• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Jesus said to them: “I have come into this world so that a sentence may fall upon it, that those who are blind should see, and those who see should become blind. If you were blind, you would not be guilty. It is because you protest, ‘We can see clearly,’ that you cannot be rid of your guilt.”

  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Fulton J. Sheen • World’s Most Progressive Bishop?

Jeff Ostrowski · May 4, 2017

620 DRAFTS EARS AGO, I knew a seminarian named Mario Portella, who was later ordained a priest and now resides in Florence. In the 1990s, he gave me a VHS cassette—the current generation won’t know what that is—containing a video produced in 1941. The film location was Our Lady of Sorrows, on the west side of Chicago. You’ll notice this film was helpful in assembling drafts for the Campion Hymnal when you click on the upper right image.

The narrator was MONSIGNOR FULTON J. SHEEN, who would be consecrated a bishop ten years later. (He was already a huge radio star by 1941.) If you think about it, this was quite a progressive thing to do. 1

Consider what America was like in 1941. The Second World War was raging, and America would soon begin fighting. Moreover, very few people had television in those days! Only after WW2 did television become popular in America. For whom was this film intended? Was it played in theaters? I doubt that; yet the production is masterful. 2

In the following excerpt, notice how the commentary fits perfectly, multiple camera angles are used, the ceremonies are done with precision, and they even include “text” shots:


The ancient Mass was discovered by a new generation in the 1990s, and has taken off in a way nobody expected. That’s why I included some film from 2017 toward the end of that excerpt.

197 Fulton J Sheen Fulton J. Sheen might also be considered “progressive” in that he took political stances. His entire life, he fought communism. The following excerpt by Sheen is interesting, because which of us can waltz into the President’s office?

HE SUBJECT OF COMMUNISM became intense during the Spanish Civil War in 1936. One incident of that period is worth recalling. The foreign policy of the United States was considering lifting the embargo against sending arms to the Communists in Spain. In order to combat this movement, a meeting was held in Constitution Hall, Washington. The speakers were three: a former Spanish ambassador, a young woman who had been in Spain and had fought against the Communists, and myself. Thousands were turned away from Constitution Hall. It is very likely that this meeting had something to do with the breaking down of the movement to send arms to the Communists.

The day after that meeting in Constitution Hall, I had a meeting with President Roosevelt. Its purpose really was to ask for an assignment to the Housing Committee for a friend of mine who was defeated for a second term in Congress. I was always opposed to asking any favor from a politician, but because this man had been a good friend of mine for years, I broke my resolution.

When I went in to see President Roosevelt he was angry. I thought he was angry with the Secretary of War, who had just left the office. I soon learned that he was angry with me. He had the Washington Post laid upright before him on the desk. When I came in, he began: “There is one thing that I will not tolerate in this country, and that is giving speeches such as you gave last night in Constitution Hall.” I asked: “What was said, Mr. President, that offended you?” He read a line from the paper. I knew no such statement had been made. I then asked: “Mr. President, let me see the paper.” Recognizing that he was not quoting from the speeches at Constitution Hall, but from another meeting in Washington, he quickly rumpled up the paper and threw it into the wastebasket: “You must take my word when I say anything.” “I can take your word,” I assured him, “unless it is not true.”

President Roosevelt said: “You think you know a great deal about the Church’s attitude toward communism, don’t you? I want to tell you that I am in touch with a great authority who tells me the Church wants the Communists to win in Spain.” I said: “Mr. President, I am not the least bit impressed with your authority.” He said: “I did not tell you who it was.” I said: “You are referring to Cardinal Mundelein, and I know that Cardinal Mundelein never made the statement that you have attributed to him.”

He then changed the subject, and began attacking the Archbishop of Baltimore. He said: “Imagine, that man who is seated on the chair that was once occupied by a cousin of mine called the Ambassador from Spain to the United States a ‘liar.’ I will have no dealings with any man who cannot contain himself and uses words of this kind to destroy public servants.” And he went on: “Another thing, one of my bodyguards went over to St. Augustine’s Church last Sunday. He said that the priest asked parishioners to join a protest against Roosevelt, who is in favor of sending arms to the Communists in Spain.” The President then shouted: “That man is a liar.” Recognizing that he was using the word he had condemned in the mouth of Archbishop Curley, he laughingly said: “You know how it is, we men in public life become a little excited now and then.”

