• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Unforgivable Sins

Jeff Ostrowski · September 29, 2014

823 Cardinal Ratzinger RECENTLY DISCOVERED some productions of mine from long ago. It wasn’t pretty. Seeing these early works caused depression and disappointment. At the time of creation, I thought they were wonderful—but now I’m horrified and embarrassed by them. Some might say, “Oh, people of an artistic bent are always hypercritical of their own works and dwell excessively upon their inadequacies.” While that may be true, it’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m talking awful. I asked myself:

“Why should I continue? I have so many faults and flaws. What possible contribution can I make?”

But I realized something important: Nobody’s perfect.

ONE OF THE MOST BRILLIANT men I know has serious character flaws. Not minor, not negligible: SERIOUS. (So serious that everyone acknowledges them.) Yet, this man is exceptionally gifted and inspiring. Or, consider Cardinal Ratzinger, who in 1972 published a theological proposal 1 manifestly ridiculous, even foolish! Yet, he turned out to be an outstanding, brave, and truly magnificent Pope. More importantly, he’s a saintly man. 2

What I’m talking about probably explains why some of the greatest pianists recorded so little. They were keenly aware of every flaw. Indeed, “live” recordings made without their knowledge often surpass their attempts in the studio. Josef Hofmann went to his grave unaware that his fans had secretly recorded some of his performances. Consider Hofmann’s recording of Chopin’s Fourth Ballade in 1938. Or, consider Glenn Gould’s 1959 “live” recording of Bach’s Goldberg Variations (even more wonderful than his 1955 studio version). Or, consider the Horowitz/Barbirolli 1941 “live” version of Rachmaninov’s Third Concerto. I could go on, but you get the point. Moreover, sometimes the “best” are not the best. I recently paid good money to obtain a special recording of Renaissance polyphony by the choir at Westminster Cathedral. On three separate occasions, I tried to listen to this CD, but ended up tossing it in the garbage. The balance was wrong, the boys’ tone overly harsh, and the musical phrasing lacked sensitivity. Are “sins” of my early productions, then, unforgivable? Perhaps not.

819 Ronald Knox IN THE END, EACH OF US must make a choice. We can do something, or we can refuse to do anything because we’re too critical. It’s easy to do nothing. It’s easy to sit back and list all the deficiencies in our efforts. Some people wait their entire lives to publish anything—because they can’t look past their faults—and die without having made any contribution. What will the Lord say to them? My parents tried to teach us what’s right. Perhaps they didn’t get everything just right. Perhaps they made errors—they’re not omniscient. But they tried.

In 1948, Msgr. Ronald Knox published a book called The Mass In Slow Motion. This was a collection of sermons he’d given to school girls, explaining the Mass. It’s pure gold:

      * *  PDF Download: Knox’s Mass In Slow Motion (once there, scroll down)

Knox has given us a good example, because he published something very personal for our spiritual benefit. He was probably tempted to ask, “What’s the use of publishing sermons I gave to school girls?” You won’t regret reading this phenomenal book. Here’s an excerpt:

I rather like a lot of Collects. It’s nice to have lots of different subjects of conversation when you are going to talk to God. When people ask us to say a prayer for some particular intention, our first reaction is perhaps to think it a nuisance. But surely we ought to regard each intention as a new excuse for claiming God’s attention, like a child who thinks it fun to be sent on a message to his father, because it’s so splendid to be allowed, for once, to interrupt him in his study. So with these obscurer saints, these much-thumbed imperatas; an excellent opportunity for making our conversation with God last longer.



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Zur Frage nach der Unauflöslichkeit der Ehe: Bemerkungen zum dogmengeschichtlichen Befund und zu seiner gegenwärtigen Bedeutung (1972).

2   By the way, his 2005 Stations of the Cross are excellent.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Monsignor Ronald Knox Traditional Mass Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Music List” • 19th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (10 August 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    This Sunday’s Communion Antiphon
    This coming Sunday—10 August 2025—is the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). The COMMUNION ANTIPHON is really gorgeous, and two of its features are worth mentioning. First of all, the Gospel reading assigned is from Saint Luke, whereas the the antiphon—although it matches the account—comes from Saint Matthew. (If anyone can point to a similar example, please notify me.) Furthermore, if you look at the authentic Gregorian Chant version posted on the feasts website, you’ll notice that it’s MODE III but ends on the ‘wrong’ note. A comparable instance of such a ‘transposed’ chant would be KYRIE IV.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Using “Ye” Vs. “You” Correctly
    Using “Ye” vs. “You” is rather tricky, because it depends upon which era one is trying to recreate—if that makes any sense. In other words, the rules haven’t always been the same for these two. Nevertheless, Father Philip George Caraman (the legendary Jesuit scholar) gives us a masterclass using Saint Luke’s Gospel. Father Caraman was close friends with Monsignor Ronald Knox, Evelyn Waugh, and Sir Alec Guinness.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The Catholic Church has a dignity far surpassing that of every merely human society, for it was founded by Christ the Lord. It is altogether fitting, therefore, that the language it uses should be noble, majestic, and non-vernacular.”

— Blessed John XXIII (22 February 1962)

Recent Posts

  • Is this what the new “Youth Mass” looks like?
  • “Music List” • 19th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • This Sunday’s Communion Antiphon
  • Using “Ye” Vs. “You” Correctly
  • Installment #3 • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.