• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • About
  • Symposium
  • Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

What Palestrina Did With Kyrie II (“Fons Bonitatis”)

Jeff Ostrowski · January 15, 2020

AGNIFICENT! There is no other word for it. I am speaking of the Palestrina’s Kyrie based on the Gregorian Kyrie II (“Fons Bonitatis”), which is divided—as you might guess—into three marvelous sections. You can listen all three sections by visiting Lalemant Polyphonic and scrolling to 81668. I strongly encourage you to do this!  And just where does “Kyrie Fons Bonitatis” come from?  We remember that prior to the Council of Trent, the prayers at Mass were “troped.” Many erroneously believe the Kyrie was the only thing troped, but that’s not even close to true. The Gloria, Sanctus, Agnus Dei—and even the readings!—were troped.

Here’s a rehearsal video we made for Part 1 of 3. (I again humbly request that you go listen to the other sections, as well.)


Kyrie II (“Fons Bonitatis”) has remained remarkably stable. Look how it appeared in Cantus Varii, a marvelous collection by Solesmes printed in 1928:

— PDF Download • Kyrie II (1928)

A 2011 publication from Germany seemingly copied this 1928 edition without any changes, although it inserted “tropeless” Editio Vaticana repetitions which puzzle me:

— PDF Download • Kyrie II (Germany, 2011)

A 2016 publication with variations from the Sarum Use also seemingly copied the 1928 version verbatim, with a few very minor changes (e.g. Pneumáte instead of Pnéumatis):

— PDF Download • Kyrie II (Sarum Use)

In the most wonderful way, Palestrina derives his polyphonic lines from the complicated chant melodies of Kyrie II.  For example:

HENEVER POSSIBLE, we must locate the version (“variant”) of the plainsong which Palestrina was looking at when he wrote his Mass. But which version was it? This question is sometimes impossible to answer because we know so little about the lives of the Renaissance composers. However, as I mentioned earlier, Kyrie II is relatively “stable” compared to other chants, so we can be fairly certain the version Palestrina had before him is similar to what we have in the Editio Vaticana.

Consider this version from the 14th century:

 

Here’s one from the late 15th century:

80360-Palestrina-Kyrie-Fons-Bonitatis-late-15th-century

 

Another version from the 15th century:

 

A version from 1525AD:

 

Here is a version from 1580AD:

 

A version from 1591AD:

 

Here is a version from the 16th century:

 

Another from the 16th century:

 

Here’s the version Dr. Peter Wagner chose in his 1903 Kyriale:

80359-Peter-Wagner-Gregorian-Kyrie-ii-edit

 

And here’s the version Mocquereau chose for his 1903 Liber Usualis. Notice the spots where it differs from Pothier’s Editio Vaticana:

80358-1904-Mocquereau-LIBER-USUALIS

Here is the 1863 edition by Father Hermesdorff, the teacher of Peter Wagner (considered a “corrupt” edition of plainsong):

 

 

Here is another “corrupt” version of Kyrie II printed in 1857:

 

The particular way Palestrina places the chant melodies from Kyrie II into his version is stunning. I was going to say Part 3 was my favorite, but Part 2 is also magnificent—and so is Part 1. So it’s all my favorite! The rehearsal videos we made simply don’t do justice to this masterpiece.

In grad school I remember thinking Palestrina wasn’t as interesting as certain other composers; but I was dead wrong.

 

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Cantus Selecti, Cantus Varii, Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina, Medieval Manuscripts Last Updated: May 6, 2021

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

16 May 2022 • Harmonized Chant?

This year’s upcoming Sacred Music Symposium will demonstrate several ways to sing the CREDO at Mass. This is because—for many parishes—to sing a full-length polyphonic CREDO by Victoria or Palestrina is out of the question. Therefore, we show options that are halfway between plainsong and polyphony. You can hear my choir rehearsing a section that sounds like harmonized plainsong.

—Jeff Ostrowski
14 May 2022 • “Pure” Vatican Edition

As readers know, my choir has been singing from the “pure” Editio Vaticana. That is to say, the official rhythm which—technically—is the only rhythm allowed by the Church. I haven’t figured out how I want the scores to look, so in the meantime we’ve been using temporary scores that look like this. Stay tuned!

—Jeff Ostrowski
14 May 2022 • Gorgeous Book

If there is a more beautiful book than Abbat Pothier’s 1888 Processionale Monasticum, I don’t know what it might be. This gorgeous tome was today added to the Saint John Lalande Online Library. I wish I owned a physical copy.

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“To treat harmony and rhythm in this matter was a difficult matter. Facing numerous problems both large and small—that arose constantly—we understood that a flawless harmonization of Gregorian chant cannot be created by improvisation, no matter the competence and ability of the organist or harmonist.”

— ‘Mons. Jules Van Nuffel, NOH Preface’

Recent Posts

  • “Gregorian Chant Not In Danger Pope Tells French”
  • PDF Download • “O Salutaris” (Modern Setting)
  • Summer Ward Method Courses • CUA 2022
  • PDF Download • 2022 “Vespers Booklet” (99 Pages)
  • “Playing the Pipe Organ” • By Richard Nixon

Copyright © 2022 Corpus Christi Watershed · Gabriel Lalemant on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.