• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

7 Suggestions • “Winning the Sacred Music Crusade”

Jeff Ostrowski · May 10, 2023

OW MANY YOUNG MEN are taught about “custody of the eyes” in today’s Catholic institutions? My hope would be 100%. How many are reminded about their life’s primary cross? Again, my hope would be 100%—but I have no way of knowing the truth. In a nutshell, when it comes to young men (who aren’t yet married), each day’s “primary cross” is to forcefully reject any temptations against the Virtue of Holy Purity. Custody of the eyes (custodia oculorum) plays a role in this. When a Catholic observes something which may offend against the Holy Purity, he must avert his eyes. According to FATHER VALENTINE YOUNG, it’s not always possible to completely banish certain thoughts from one’s mind. Nevertheless, PADRE PIO reminds us that sin is in the will. God sees our will, our intentions, and our struggles.

Pornography Plague • Society formerly made it more difficult for men to commit sins of impurity. Evil magazines could be purchased through the USPS mail, but there was always a risk that others might see their actions. These days, however, any child with an iPhone can instantly access insane amounts of pornography with the click of a button. (For the record, growing up the 1990s I recall television commercials and billboards that were akin to “soft” porn.) In the same way that SAINT DAMIEN OF MOLOKAI created a special ministry for lepers, perhaps someone should start a ministry dedicated to fighting porn addiction, which has become an epidemic. It’s important that youngsters never feel too ashamed to bring sins of impurity to the confessional. No matter what the sin is, I’d bet money the priest behind the grate has heard sins a billion times worse!

Those Who Wear Red • In Dr. Tappan’s “Open Letter to Discouraged Musicians,” he reminded us that dwelling on church leaders’ scandalous statements is an improper use of time. Even if we were to spend five hours each day gossiping and complaining, it wouldn’t accomplish anything. In my own life, I’ve noticed I become depressed whenever I dwell on Vatican scandals. In particular, there’s a cardinal—currently the head of a Vatican dicastery—who uses tithes from the faithful to travel around demoralizing parishes, sowing division, attacking family life, making scandalous statements, and even uttering blasphemies in public. I can’t understand why he’s not been removed. Cardinals wear red because they’re supposed to be willing to lay down their lives for JESUS CHRIST—but this man is actively harming the Church! To keep my sanity (and I am dead serious when I say this) I have been treating Vatican scandals as if they were temptations against the Virtue of Holy Purity. Whenever I’m tempted to think about that particular cardinal, for example, I banish him from my mind—as if he were a filthy image in a Playboy magazine.

What Therefore Shall We Do? • Peter said to Jesus (Matthew 19:27): “Behold we have left all things, and have followed Thee: what therefore shall we have?” Modifying the words slightly, the reader might ask: “Behold, Jeff, we are resigned to the reality of scandals in the church: what therefore shall we do?” Should we twiddle our thumbs? Should we give up? What does God expect from us during our brief sojourn on this earth? One thing we’ve learned over the last sixty years is that many who hold authority in the Catholic Church possess zero interest in following the mandates of the Second Vatican Council. We can quote Vatican II until we’re blue in the face, yet—for reasons unknown—our leaders are fine with contradicting its explicit mandates. What therefore shall we do?

Seven (7) Suggestions:

(1) Learning From Dr. Marier • One model we can look to is DR. THEODORE MARIER, who lived during a very difficult period. For instance, in spite of everything Vatican II mandated, in 1977 Monsignor Francis P. Schmitt pointed out: “As late as the spring of 1976, a midwest archbishop told the public press that the pope had ordered Mass to be said in English, and that any Latin liturgy needed specific authorization from his chancery!” But in the midst of such craziness, Dr. Marier was able to build something beautiful, powerful, and life-giving. At the Sacred Music Symposium this summer, Richard J. Clark will give a presentation about the accomplishments of Dr. Marier.

(2) Jeff’s Tactic • Our Lord said (Matthew 10:16): “Be ye wise as serpents and simple as doves.” A conscientious choirmaster feels called by God to restore dignified music to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. After all, if we truly believe what we say we believe about the SANCTISSIMUM, how can we allow goofy, off-Broadway, secular, casual music at Mass? Father Robert Skeris used to say: “If it sounds like a toothpaste commercial, it doesn’t belong at Mass.” How can we help more priests to understand this? How can we help priests to appreciate authentic sacred music? I would humbly suggest we make sure our musical offerings are a delight for the listener. In the past, I have emphasized how important it is to employ diverse music (because of today’s short attention span). For instance, last Sunday we sang a mediæval AGNUS DEI, and here’s a live recording:

*  Mp3 Download • MEDIAEVAL AGNUS DEI

(3) Clever Congregational Participation • Pope Pius XII made it clear that there’s more than one “correct” way to assist at Mass. He said the faithful will participate differently, depending upon a variety of factors. Pope Pius XII said that for some people, devotions focusing on the Lord’s Passion constitute appropriate participation, whereas others should strive to follow the prayers being said by the priest at the altar. This is common sense. After all, an illiterate person with very little education will not participate in the sacred rites the same way that Father Adrian Fortescue—who had three doctorates—would participate. Unfortunately, this wisdom is no longer in vogue. The reformers, believing themselves to be more enlightened than the saints of old, rigidly declared that all Catholics must participate in the liturgical rites in exactly same way. We may disagree with this state of affairs, but this is the situation we face. Therefore, if we expect to be successful in our vocation, we must devise ways to include (when possible) the congregation. The following demonstrates one possible method. The hymn tune “OLD HUNDREDTH” can first be sung the normal way. Then, however, the Tenor line can form the basis for polyphony:

 Rehearsal videos for each individual voice await you at #40691.

