• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • About
  • Symposium
  • Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Two remarkable (radical) liturgical realities … which few realize!

Jeff Ostrowski · July 5, 2020

HE INTERNET is replete with theories about the 1960s reform of the liturgy. The documents of Vatican II have been posted in translation, excellent commentaries (e.g. by Fr. Robert Skeris) have been posted online, and those who were involved in the actual work of reform—such as Ferdinando Cardinal Antonelli (d. 1993) and Father Louis Bouyer (d. 2004)—have revealed how slapdash and hurried many of the decisions were.

But two liturgical realities are frequently overlooked:

(1) the Psalter created in the 1940s under Pope Pius XII;

(2) the Urbanite revision of the hymns in 1631AD.

The new Psalter by Pius XII (which soon died out) would have massively changed every liturgical book in existence, and would have required at least 10-20 years to implement. (We have scanned a 2,000 page book by Solesmes Abbey which uses the Pius XII Psalter, and you will be hearing more about this later.)

(1) Pope Pius XII Psalter

It is remarkable to observe how infrequently liturgical blogs and journals speak of the 1940s version of the Psalter, which was supposedly created directly from Hebrew MSS. The prime mover for this Psalter was Augustin Cardinal Bea (d. 1968), the personal confessor of Pope Pius XII. This was a massive change, because—in a very real sense—the Psalter is the liturgy itself! It is a matter of debate whether the Versio Piana was ever imposed upon the Church; some insist it was, while others say it was optional. In any event, I personally know priests who were forced to use it—but it was abandoned after a few years. (Father Michael Irwin told me he couldn’t understand it!) We have scanned a remarkable book, published by the Abbey of Solesmes in the 1950s, which uses the Psalter of Pius XII, and in the coming months we will have much to say about this book.

Without question, this gargantuan modification to the ancient liturgy by Ven. Pope Pius XII helped “pave the way” for further reform during Vatican II Council.

(2) Urbanite Corruption of the Hymns

Father Adrian Fortescue explained 1 the whole matter very well, perhaps better than anyone. While Pope Urban VIII left a few hymns intact, many were utterly destroyed: even the meter was changed! In some hymns, the Urbanite reform left less than 5% of the original poetry. A new publication, the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (2018), carefully explores and explains the actions of Pope Urban VIII, providing hundreds of examples. (In particular, the color-page section is fabulous in its treatment of the Urbanite reform.) Dr. Aaron James, who has a double doctorate, recently the following vis-à-vis the Brébeuf hymnal:

Anyone who has engaged seriously with the texts of the ancient Office hymns knows the great confusion that can be generated by multiple versions of the same texts (particularly as a result of Urban VIII’s 1631 reform of the breviary, which rewrote the hymns to match the Latin prosody of pre-Christian antiquity). The editors navigate this difficult terrain with assurance; indeed, the editors’ explanation of the Urbanite reform and its impact on English translators is a model of clarity, and contains information this reviewer has not encountered elsewhere.

The Brébeuf hymnal had access to some of the world’s greatest experts in Latin, and the book provides many literal translations of ancient Catholic hymns which can’t be found anywhere else. Here’s an example of the Pre-Urbanite Ad Cenam Agni Providi hymn:

The book I mentioned earlier—the one published by Solesmes Abbey in the 1950s using the Pius XII Psalter—also had scholars create literal translations of the hymns. Here’s an example of the Urbanite Ad Cenam Agni Providi hymn (which changed the title to “Ad Regias Agni Dapes”):

I think we can agree that the Brébeuf hymnal literal translations are excellent, while the Solesmes Abbey version isn’t too shabby either!



