• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

We’re a 501(c)3 public charity established in 2006. We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and run no advertisements. We exist solely by the generosity of small donors.

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Blase Cardinal Cupich Responds Directly to Me!

Jeff Ostrowski · November 10, 2022

N ONE of my articles, published on 22 September 2022, I provided a 1955 citation. The citation was pretty rare. (I’ve been involved with liturgical projects since the 1990s, and I’ve never seen it cited.) A perceptive reader alerted me to this article published on 11-2-2022 by Cardinal Cupich, which in all likelihood was submitted a few weeks in advance—i.e. shortly after my article appeared. A few weeks is standard, to allow for typesetting and proofreading.

Insane Coincidence? • Thanks be to God, I have become very careful vis-à-vis what I publish about other people. Calumny is a serious sin, for which reparation is virtually impossible. However, it’s difficult to believe Cardinal Cupich’s piece was written independently of my article because of the timing, and because of how rare that quote was. I will not insult your intelligence by telling you what I suspect. Whether deliberate or not, Cardinal Cupich responds directly to me. Compare Green to Green, Yellow to Yellow, Pink to Pink, and Blue to Blue:

I don’t have time to respond to Cardinal Cupich’s response to my article. Briefly, however, consider the following:

(1) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II mandated “recitation of the creed.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. Catholics were allowed to recite the Creed along with the priest before Vatican II. Moreover, the reformers deliberately limited the recitation of the Creed. At Maria Laach Conference in 1951, progressives pushing for liturgical reform declared (resolution #6): “The recitation of the Creed should occur much less frequently.”

(2) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II mandated “a fixed altar from which the priest would face the people.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. Vatican II said not one word about destroying the beautiful high altars or Mass “facing the people.” As a matter of fact, to this day, the Ordinary Form Missal presumes celebration ad orientem.

(3) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II was about: “moving from Latin to the vernacular.”

The opposite is true. Vatican II required that Latin be retained and that Gregorian Chant be given “first place” in liturgical services. The retention of Latin was not a suggestion or recommendation—it was required by the Council.

(4) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II restored “processions of gifts and the Gospels.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. The Missale Vetustum had a splendid Gospel procession.

(5) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II restored “reciting in unison the Lord’s Prayer.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. The Missale Vetustum allows that practice at Low Mass, and divides the singing at High Mass—i.e. the Celebrant sings one section of the Lord’s Prayer, and the congregation sings the other section.

(6) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II restored “singing together.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. The Missale Vetustum not only allows, but even requires such a practice at High Mass.

(7) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II restored “periods of common silence.”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. I’m not even going to comment on such an assertion!

(8) Cardinal Cupich claims Vatican II restored a practice that takes place “in the eucharistic prayer, the […] people respond in the preface…”

Cardinal Cupich is mistaken. The Missale Vetustum requires that the entire congregation respond to the priest at the Preface, and it’s one of the most beautiful parts of the Mass: Habémus ad Dóminum…

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Archbishop Blase J Cupich, Blase Cardinal Cupich Last Updated: October 18, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Luis Martínez Must Go!
    Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!
    A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Booklet of Eucharistic Hymns” (16 pages)
    I was asked to create a booklet for my parish to use during our CORPUS CHRISTI PROCESSION on 22 June 2025. Would you be willing to look over the DRAFT BOOKLET (16 pages) I came up with? I tried to include a variety of hymns: some have a refrain; some are in major, others in minor; some are metered, others are plainsong; some are in Spanish, some are in Latin, but most are in English. Normally, we’d use the Brébeuf Hymnal—but we can’t risk having our congregation carry those heavy books all over the city to various churches.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Naturally the accompaniment of the organ is merely tolerated during the office of the dead, but in fact, in nearly every parish this toleration has become a habit.”

— Henri Potiron, 1958

Recent Posts

  • Hidden Gem: Ascendit Deus (Dalitz)
  • PDF Download • Soprano Descant — “Hail, Holy Queen Enthroned Above”
  • “Dom Jausions had a skilled hand. His transcriptions are masterpieces of neatness & precision.”
  • Pope Leo XIV pays tribute to Palestrina
  • PDF Download • Palestrina’s “Ave Maria”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up