• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Gifts of Abel the Just

Fr. David Friel · July 19, 2020

N UNCOMMON link unites today’s celebration of the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Roman Rite. On most Sundays, there is not a direct correspondence between the orations (i.e., the collect, super oblata, and post-communion) used in the two forms of the Roman Rite. Today, however, exactly the same prayer is used both as the secret for the 7th Sunday after Pentecost (EF) and the prayer over the offerings for the 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time (OF). Not only is this correspondence out of the ordinary, but the text of the prayer, itself, is rather unusual.

The Sacrifice of Cain and Abel, by Mariotto Albertinelli

Here is the text, along with the present English translation (ICEL, 2010):

Deus, qui legalium differentiam hostiarum
unius sacrificii perfectione sanxisti,
accipe sacrificium a devotis tibi famulis,
et pari benedictione, sicut munera Abel, sanctifica,
ut, quod singuli obtulerunt ad maiestatis tuae honorem,
cunctis proficiat ad salutem.

O God, who in the one perfect sacrifice
brought to completion varied offerings of the law,
accept, we pray, this sacrifice from your faithful servants
and make it holy, as you blessed the gifts of Abel,
so that what each has offered to the honor of your majesty
may benefit the salvation of all.

Particularly unusual for a super oblata is the mention of the Old Testament character Abel and the gifts he offered. A very similar allusion finds expression in the Roman Canon, which asks God to look upon the offerings of the Church “with a serene and kindly countenance, and to accept them, as once [He was] pleased to accept the gifts of [His] servant Abel the just.”

For many Catholics, this mention of Abel and the gifts he offered is a somewhat obscure reference. Today, therefore, is a fine opportunity to draw out the significance of Abel, allowing him to stand in the light of the Scriptures and the sacred liturgy.

BEL WAS the younger brother of Cain, and both brothers were sons of Adam and Eve. Ultimately, in a fit of jealously, Cain killed Abel—the first, but not nearly the last, example of murder in the Bible. The cause of this fratricide is explained in the Book of Genesis, chapter 4: “In the course of time Cain brought to the LORD an offering of the fruit of the ground, and Abel brought of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat portions. And the LORD had regard for Abel and his offering, but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell” (Gen 4:3-5, RSV). This is why Cain killed Abel.

The story does not explicitly say why Abel’s offering found acceptance before the Lord, nor does it explicitly say why Cain’s offering did not. Nevertheless, two reasons suggest themselves and find support in the New Testament.

Mosaic in Monreale Cathedral, Sicily

First, there is the external matter of what was physically offered. Abel was a herdsman, and he offered the firstlings of his flock—that is to say, the best he had to offer. Cain was a tiller of the ground, but for his offering, he failed to choose the first fruits of his produce. Cain offered not what was best, but simply what he had at hand. Sacrifice is always better, more pure, more complete when we offer the best of ourselves.

A second reason why Abel’s sacrifice was more excellent than Cain’s concerns the interior matter of the disposition with which these offerings were made. Again, Genesis does not speak directly to this, but the Letter to the Hebrews does. There it says: “By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain, through which he received approval as righteous” (Heb 11:4, RSV). The superiority of Abel’s gift stems from the fact that it was offered with faith and in righteousness. Those are the interior dispositions of a just man—dispositions which Cain evidently did not have. If Cain had been faithful and righteous, he would not have been provoked to murder his brother, since, as the Gospels remind us, we are known by our fruits (Matt 7:16 and 20). Abel’s offering was made from the heart, whereas Cain’s was perfunctory.

All of this helps us to make sense of our liturgical references to Abel. What is prayed in the super oblata today is really no different from what is prayed in the Roman Canon. In both cases, we ask God to look upon our offering and to regard it with the same favor with which He once regarded Abel’s sacrifice of old.

E SHOULD ask ourselves to what extent the personal sacrifice we make at the altar resembles the sacrifice of Abel. Insofar as the sacrifice offered at the altar is the sacrifice of Christ, it is perfect and lacking in nothing, wholly and eternally pleasing to God the Father. Insofar as it is also our sacrifice, all this remains an open question. 1 This is clear from the words of the priest, when he enjoins the faithful: “Pray, brethren, that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God, the almighty Father.”

We make a pleasing and acceptable sacrifice to God 1) by offering what is truly best of ourselves and 2) by offering with faith and in righteousness—deeply, interiorly, with love and fervor and devotion.

Each time we approach the altar, may the Lord look upon our worship just as favorably as He looked upon the gifts of Abel the just!

Abel with Melchizedek, Abraham, and Isaac (Mosaic in Sant’Apollinare in Classe, Ravenna)


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   On this point, I am indebted to Milton Walsh, In Memory of Me: A Meditation on the Roman Canon (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011), 129.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Extraordinary Form 1962 Missal, History of the Roman Canon, prayer Last Updated: July 19, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 14 September 2025) discusses OFFERTORY ANTIPHONS and contains a wonderful quote by Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Draft Copy (Pamphlet)
    A few days ago, I posted a draft copy of this 12-page pamphlet with citations about the laity’s “full, conscious, and active participation.” Its basic point or message is that choir directors should never feel embarrassed to teach real choral music because Vatican II explicitly ordered them to do that! We’ve received tons of mail regarding that pamphlet, with many excellent suggestions for improvement. Please feel free to chime in!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Entrance Chant” • 23rd (Ordinary Time)
    This coming Sunday, 7 September 2025, is the 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). You can download the “Entrance Chant,” conveniently located at the feasts website. I also recorded a rehearsal video for it (freely available at the same website). The Communion Chant includes gorgeous verses in FAUXBOURDON. I attempted to create a rehearsal video for it, and it’s been posted at the feasts website, called by some: “church music’s best kept secret.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The sacrificial death of Jesus Christ the High Priest on Calvary is and will remain the basis for the active participation of the faithful in the liturgy. Membership in the Church, which is brought about by valid baptism, makes one a part of the Mystical Body of Christ, THE PRIEST, to whose priesthood one is interiorly conformed through the baptismal character.”

— “Divini Cultus Studium” (Dr. Robert A. Skeris, 1990)

Recent Posts

  • Do You Recognize This Hymn? Do You Like It?
  • Charlie Kirk’s Fascination with Traditional Catholic Liturgy
  • “Novus Ordo Parish … With Polyphony?” • Is that possible? How specifically does that work?
  • “The Injustice of Traditionis Custodes” • (Private Meetings at the Vatican)
  • New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.