• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Musicians in Collaborative Parishes • Sharing Best Practices

Richard J. Clark · November 23, 2018

RJC_StCeciliaAngel Saint Cecilia and An Angel • Orazio Gentileschi & Giovanni Lanfranco HERE IS NO shortage of challenge in pastoral ministry. This is an understatement of a lifetime! Then why do we do it? Perhaps because parish work, despite its potential obstacles, is among the most rewarding.

Among such challenges faced in the Archdiocese of Boston (and well beyond) are a shortage of priests, shifting demographics, decline in attendance, and the subsequent reorganization of parish governance. Boston, like many other dioceses, has faced painful parish closings. Now Boston is several years into the formation of “collaboratives” in the Disciples in Mission program.

As a result, many priests, parish staffs, and musicians are doing their jobs in ways they have never had to do before. And there is no simple precedent or roadmap. Such uncharted territory heightens our calling to serve.

• The Archdiocese of Boston’s Secretariat for Evangelization and Discipleship is offering several evening sessions on Forming Collaboratives for Mission. Download dates and locations here.

N EVENT FOR MUSICIANS on this paramount topic of collaboratives was recently held at St. Catherine Parish in Westford. Sponsored by the Boston Chapter of The National Association of Pastoral Musicians, it was presented by Kelly Clark (no relation), Director of Music of the St. Anne – St. Catherine Collaborative. Her presentation focused on sharing “Best Practices” with an understanding that it is a process to discover what works best (and what doesn’t work). Ultimately, she offered a valuable list of considerations that have universal value and can be applied to most any pastoral ministry.

To start—What is a collaborative? According to Disciples in Mission it is:

two or three parishes who share:

• A Pastor
• A Pastoral Team
• A Collaborative Pastoral Council
• A Local Pastoral Plan – approved 2016

But, who maintain their own:

• identity
• assets and obligations
• buildings (including churches)
• Parish Finance Council

THAT’S A RATHER BROAD description, and of course each parish (and collaborative) is highly unique, each with distinct gifts and challenges. Therefore, there is no one-size-fits-all plan for success.

However, I will highlight the discussion points Kelly Clark brought forth. Born from critical experience of guiding two communities together (after leading one of them for many years), she can speak to many necessary adjustments that came along the way. Her discussion points are worthy of ongoing reflection!

In doing so she was very honest about learning from mistakes, making adjustments appropriate for their collaborative, and addressing problems as they arose. (See No. 10.) I also share my own thoughts and reflections on each topic. (Each is worthy of its own article!) Of course you will have your own. I invite you to e-mail me if you wish to share your thoughts of what succeeds and how to avoid pitfalls.


SHARING BEST PRACTICES

1. PLANNING FOR WHAT WORKS • Bringing multiple communities together who have disparate histories and backgrounds may take years to achieve. Planning for “what works” will take time—trial and error. One might begin with pragmatic elements, such as convenient rehearsal times, exploring shared repertoire, distributing and utilizing musicians, singers, and resources more effectively, if not always perfectly evenly. Burnout for the Director is inevitable if planning and administration is not streamlined to some degree!

2. FLEXIBILITY • This is a skill all musicians must have to succeed and survive. The Catholic Church is no exception. There is a demand for a diversity of not only musical skills, but also flexibility in personal skills.

3. AVOIDING OWNERSHIP • This is a tough one. Kelly Clark admits this also applies to the music director(s). (again See #10) Parishioners who have volunteered for years (if not decades) often have a healthy ownership. But when communities shift, letting go of some ownership is a necessity for growth. The same goes for Music Directors who may have spent years (if not decades) developing a program that now must face change or adaptaion.

4. ADDRESSING CHALLENGING SITUATIONS/BEHAVIORS • Whenever there is change, people are in great emotional pain. Give them leeway and don’t judge. A closed parish or a parish that enters in to a collaborative with a new pastor can feel as painful as a death in the family. Hopefully, this will lead to new growth and opportunity, but this will take time.

However, problems may persist that need attention. (Problems may arise with No. 3.) Also it is easy for one parish to feel slighted or neglected if there is a larger and perhaps more dominant parish in a collaborative. This can lead to mounting tensions.

Such tensions can only be resolved by strong leadership from the pastor. A music director may have to be the one to address a problem, but can only do so with the trust and full backing of the pastor. Without it, a music director’s authority is compromised which can lead to additional difficulties. Likewise, addressing problems should only occur after a personal meeting and a thoughtful and respectful discussion with the pastor.

In all of this, a music director must draw upon pastoral and personal skills they perhaps never needed before. One will need to learn as much about human nature as music!

5. RUNNING EFFICIENT REHEARSALS • Respect people’s time! They will love you for it and keep coming back! Be prepared musically and administratively for each rehearsal. Have a rehearsal plan that budgets time for each piece. This is helpful even if there is necessary deviation. (I’m writing this to remind myself…)

6. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS • “All politics is local.” No truer words! Key to leadership is the development of respectful and appropriate relationships. All effective leadership depends largely on the emotional wellbeing and motivation of those under our direction. And truly, why do we do what we do if not to be in service to our communities?

7. MENTORSHIP (especially youth) • All we do is with an eye towards development—for the present and for the future. Never underestimate the intelligence of our children, i.e., never “dumb it down.” As a father of four, I can assure you, they are absorbing our examples (good or otherwise) whether they appear to be paying attention or not.

8. PRAYER AND FELLOWSHIP • There are few bonds stronger than those we make music with. And those we pray with—in song? Such bonds might never broken.

9. CONTINUED FORMATION • Always plan, direct, and teach with an eye towards development—personal, spiritual, and musical.

10. HUMOR AND HUMILITY • Life is too short to get bent out of shape about a great many things. That is not to mean we don’t care about the integrity of the sacred liturgy. But a bit of humor and levity offer can offer much needed perspective at the right moments. It is so important to have fun, be joyful and grateful for your fellow musicians and parishioners. For without them, we accomplish nothing.

INALLY, IT IS IMPORTANT to recognize how vital the Pastor’s leadership is for a collaborative to succeed, no less to keep his own health. The job of any pastor is one of the hardest and most stressful anywhere. They must be all things to all people. They receive training in theology, etc., and then must know how to manage ancient crumbling edifices and juggle disparate personalities on staff.

A pastor must develop and hire staff he can trust. (This may be a process of years to hire the right staff.) They may need to macro-manage more than they might like. They need a strong emotional support from their own friends and family. Pray for your pastors! We should be concerned about them and especially those responsible for multiple parishes.

We have an obligation to create an environment for our music ministers of prayer, joy, and gratitude, while striving for excellence with the resources at our disposal. In doing so, know that you will affect people and change their lives for the better—usually without ever knowing it. Know this and believe it.

THIS CONVERSATION IS ONLY A BEGINNING. There will be struggles—plenty—and perhaps there is no light at the end of the tunnel. But these struggles are the crucible through which we learn to serve God and each other better.

Soli Deo gloria

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

Oh, what sighs I uttered, what tears I shed, to mingle with the waters of the torrent, while I chanted to Thee, O my God, the psalms of Holy Church in the Office of the Dead!

— ‘Isaac Jogues, upon finding Goupil’s corpse (1642)’

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up