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Father Fortescue writes: “In the seventeenth century came the crushing blow which destroyed the beauty of all breviary hymns. […] Attempts to reform them had been made before, but so far they had been spared. Pope Urban VIII (d. 1644) was destined to succeed in destroying them. He appointed four Jesuits to reform the hymns, so that they should no longer offend Renaissance ears. […] These four Jesuits, in that faithful obedience to the Holy See which is the glory of their society, with a patient care that one cannot help admiring, set to work to destroy every hymn in the office. They had no concept of the fact that many of these hymns were written in meter by accent; their lack of understanding those venerable types of Christian poetry is astounding. They could conceive no ideal but that of a school grammar of Augustan Latin. Wherever a line was not as Horace would have written it, it had to go. The period was hopelessly bad for any poetry; these pious Jesuits were true children of their time. So they embarked on that fatal reform whose effect was the ruin of our hymns. They slashed and tinkered, they re-wrote lines and altered words, they changed the sense and finally produced the poor imitations that we still have, in the place of the hymns our fathers sang for over a thousand years. Indeed their confidence in themselves is amazing. They were not ashamed to lay their hands on Sedulius, on Prudentius, on St. Ambrose himself. […] No one who knows anything about the subject now doubts that that revision of Urban VIII was a ghastly mistake, for which there is not one single word of any kind to be said. Now all the points which shocked him, as not being classical, are known and established as perfectly legitimate examples of recognized laws. It was as foolish a mistake to judge poetry of the fourth and following centuries by the rules of the Augustan age, as it would be to try to tinker prose written in one language, to make it conform with the grammar of another. There are cases where these seventeenth-century Jesuits did not even know the rules of their own grammar books.”

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Insane Pacelli Liturgical Practice, Jean de Brebeuf Hymnal, Pope Urban VIII, Urbanite Hymn Reform Last Updated: September 8, 2021

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

Alabama Assessment!

We received this evaluation of Symposium 2022 from an Alabama participant:

“Oh, how the Symposium echoed the words of Cardinal Merry Del Val: …choosing only what is most conformed to Thy glory, which is my final aim. In one short and fast paced week, the faculty and attendees showed me the hand of God and our Lady working in our lives. The wide range of education—from Gregorian Chant, jazz modes in organ improvisation, to ‘staying sane’ while leading a choir—were certainly first-class knowledge from the best teachers of the art. However, the most powerful lesson was learning how to pray as a choir. The sacrifice of putting songs together, taking time to learn the sacred text, meditating on the church teaching through the chants, and gaining the virtues required to persevere in these duties were not only qualities of a choir but of a saint. The sanctification of the lives of the attendees was a beautiful outcome of this event … and that in itself is worth more than a beautifully-sung Solesmes style chant!”

—Jeff Ostrowski
PDF Download • Trinity Sunday (22 pages)

Feel free to download this Organ Accompaniment Booklet for Trinity Sunday (Second Vespers). Notice how the modes progress by number. Psalm 1 is mode 1; Psalm 2 is mode 2; Psalm 3 is mode 3; Psalm 4 is mode 4; Psalm 5 is mode 5. I am told by an expert that other feasts (such as Corpus Christi) are likewise organized by mode, and it’s called a “numerical office.”

—Jeff Ostrowski
10 June 2022 • “Official” rhythm of plainsong

I continue to search for the most beautiful way to present the “pure” Editio Vaticana scores. (Technically, the “pure” rhythm of the official edition is what everyone is supposed to use.) You can download my latest attempt, which is the Introit for this coming Sunday: Feast of the Most Holy Trinity. Because this is not an ancient feast, the Introit had to be adapted (perhaps around 750AD). Prior Johner says the adaptation is “not an entirely happy one.”

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

The liturgical reform bears absolutely no relation to what is called “desacralization” and in no way intends to lend support to the phenomenon of “secularizing the world.” Accordingly the rites must retain their dignity, spirit of reverence, and sacred character.

— Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship (5 September 1970)

Recent Posts

  • “I Decided to Get a Plane Ticket and Fly 8,700 Miles From Singapore to Take Part.”
  • Alabama Assessment!
  • “How Has Nobody Done This Before?” • Vol. 1
  • “Exceeded Every Expectation!” • Mr. O’Brien’s Review
  • “81 Photos” • Sacred Music Symposium 2022

Copyright © 2022 Corpus Christi Watershed · Gabriel Lalemant on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.