• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Gifts of Abel the Just

Fr. David Friel · July 19, 2020

N UNCOMMON link unites today’s celebration of the Ordinary and Extraordinary Forms of the Roman Rite. On most Sundays, there is not a direct correspondence between the orations (i.e., the collect, super oblata, and post-communion) used in the two forms of the Roman Rite. Today, however, exactly the same prayer is used both as the secret for the 7th Sunday after Pentecost (EF) and the prayer over the offerings for the 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time (OF). Not only is this correspondence out of the ordinary, but the text of the prayer, itself, is rather unusual.

The Sacrifice of Cain and Abel, by Mariotto Albertinelli

Here is the text, along with the present English translation (ICEL, 2010):

Deus, qui legalium differentiam hostiarum
unius sacrificii perfectione sanxisti,
accipe sacrificium a devotis tibi famulis,
et pari benedictione, sicut munera Abel, sanctifica,
ut, quod singuli obtulerunt ad maiestatis tuae honorem,
cunctis proficiat ad salutem.

O God, who in the one perfect sacrifice
brought to completion varied offerings of the law,
accept, we pray, this sacrifice from your faithful servants
and make it holy, as you blessed the gifts of Abel,
so that what each has offered to the honor of your majesty
may benefit the salvation of all.

Particularly unusual for a super oblata is the mention of the Old Testament character Abel and the gifts he offered. A very similar allusion finds expression in the Roman Canon, which asks God to look upon the offerings of the Church “with a serene and kindly countenance, and to accept them, as once [He was] pleased to accept the gifts of [His] servant Abel the just.”

For many Catholics, this mention of Abel and the gifts he offered is a somewhat obscure reference. Today, therefore, is a fine opportunity to draw out the significance of Abel, allowing him to stand in the light of the Scriptures and the sacred liturgy.

BEL WAS the younger brother of Cain, and both brothers were sons of Adam and Eve. Ultimately, in a fit of jealously, Cain killed Abel—the first, but not nearly the last, example of murder in the Bible. The cause of this fratricide is explained in the Book of Genesis, chapter 4: “In the course of time Cain brought to the LORD an offering of the fruit of the ground, and Abel brought of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat portions. And the LORD had regard for Abel and his offering, but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell” (Gen 4:3-5, RSV). This is why Cain killed Abel.

The story does not explicitly say why Abel’s offering found acceptance before the Lord, nor does it explicitly say why Cain’s offering did not. Nevertheless, two reasons suggest themselves and find support in the New Testament.

Mosaic in Monreale Cathedral, Sicily

First, there is the external matter of what was physically offered. Abel was a herdsman, and he offered the firstlings of his flock—that is to say, the best he had to offer. Cain was a tiller of the ground, but for his offering, he failed to choose the first fruits of his produce. Cain offered not what was best, but simply what he had at hand. Sacrifice is always better, more pure, more complete when we offer the best of ourselves.

A second reason why Abel’s sacrifice was more excellent than Cain’s concerns the interior matter of the disposition with which these offerings were made. Again, Genesis does not speak directly to this, but the Letter to the Hebrews does. There it says: “By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain, through which he received approval as righteous” (Heb 11:4, RSV). The superiority of Abel’s gift stems from the fact that it was offered with faith and in righteousness. Those are the interior dispositions of a just man—dispositions which Cain evidently did not have. If Cain had been faithful and righteous, he would not have been provoked to murder his brother, since, as the Gospels remind us, we are known by our fruits (Matt 7:16 and 20). Abel’s offering was made from the heart, whereas Cain’s was perfunctory.

All of this helps us to make sense of our liturgical references to Abel. What is prayed in the super oblata today is really no different from what is prayed in the Roman Canon. In both cases, we ask God to look upon our offering and to regard it with the same favor with which He once regarded Abel’s sacrifice of old.

E SHOULD ask ourselves to what extent the personal sacrifice we make at the altar resembles the sacrifice of Abel. Insofar as the sacrifice offered at the altar is the sacrifice of Christ, it is perfect and lacking in nothing, wholly and eternally pleasing to God the Father. Insofar as it is also our sacrifice, all this remains an open question. 1 This is clear from the words of the priest, when he enjoins the faithful: “Pray, brethren, that my sacrifice and yours may be acceptable to God, the almighty Father.”

We make a pleasing and acceptable sacrifice to God 1) by offering what is truly best of ourselves and 2) by offering with faith and in righteousness—deeply, interiorly, with love and fervor and devotion.

Each time we approach the altar, may the Lord look upon our worship just as favorably as He looked upon the gifts of Abel the just!

Abel with Melchizedek, Abraham, and Isaac (Mosaic in Sant’Apollinare in Classe, Ravenna)


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   On this point, I am indebted to Milton Walsh, In Memory of Me: A Meditation on the Roman Canon (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011), 129.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Extraordinary Form 1962 Missal, History of the Roman Canon, prayer Last Updated: July 19, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Come now,” they said, “Thou who wouldst destroy the temple and build it up in three days, rescue Thyself; come down from that cross, if Thou art the Son of God.”

— Gospel of St. Matthew 27:42

Recent Posts

  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.