Seeing that we were getting nowhere, I said: “Mr. President, I came to see you about a position in Housing.” He said: “Oh, Eddie voted for everything I wanted in Congress. He wants to be in Housing, does he not?” “Yes.” So he wrote on a pad his name and said: “The moment you leave this office I will call Mrs. So-and-So [he mentioned the name of a woman who was in charge of Housing] and you call Eddie and tell him he has the job.”

When I left the White House I called Eddie and said: “Eddie, I saw the President. I am sorry, you do not get the job.” He said: “Is that what the President said after all I did for him?” I said: “No, he said you would have it.” My friend never received the job.

That story is from Sheen’s marvelous autobiography, Treasure in Clay, which you should purchase immediately if you don’t own it. As always, please buy through Amazon Smile so CCWatershed will get a portion of the proceeds. Thank you!

 


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   When I use that word, I am not speaking about the mealy-mouthed “progressive” Catholics who reject the holy doctrines of our Church yet never plainly admit it—and think themselves very clever. The less said about such people, the better.

2   According to Chicago Tribune, this 1941 film (whose official title is The Eternal Gift) played for two days at the Chicago Civic Opera House from 31 March 1941 through 1 April 1941. The entire video can be viewed on YouTube.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Bishop Fulton J Sheen Last Updated: May 12, 2021

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Music List” • 5th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 5th Sunday of Easter (18 May 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. The Communion Antiphon was ‘restored’ the 1970 Missale Romanum (a.k.a. MISSALE RECENS) from an obscure martyr’s feast. Our choir is on break this Sunday, so the selections are relatively simple in nature.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion Chant (5th Sunday of Easter)
    This coming Sunday—18 May 2025—is the 5th Sunday of Easter, Year C (MISSALE RECENS). The COMMUNION ANTIPHON “Ego Sum Vitis Vera” assigned by the Church is rather interesting, because it comes from a rare martyr’s feast: viz. Saint Vitalis of Milan. It was never part of the EDITIO VATICANA, which is the still the Church’s official edition. As a result, the musical notation had to be printed in the Ordo Cantus Missae, which appeared in 1970.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 4th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 4th Sunday of Easter (11 May 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. I don’t know a more gorgeous ENTRANCE CHANT than the one given there: Misericórdia Dómini Plena Est Terra.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    When to Sit, Stand and Kneel like it’s 1962
    There are lots of different guides to postures for Mass, but I couldn’t find one which matched our local Latin Mass, so I made this one: sit-stand-kneel-crop
    —Veronica Brandt
    The Funeral Rites of the Graduale Romanum
    Lately I have been paging through the 1974 Graduale Romanum (see p. 678 ff.) and have been fascinated by the funeral rites found therein, especially the simply-beautiful Psalmody that is appointed for all the different occasions before and after the funeral Mass: at the vigil/wake, at the house of the deceased, processing to the church, at the church, processing to the cemetery, and at the cemetery. Would that this “stational Psalmody” of the Novus Ordo funeral rites saw wider usage! If you or anyone you know have ever used it, please do let me know.
    —Daniel Tucker

Random Quote

“The Chasuble, or upper garment, represents the purple garment which the soldiers put upon Jesus Christ, and the heavy cross that He carried on His blessed shoulders to Mount Calvary.”

— Guide for the Laity (1875)

Recent Posts

  • A Gentleman (Whom I Don’t Know) Approached Me After Mass Yesterday And Said…
  • “For me, Gregorian chant at the Mass was much more consonant with what the Mass truly is…” —Bp. Earl Fernandes
  • “Lindisfarne Gospels” • Created circa 705 A.D.
  • “Music List” • 5th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
  • Communion Chant (5th Sunday of Easter)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.