(4) What My Brother Said • I have a brother who’s a priest. He’s also a fantastic musician. Many years ago, I showed him one of my compositions to get his feedback. He replied: “Jeff, this is in a minor key. Your composition will put everyone in a bad mood. Then it will put them to sleep. Don’t you have anything that sounds happy?” His words were actually quite wise. I personally love “melancholy” music—but not everyone does. My brother’s words made me realize how important it is to select some “happy” songs for each Mass. Below is a live recording of my volunteer choir singing a hymn during last Sunday’s Mass. Notice that it’s bright and happy:

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

(5) Don’t Fall Into A Rut! • Father Valentine Young said over and over: “Don’t rehearse music to death. Gregorian Chant sounds better when the singers are just a little bit unsure.” I think his point was that we must avoid letting our singers fall into a rut. Let me give you an example of what I’m talking about. Last Sunday, I approached a Cantor during the homily and said: “I want you to lead CREDO IV.” Years ago, we did CREDO IV all the time—but that was a long time ago. So, I accompanied CREDO IV on the organ, the Cantor lead each verse, and everyone else responded. I was quite pleased with how it came out (below). I think stuff like this can help make sure choirs don’t fall into a rut:

Here’s the direct URL link.

(6) Something I’ll Never Forget • For several years, I worked as an assistant in a cathedral church. [The same director had been serving there since before I was born.] This cathedral was considered to have excellent congregational participation—but I was puzzled. The Masses were broadcast each week, and I noticed three things: (1) The Sunday Mass had very low attendance, in spite of the massive choir; (2) The people in the pews were mainly elderly; (3) Virtually nobody in the congregation sang along with anything. Eventually, I realized something which I’ll never forget. When the choir was loud, the bishop (or rector) celebrating Mass erroneously believed the congregation was participating in the singing. Moreover, the Celebrant tended to confuse “congregational participation” with “familiar songs I recognize.” Therefore, choirmasters should realize priests like to hear songs they know. (Keeping your priest happy is part of keeping your job.) Contrariwise, many priests don’t like to hear a whole bunch of songs they don’t recognize. When that happens, they will often call you into the office and tell you: “The people aren’t participating because they don’t know the songs you choose.” That’s why I strongly recommend making sure you include familiar pieces in your repertoire choices. Below is a live recording of my volunteer choir from last Sunday. I think you’ll recognize the tune, which was written by César Franck’s teacher:

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

(7) Never Choose Junk! • Finally, even if you choose a song that’s very simple, never let it be junk. To illustrate what I’m talking about, consider the hymn below. It’s a wonderful translation of REGINA COELI JUBILA. The melody is straightforward, yet the language is quite elevated. For instance, the fifth verse says: “His eyes, once foully spit upon, the daystar’s glances render wan.” According to the footnote in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal, it’s a poetic translation for Turbata sputis lumina | Phoebea vincunt fulgura. That is to say: “The eyes of the risen Lord are so bright that in comparison the light of the sun (Daystar) seems weak and pale.”

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

Conclusion • My colleague, Corrinne May, said that I need to do a better job ending my articles; and she’s correct. Therefore, let me now summarize my article. In this article, I attempted to provide ideas about how a conscientious choirmaster can help those in authority come to a deeper appreciation of authentic sacred music. My intention was not to put forward ways to “trick” people. Rather, I am providing tools to help make sure we put our best foot forward. After all, if we get fired by our boss because he says “our” music is too esoteric, too complicated, and too abstruse, we won’t be able to do any good at all. I’m not saying we should compromise our artistic vision. I’m saying that we must be “wise as serpents” in today’s environment. We must never fail to assess how our music is received by the congregation (which doesn’t always match what we imagine inside our head). We must realize that—with a little thought—we can find ways to make authentic sacred music accessible, special, and moving for the people in the pews.

Why Jeff Writes • Our Blessed Lord said (John 16:12): “I have yet many things to say to you: but you cannot bear them now.” Whenever I write, my objective is to provide reflections that will help our readers. I try not to prattle on. On the other hand, there are many topics I would love to write about someday—but only if the Lord provides the opportunity. Thank you for your support. And thank you for reading what I have to say!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured, PDF Download Tagged With: Custodia Oculorum, Custody Of The Eyes, Holy Virtue of Purity, Latin Mass Musical Diversity, Old 100th Hymn, Old Hundredth Hymn, Regina Coeli Jubila Last Updated: May 11, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“There is no music worth hearing save that written in the last 40 years.”

— Johannes Tinctoris (1477)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up