• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Seeking the Face of God

Fr. David Friel · August 12, 2011

Early August every year brings us the feast of the Transfiguration of the Lord, which was celebrated last Saturday. In reflecting on that scene over the last week, I’ve been thinking of it as the fulfillment of a foundational Christian desire and natural longing of the human heart. From the time of Moses onward, Scripture stresses the theme of people searching for the face of God. We see it particularly in the psalms: “Let Your face shine on us” (Ps 67:2), “Hide not Your face from me” (Ps 27:9), “When shall I go and behold the face of God?” (Ps 42:3). Our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, has also embraced the theme, saying right on the back cover of Jesus of Nazareth: “This book is . . . my personal search ‘for the face of the Lord’” (Jesus of Nazareth, vol. 1, xxiii).

Now, in between Moses and Pope Benedict came the Incarnation, which drastically changed our approach to satisfying this basic desire to see the face of God. In the Incarnation, Jesus took a human form, a human face. During His life on Earth, the Apostles had the opportunity to see His face every day for three years. Even more, though, the saintly triumvirate of Peter, James, and John are privileged to see not just the human face of Christ, but the face of Christ transfigured in glory. Imagine: what must it have been like to be on that mountain? What did it look like? How did it affect those chosen three? Did it satisfy their desire to see Him more fully?

We don’t have the opportunity to see the face of Christ in the same way the Apostles did, so how can we satisfy our desire to see Him? I propose that, in order to see Him, we must listen; if we want to see, we have to hear. The Gospel says that the Father’s voice was heard at the Transfiguration, saying, “This is my beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased; listen to Him” (Mk 9:7). Some Scripture scholars suggest that that one line—Listen to Him—is the climax of Mark’s entire Gospel. God the Father uttered almost exactly the same words at the Baptism of Jesus in the Jordan, which is another highpoint in his Gospel (Mk 1:11), and the entire narrative of Mark appears structurally to revolve around the scene of the Transfiguration. God the Father knows that we have to hear Jesus’ words before we can really see Who He is.

It’s a mixture of the senses, much like the game “Marco Polo.” In that game, one person stands blindfolded in the middle and says, “Marco!” to which the others respond, “Polo!” Then, the blindfolded person tries to catch one of the others by following the sound of their voices. He has to hear their voices before he takes off his blindfold to see them. It’s the same with us: we need to hear the Word of God before we can see Him.

It was the same for the people of Israel, who first heard the words of God through the prophets in the days of the Old Testament. Only later did they see Jesus in the Incarnation. Another example comes from St. Paul, who was blinded at his conversion. He heard the Father’s voice, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” (Acts 9:4, 22:7, & 26:14). Only thereafter did he regain his sight, and come to recognize Christ Jesus as His Lord. We find the same pattern also in the Holy Mass. The Liturgy of the Word comes before the Liturgy of the Eucharist, so we hear Him in the Scriptures before we see Him physically, substantially present on the altar.

This is the model for how we can go about satisfying our desire to see God’s face. We can pray, spend time with Him, and listen to His voice in silence. By hearing His voice, His face comes into focus.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
    I’d much rather hear an organist play a simplified version correctly than listen to wrong notes. I invite you to download this simplified organ accompaniment for hymn #729 in the Father Brébeuf Hymnal. The hymn is “O Jesus Christ, Remember.” I’m toying with the idea of creating a whole bunch of these, to help amateur organists. The last one I uploaded was downloaded more than 1,900 times in a matter of hours—so there seems to be interest in such a project. For the record, this famous text by Oratorian priest, Father Edward Caswall (d. 1878) is often married to AURELIA, as it is in the Brébeuf Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Oh, what sighs I uttered, what tears I shed, to mingle with the waters of the torrent, while I chanted to Thee, O my God, the psalms of Holy Church in the Office of the Dead!

— ‘Isaac Jogues, upon finding Goupil’s corpse (1642)’

Recent Posts

  • “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.