• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Extra” Offertory & Communion Verses in the Saint Edmund Campion Missal (3rd Edition)

Jeff Ostrowski · March 11, 2021

E HAVE OBTAINED permission from Sophia Institute Press to release some details about the (forthcoming) third edition of the Saint Edmund Campion Missal. I’m part of a team that’s been working on this for about four years. Every page has been completely overhauled, using suggestions received since the book was first released nine years ago. This is not an “adjustment”—it’s a complete renovation.

*  PDF Download • Campion Missal, Third Edition
—The third edition of the Campion Missal will include, as an option, the Pre-1955 Holy Week (with a fabulous & rare translation into English), the “new” Prefaces and Feasts (cf. Vatican decree dated 22 February 2020), and spectacular new features.

The third edition is much thinner (50% less heavy), and the typesetting is breathtaking. The 2nd edition was also a gorgeous book:

I’ve seen drafts of the forthcoming edition: the improvements are spectacular!

Want to help proofread? Write to dom.mocquereau@gmail.com.

What Are The Improvements?

Some improvements have already been revealed: The Pre-1955 Holy Week (in addition to the 1962), the seven optional Prefaces added 22 February 2020, and so forth. But something which has not been revealed has to do with the communion antiphons, and today I’ll be explaining that. It’s hard to know where to begin, so let me say that in 1953, Pope Pius XII changed the fasting rules—with a document called “CHRISTUS DOMINUS”—making it a lot easier to receive Holy Communion. Previously, Holy Communion for the Faithful had mainly been distributed outside of Mass, or even during Mass (!) at a side altar. In 1958, five years later, Pope Pius XII quoted the Council of Trent in De Musica Sacra Et Sacra Liturgia. Specifically, he quoted S. Conc. Trent Session 22, chapter 6: “It is very fitting and is in fact established by the liturgy, that the people should present themselves at the communion rail after the priest has consumed the sacred species on the altar.”

Versus Ad Communionem: In that same 1958 document, Pope Pius XII declared (§27c): “If the faithful are to communicate, the singing of the Communion antiphon is to begin when the priest distributes Holy Communion. If this Communion antiphon has been taken from some psalm, the other verses of the same psalm may be sung, in which case the antiphon may be repeated after every one or two verses and, the Communion over, the psalm should be concluded with the Gloria Patri and the repeated antiphon. But if the antiphon is not taken from a psalm, one may choose a psalm fitting to the solemnity of the liturgical action.”

Where Did Pius XII Get That? Many people already knew the Offertory had “extra verses”—mysteriously eliminated about 700 years ago—but what about the communion antiphons? Did Pius XII just make that up? It turns out, all the communion antiphons had “extra verses” about a millennium ago. (There are various theories as to why these fell by the wayside.) You can download a very interesting publication by Solesmes Abbey which appeared before the 1958 document of Pope Pius XII:

*  PDF Download • “Communion Verses” (22 August 1957)
—Published by the Abbey of Solesmes before the 1958 document of Pius XII.

Other Publications: More publications would follow, containing these “extra verses” for Communion. On 17 January 1962, Solesmes Abbey published Versus Psalmorum Et Canticorum, which Jeffrey Tucker scanned and placed online. In 2010, Mr. Richard Rice—who assisted Dr. Ruth Steiner with the CANTUS database at CUA—compiled a collection of these extra verses for Communion, and this was also placed online. JUSTITIAS BOOKS (under the guidance of Mr. Kyle Lartigue) published a collection called “Ad Communionem” in 2017, and you can view a sample page. Mr. Anton Stingl of Freiburg created a book called “Versus Ad Communionem” which follows in the footsteps of Father Michael Hermesdorff of Trier, placing adiastematic notation (written inexactly) above the box notation. You can view a sample page of Stingl’s oeuvre. The 1974 edition of the Graduale Romanum also indicates extra communion verses by means of tiny numbers which were copied from the 1970 Ordo Cantus Missæ.

Are These Publications Identical? Unlike the “extra verses” for the Offertories, the additional verses for Communion show occasional diversity. That’s where we come to the third edition of the Campion Missal, which chose a noteworthy path. The Campion editorial team has included the ancient communion verses—in italics, because they are not obligatory—and has taken them from the full repertoire, demonstrating how universal this practice was. A major problem with certain Gregorian publications has been a failure to take into consideration the entire repertoire. Too many authors decide which manuscript is “the best” or “most authentic specimen” based upon which MS is the cleanest or most accessible. But clever people realize that one should never determine the value of a particular MS based on “how clean it is.” For example, Chartres 47 is not as beautiful as other MSS, but it’s still incredibly valuable.

Manuscripts: the More the Merrier!

Each MS is a little different, so it’s necessary to calibrate for each one. For instance, Einsiedeln 121 (from approximately 961AD) uses vowels to notate the psalms, so one must possess a good working knowledge of the Psalter to decipher it:

San Gall #381—created sometime around 928AD—was described by Dr. Peter Wagner as follows: “This manuscript contains, among other things, the complete Introit and Communion verses of the liturgical year, expressed with neumes.” This MS, which Dr. Wagner correctly calls “a precious memorial,” also appeared in the Jogues Illuminated Missal, Gradual, and Lectionary on page 270—and you will definitely want to check this out:

*  PDF Download • Jogues Missal (Pages 270-271)
—Nicene Creed in Latin and Greek in San Gall 381.

When most people want communion verses, they go straight to San Gall #381 because it’s incredibly clean. Here’s the Communion Antiphon Cantábo Dómino paired with Psalm 12 (“Úsquequo Dómine Oblivísceris Me”):

But the Campion editors believe it’s a mistake to grab only the easiest, cleanest, most accessible MSS.

