Some Thoughts on Gregorian Modal Ethos

Dr. Charles Weaver · June 29, 2023

IN The Republic, Plato goes into some detail about what types of music are allowed in his idealized, just society. In particular, only certain musical modes are permitted:

Next as to the music. A song or ode has three parts,—the subject, the harmony, and the rhythm; of which the two last are dependent upon the first. As we banished strains of lamentation, so we may now banish the mixed Lydian harmonies, which are the harmonies of lamentation; and as our citizens are to be temperate, we may also banish convivial harmonies, such as the Ionian and pure Lydian. Two remain—the Dorian and Phrygian, the first for war, the second for peace; the one expressive of courage, the other of obedience or instruction or religious feeling.

Each of these different modes is associated with a particular character of emotion, affect, or sentiment. With these associations, Plato is inaugurating a musical tradition that has continued throughout the subsequent history of Western music. I think this is something that church musicians should care about, and I will try to convince you of this in what follows. The question came up in my classes at the recent Sacred Music Symposium, and I hope what I had to offer on the subject was of some use for the participants.

What is a mode? Used as a musical term, mode is quite difficult to define. Some people like to think of them as “scales,” where a particular collection of pitches provide the color palette, so to speak, that a composer can use to create a melody. But that doesn’t really begin to describe the complexity of any real music. Most classical music is written in either the major or the minor mode, but of course almost no classical music is limited to those particular scales. Modality embodies more than a scale, then. It is better to say that the scale is part of a more complex way of thinking about a piece that also encompasses harmonic progression, tonal conventions, and melodic patterns. Different modal traditions exist in music from all around the world, but this definition gets us started.

When we apply this to Gregorian chant, we see a wider variety of modes than in classical music. In spite of some theoretical conventions, a real survey of the phenomenon of modality as it arises in Gregorian melodies would be quite difficult, since the repertoire is quite old and developed over a long period. I’m not going to discuss any of that here, but if you are interested in such things as archaic modality and the development of the melodies along those lines, you might want to look at the theories laid out by Dom Jean Claire. The best place to start is probably this book by Dom Saulnier.

Instead, I’m going to take the more conventional view. In contrast to the rather impoverished set of two modes, as in classical music, we traditionally think of Gregorian chant as coming in eight modes. To lay out this theory in the simplest terms, the modes are determined by the last note (the “final”) of the melody. Melodies that end on D (re) are in modes 1 or 2; melodies that end on E (mi) are in modes 3 or 4; melodies that end of F (fa) are in modes 5 or 6; and melodies that end on G (sol) are in modes 7 or 8. Whether a particular melody is in an odd-numbered (authentic) mode or an even-numbered (plagal) one is determined by the range of the melody (i.e., how high or low it goes). In general, authentic modes have a range mostly above the final note, while plagal modes have a range that does not go as high above the final note but also goes below. Each mode is associated with a psalm tone, so that an antiphon in mode 1 will be placed with a psalm chanted to the first tone, and so on. These modes and tones were hugely influential on the subsequent history of music, and they have deep connections not only to sixteenth-century polyphony but to much later music as well. Here we will only stick to Gregorian chant.

You don’t need to know all this theory to figure out what mode a particular Gregorian melody is in. Most modern editions of chant will just tell you, near the beginning of the piece. And in the post-Gregorio world we live in, it’s quite easy to have software generate the right psalm tone, fully pointed. So why bother with modal theory?

For me, the answer relates to Plato’s discussion above. Each Gregorian mode has its own particular character, in a way that goes much deeper than the major-happy/minor-sad dichotomy. What kind of character? The same as what Plato describes? Sadly, no. The modes Plato was discussing were not really the same as the Gregorian modes, despite the similarity in some of the nomenclature. But by immemorial custom, each of the Gregorian modes has a particular ethos or character associated with it. One problem with trying to ascertain these characters is that different authors have written quite different (sometimes contradictory) things about modal ethos. One writer’s warlike mode might be another writer’s mode of peace, etc.

In light of these contradictions, we might just throw up our hands and say, “Nobody agrees about this stuff anyway so it doesn’t matter; let’s just list what the theorists say and not put much faith in it.” This is a fine scholarly point of view to adopt. But as a practical church musician, I’m going to suggest a different path. There is one very simple list that dates from at least the eighteenth century (published, at any rate, by Pierre-Nicolas Poisson then) and that exists in the oral tradition. If you want a place to start with a practical approach to particular characters of each mode, this is it:

  1. gravis (serious)
  2. tristis (sad, mournful)
  3. mysticus (mystical)
  4. harmonicus (harmonic or harmonious)
  5. laetus (happy, joyful)
  6. devotus (devotional or devout)
  7. angelicus (angelic)
  8. perfectus (perfect)

I find this list quite good, provided that we take it in the right spirit. Let’s think of these characters as a starting place for contemplation rather than as definitive analytical statements, or even definitive embodiments of medieval teaching. If you want to go deeper into the older writers, feel free. It is also possible to go quite deep into this particular list as well. The Saulnier book mentioned above contains absolutely beautiful reflections on each of these eight sentiments by Canon Jean Jeanneteau. Jeanneteau’s commentary is given in the spirit of deep reflection and piety that is so characteristic of much of the oral tradition surrounding the liturgical performance of Gregorian chant. I hope this list brings you and your schola more deeply into the spirit of the music!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: June 30, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Charles Weaver

Dr. Charles Weaver is on the faculty of the Juilliard School, and serves as director of music for St. Mary’s Church. He lives in Connecticut with his wife and four children.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “What Martin Luther Said…”
    My pastor asked me to write little columns for the bulletin each week. The article for 20 July 2025 has been posted, and it’s called: “What Luther Said…” Martin Luther (an ex-priest and apostate) was an infamous heretic whose ignorance of JESUS CHRIST was only exceeded by his filthy and disgusting vulgarity.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 15th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time (13 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and propers for this Sunday are also provided at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    15th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    This coming Sunday—13 July 2025—is the 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). All the chants have been conveniently assembled and posted at the feasts website. The OFFERTORY, Ad Te Levávi, is particularly beautiful.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Only against this background, of the effective denial of the authority of Trent, can one understand the bitterness of the struggle against allowing the celebration of Mass according to the 1962 Missal after the liturgical reform. The possibility of so celebrating constitutes the strongest, and thus (for them) the most intolerable contradiction of the opinion of those who believe that the faith in the Eucharist, as formulated by Trent, has lost its validity.”

— Cardinal Ratzinger, 2001

Recent Posts

  • PDF Download • “Catholic Texts Transcend”
  • PDF Download • “Jeff’s Mom Joins Our Fundraiser”
  • “Musicam Sacram” (5 March 1967) • Does It Apply?
  • “What Martin Luther Said…”
  • “Music List” • 15th in Ordinary Time (Year C)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up