• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Three Years Later

Fr. David Friel · November 30, 2014

HE SEASON OF ADVENT arrives today, bringing with it a whole new “Year of Grace.” Perhaps we should use this phrase, “Year of Grace,” more frequently, as I think it is fuller & richer than simply speaking about the start of a new “liturgical year.” It’s not that there is anything wrong with the idea of the liturgical year and its various cycles; it’s just that “Year of Grace” sounds so less calendar-based.

At any rate, today we call to mind the words of Isaiah, the great Advent prophet: “Oh, that You would rend the heavens and come down!” This is a sentiment that so many people in history have shared: the people of Israel, your ancestors, my ancestors, probably even the cavemen. They have all cried out to God, saying, “Oh, Lord, if you would just come down here!” It’s a human desire that is universal to every time & place: the desire to have God come down and be close to us.

The extraordinary thing for us, as Christians, is that God has done just that. He has “come down” here to Earth. That is the unbelievable reality we will celebrate on Christmas—what we might call Christ’s coming in history. But, it is important to remember that God’s coming down to Earth was not a once-and-done deal. The Lord comes to us in prayer, in the Sacraments, in the ordinary affairs of our daily lives, does He not? That is what we might call Christ’s coming in mystery. And, we believe, the Lord will come back to Earth at the end of time to judge the living and the dead. That is what we might call Christ’s coming in majesty. So, the fact that we weren’t alive at the time Jesus walked the Earth does not put us at a disadvantage. Christ came once in history, but He comes to us in mystery all the time, and He promises us that He is coming again in majesty.

It was three years ago today that the Roman Church in the Anglophone world began using the Roman Missal, Third Edition. To commemorate this occasion, I would like to reflect on how the three comings of Christ parallel three blessings I have experienced in the new Roman Missal.

IRST, this new translation has put us in touch with our history. There is no question that the words we now pray are more faithful to the Latin original than the texts of previous editions. Why is this important? Because these words & sentiments & images have been prayed by generations & generations of Catholics. These new prayers connect us with our great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparents in a new and deeper way. They also connect us with all our brothers & sisters throughout the world who pray the same words & sentiments & images—just in other languages.

ECOND, this new translation has put us in touch with mystery. Some of the new words and phrases might not have been immediately understood by all Catholics worshippers at first glance. But that is not a bad thing. If anything in the Mass causes us to ask a question or wonder about what we mean—can that possibly be a bad thing? It is not necessary, for example, to understand at the outset and in completeness every Scriptural allusion made by the ordinary & proper prayers. There is a role for personal & group study, so that these texts can be understood more deeply. Everything that may have seemed at first mysterious has really been nothing more than an invitation—an invitation to greater, deeper understanding.

HIRD this new translation has certainly put us in touch with God’s majesty. We have all heard in the proclamation of these texts how sacred the new language is. And that, too, is good. The language we use at Mass should not be ordinary or everyday, pedestrian or colloquial. Our private prayer can be in informal, everyday language. But, when we gather as a community to celebrate the sacred liturgy, our language, too, should be sacred. The language of this Missal is beautiful, and the world is in dire need of true beauty. The beauty of these new prayers is a definite reminder to us of God’s majesty.

I have made no secret of my support for this Missal. In an article for Homiletic & Pastoral Review (Roman Missal 3.0: Updates Installed) and in numerous blog posts (for example, HERE, HERE, & HERE), I have praised, defended, & explored this new Missal. It is not, of course, above critique; there are changes I would make. On the whole, however, it is such a vast improvement over the previous Sacramentary that my overwhelming response is one of gratitude.

I am grateful to those who labored to bring us this Missal, and I am grateful to the Holy Spirit, Who guided their work. May Christ continue to come to us through these sacred words!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Authentic Liturgical Renewal Reform, Beauty, Bishop Arthur J Serratelli Vox Clara, ICEL New Translation of the Roman Missal, Reform of the Reform, Roman Missal Third Edition Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Typo in the “Missale Romanum” (1962)
    The 1962 MISSALE ROMANUM was a transitional missal. It was on its way to becoming the 1970 version, but wasn’t there yet. It eliminated certain duplications, downplayed the Prayers at the Foot of the Altar, expanded the role of laymen, minimized the Last Gospel, made many items optional, and so forth. Father Valentine Young spotted many typos in the 1962 MISSALE ROMANUM, especially incorrect accents. The Offertory Antiphon for this coming Sunday (OF kalendar) contains an error, citing the wrong verse from Psalm 118. It should be 118:107b, not 118:154. If you read verse 154, you’ll understand how that error crept in. [In this particular case, the error pre-dates the 1962 Missal, since the 1940s hand-missal by Father Lasance also gets it wrong.]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 30th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 26 October 2025, which is the 30th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the top-notch feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Little Encouragement?
    In the Gospel, our Savior tells about 10 lepers who were healed. Only one went back to give thanks. Precious few express gratitude, yet many have endless energy to complain. For that reason, I deeply appreciate receiving messages like the following, which arrived a few days ago (about the parish where I direct in Michigan): “Last Sunday, a couple I knew from Grand Rapids was at Mass at 10:00 a.m. I got a chance to talk to them after Mass. I wanted to let you know what they said about the choir. They were absolutely floored by our sound!!!!! They both said they could continuously listen to our choir and the beauty of it. They asked me: “Do you always sound like that?” And they were also very surprised at how packed the church was. They said it was nice for them to be in such a full church. I just thought you would be interested to know their thoughts about our choir.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Since the English is not meant to be sung, but only to tell people who do not understand Latin what the text means, a simple paraphrase in prose is sufficient. The versions are not always very literal. Literal translations from Latin hymns would often look odd in English. I have tried to give in a readable, generally rhythmic form the real meaning of the text.”

— Fr. Adrian Fortescue (1913)

Recent Posts

  • A Practical Method of Projecting Solfege for Chant
  • PDF Downloads • Four (4) Simple Pieces in Harmony for Men’s Choirs
  • Typo in the “Missale Romanum” (1962)
  • “Music List” • 30th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • “Our Father” • Musical Setting?

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.