• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Seriously? • Bishop of Lexington Insists the Dominican Rite Never Existed (!)

Jeff Ostrowski · February 4, 2022

EFORE I GO ANY FURTHER, let me be clear. Our organization has one goal: to promote the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. Servite Domino in lætitia. Just because we promote authentic sacred music, that doesn’t mean we’re somehow “heroic.” Indeed, we are unprofitable servants; we have done that which we ought to do (Lk 17:10). It is not our mission to pick fights, snipe on Facebook, post “hot takes” on Twitter, or destroy anyone’s reputation. For all these years, we have been producing thousands and thousands of free liturgical resources—and we’ve only just begun!

Once In A Blue Moon: Every so often, however, something comes my way which I feel obligated to address—and it happened recently with a directive sent out by Most Rev’d John Stowe (bishop of Lexington, KY) on 2 February 2022. Bishop Stowe’s statement denies the existence of variations (a.k.a uses, forms, rites, and so forth) for the Roman Rite, which have existed for at least 800 years. No historian—as far as I know—would agree with these irresponsible assertions by Bishop Stowe:

*  PDF Download • Statement from Lexington’s Bishop
—Written Statement by Most Rev’d John Stowe • 2 February 2022.

The Catholic Faith: Nothing in the Catholic Faith says we must accept something we know to be false. In the future, I will speak more about this (if I can find the time). For instance, if a bishop declares the liturgical reform to be “irreversible,” we need not agree. After all, so many elements of the liturgical reform have already been reversed and “re-reversed.” None but a fool embraces demonstrable falsehoods. The leaders in the Catholic Church are not perfect; one of the first bishops (Judas Iscariot) betrayed Our Redeemer for thirty pieces of silver! We have a duty to pray for our leaders precisely because they make mistakes. Even popes make mistakes. In the history of the Church, there have been repugnant popes; Google “Cadaver Synod” if you don’t believe me. During some periods, decades went by without Catholics even knowing who the true pope was (on account of anti-popes). Even smart people like Bernard of Clairvaux made erroneous judgments vis-à-vis anti-popes. And some popes even committed horrible sins against the Sixth Commandment.

Oleaginous Sycophants: When Bishop Stowe denies the existence of historical variations (Sarum, Lyons, Paris, Ordinariate, Braga, Dominican, etc.) he’s incorrect. It is true that certain Roman Rite “variants” are insignificant; an example would be Franciscan modifications to the CONFITEOR. It is also true that some “variants” are so substantial they almost constitute a different rite. In other words, there’s an entire spectrum of rites, uses, forms, and variants—all under the umbrella of the Roman Rite. To suggest that the Dominican Rite is one of the Eastern rites … that’s just insane. The Dominican Rite is clearly a variant of the Roman Rite. The existence of these variants, uses, rites, and forms has never been considered deleterious to Church unity. Vatican II solemnly declared: “Holy Mother Church holds all lawfully acknowledged rites to be of equal right and dignity, and wishes to preserve them in the future and to foster them in every way.” How is it possible that Bishop Stowe made such assertions publicly? When a bishop is consecrated, someone usually reminds the new bishop that “nobody will ever again tell you the truth again.” In other words, craven “yes-men” exist. Obsequious sycophants exist. Fawning brown-nosers exist. I suspect Bishop Stowe was ill-served by a ghost writer. Regardless, these problematic assertions by Bishop Stowe will have to be withdrawn at some point.

Disagreements Are Okay: Directly on the PDF file (see above) I scrawled some thoughts. I have no idea how coherent my thoughts are… If you think I’m wrong, please let me know! Why do so many fear honest debate? Consider this quote by Dom André Mocquereau:

“Opposition has always been precious to me. It forced me to dig down to rock bottom and to leave nothing to possibility or even probability. Without the opposition, I might never have done all that work.”

Dom Mocquereau certainly made mistakes, but he was a tough character! He’d been a soldier in the Franco-Prussian War and got injured. If you think it was fun to be injured in those days, think again! Warfare back then was brutal. And during WW2, many of the monks of Solesmes Abbey were forced to fight against Hitler. At least seventeen—including the Prior, the Subprior, and even the organist—were captured by the Germans and spent time as prisoners of war. (Did they still pray their office?) Dom Turpault was killed at the Battle of Dunkirk.

Exsultabunt sancti in gloria; lætabuntur in cubilibus suis.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles, PDF Download Tagged With: Bishop John Eric Stowe, Bishop of Lexington, Dom Mocquereau, John Stowe Ad Orientem, John Stowe Bans Birettas, Solesmes Abbey, Traditionis Custodes Motu Proprio Last Updated: February 11, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Oh, what sighs I uttered, what tears I shed, to mingle with the waters of the torrent, while I chanted to Thee, O my God, the psalms of Holy Church in the Office of the Dead!

— ‘Isaac Jogues, upon finding Goupil’s corpse (1642)’

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.