To Give An Example

I could easily provide 1,000 examples where all the various MSS match—even “Old Roman” manuscripts! Generally speaking, they match whenever the Communion Antiphon is taken from a Psalm. But you know I’m not the type of person who would take the easy route! Let’s examine a Communion Antiphon that doesn’t come from a Psalm: Qui Manducat from the 9th Sunday after Pentecost. The text is John 6:57. Before I go any further, I must mention something funky: In many ancient MSS, this Communion Antiphon was assigned to the 15th Sunday after Pentecost. (That’s important to remember if you’re trying to search for it.) “Qui Manducat” is identical to the Communion Antiphon for Thursday in the 2nd Week of Lent. 1

A manuscript from Toulouse, created about 1128AD, matches “Qui Manducat” with John 6:52 (Panis quem ego dabo, caro mea est pro mundi vita), which is from the New Testament:

Other ancient MSS follow the (ancient and very common) practice of taking the verses from the Introit—and we observe that they all take from Thursday in the 2nd Week of Lent, not the Sunday after Pentecost…which is remarkable. The following MS, created circa 905AD just north of Nuremberg (Germany), takes from the Introit itself:

San Gall #376, created in Switzerland approximately 1052AD, takes from the Introit itself:

This French manuscript, created circa 1079AD about eight miles from Paris, takes from the Introit verses, not the antiphon:

Chartres 47, created around 957AD, indicates the Introit verses, not the antiphon:

A manuscript created in North Rhine-Westphalia (North Germany) around the year 1026AD takes the verses from both the Introit’s antiphon and the Introit’s verses:

Other ancient MSS follow a different practice (which was also common) where Psalm 33 is used when the Communion Antiphon is not derived from a psalm. An example would be the Saint Denis Missal, created around 988AD, which has verse 12 from Psalm 33:

A manuscript from Noyon (France) created circa 965AD also has verse 12 from Psalm 33:

Einsiedeln 121—created around 961AD in Einsiedeln (Switzerland)—also has verse 12 from psalm 33:

But there are still more options. For example, San Gall #381 provides a variety of different psalms from which to choose.

Conclusion

The third edition of the Campion Missal contains powerful and ancient “extra verses” for Communion. It carefully prints—in a very small font—the name of the manuscript chosen, allowing the Faithful to know that this is not a hypothetical exercise. I have shown (above) an example where there are different options. Nevertheless, as Father Adrian Fortescue wrote: “It remains, of course, true that any part of Scripture may be read with profit on any day.”


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Some scholars believe the Thursday Mass stole its Proprum Missæ from the Sunday after Pentecost, but there’s evidence the reverse is true. We’re not going to spend time arguing about that, because much of the ancient liturgy is shrouded in mystery. But there is evidence which challenges the conventional wisdom.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles, PDF Download Tagged With: Campion Third Edition, Extra Verses Communion, St Edmund Campion Missal Hymnal, Versus ad Communionem Last Updated: February 1, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
    I have argued that the OFFERTORY—at least in its ancient form—is more of a responsory than an antiphon. The 1962 Missal specifically calls it “Antiphona ad Offertorium.” From now on, I plan to use this beautiful setting (PDF) at funerals, since it cleverly inserts themes from the absolution of the body. Tons more research needs to be done on the OFFERTORY, which often is a ‘patchwork’ stitching together various beginnings and endings of biblical verses. For instance, if you examine the ancient verses for Dómine, vivífica me (30th Sunday in Ordinary Time) you’ll discover this being done in a most perplexing way. Rebecca Maloy published a very expensive book on the OFFERTORY, but it was a disappointment. Indeed, I can’t think of a single valuable insight contained in her book. What a missed opportunity!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
    As a RECESSIONAL on All Souls’ Day (November 2nd), we will sing In Paradísum Dedúcant Te Ángeli (PDF). When it comes to Gregorian Chant, this is one of the most popular “songs.” Frankly, all the prayers and chants from the traditional REQUIEM MASS (Missa exsequialis or Missa pro defunctis) are incredibly powerful and never should’ve been scuttled. Click here to hear “In Paradisum” in a recording I made this afternoon. Professor Louis Bouyer spoke of the way Bugnini “scuttled the office of the dead” in this fascinating excerpt from his memoirs. In his book, La riforma litugica (1983), Bugnini bragged—in quite a shameful way—about eliminating the ancient funeral texts, and even admitted those venerable texts were “beloved” (his word) by Catholics.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • All Souls (2 November)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 2 November 2025, which is the Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (“All Souls”). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the top-notch feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. In my humble opinion, it’s weird to have the feast of All Saints on a Sunday. No wonder the close associate of Pope Saint Paul VI said the revised KALENDAR was “the handiwork of a trio of maniacs.” However, I can’t deny that sometimes the sacred liturgy consists of elements that are seemingly contradictory: e.g. the Mode 7 “De Profúndis” ALLELUIA, or the Mode 8 “Dulce lignum” ALLELUIA on the various ancient feasts of the Holy Cross (3 May, 14 September, and so on).
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“I have devoted myself too much, I think, to Bach, to Mozart and to Liszt. I wish now that I could emancipate myself from them. Schumann is no use to me any more, Beethoven only with an effort and strict selection. Chopin has attracted and repelled me all my life; and I have heard his music too often—prostituted, profaned, vulgarized … I do not know what to choose for a new repertory!”

— Ferruccio Busoni (to a colleague in 1922, when he was 56 years old)

Recent Posts

  • Never Work For A Priest Or Bishop Who Believes Sacred Music Should Be “Entertainment”
  • When Pilgrims Sing, the World Disappears
  • “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
  • “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
  • The Beauty of the Propers for All Souls’ Day (and the Requiem Mass)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.