• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Interview • Brandon Harvey, Founder of a New Institute

Andrew Leung · February 4, 2016

CTL The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant T IS MY PRIVILEGE to be able to interview Brandon Harvey, the founder of a new Catholic Institute, The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant. I got really excited when he first told me that he is starting this institute and his vision. He has been working really hard to “build” this new institute.

Mr. Harvey is a husband and father with a passion for the mission of the Church. He earned his undergraduate formation in theology and philosophy from Briar Cliff University (BA), graduate formation in Theology and Christian Ministry from the Franciscan University of Steubenville (MA) and did some graduate studies at the Liturgical Institute of Mundelein and the International Marian Research Institute. He is currently working on preliminary doctoral studies. He has served the Church as a Director of Religious Education, Director of Youth Ministry, Evangelization Director, Instituted Acolyte, Professor, Deacon Formation Instructor, Catechist, Speaker and Theological Consultant.

What is the Mission of The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant? How will the Institute serve the Catholic Church?

The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant strives to develop Catholic ministry leaders through a theology and methodology that flows from and is directed to the Eucharist, with formation opportunities that are practical, convenient and affordable. Following the example of Saint Francis of Assisi, the Institute reflects on and participates in the work of Christ the Servant in the Sacred Liturgy, the proclamation of the Gospel, and works of mercy.

The institute will serve the Church by empowering parish and school leaders/volunteers through its formation programs.

Who inspired you to found this new institute?

Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI is who inspires me regularly. Reading his work and seeing the example of his humility and holiness inspires me. This is why I named my first son Benedict and my second Joseph Ratzinger. Benedict XVI is known for liturgy but to be truthful, his legacy is much more. He understood the organic whole of the Church’s faith. Too often we have camps in the Church of liberal, conservative, charismatic and traditional. Benedict XVI was able to present the issues of the Church in a way that brings together all the issues important to the differing camps: evangelization and catechesis, the Sacred Liturgy, social justice etc. It also becomes clear that the ministry leaders within the Church need this same inner unity. Youth Ministry workers often organize liturgies, Social Justice Advocates often proclaim the good news, and catechists find themselves needing to evangelize. As one DRE said to me, “I was embarrassed for putting the wrong colors out for Mass and using the wrong readings at a Confirmation Mass. How was I to know? I never went to school for liturgy.”

The institute has also been inspired by listening to the needs of pastors, current ministry leaders and those that have left parish work. This has motivated us to help find new avenues to make it easier for paid and volunteer ministry leaders to receive formation regardless of their salary, educational background and their vocation.

What kind of programs will the Institute offer?

We continue to develop ways to offer academic programs without undue burden.

We are beginning to offer basic level pilots through our “professional training” programs. These will be offered on a Basic, Advanced and Master level for certification. The certification can be in either Sacred Liturgy or in Evangelization and Catechesis. These courses focus on Church teaching, ministry spirituality and methodology from a mentor currently in the trenches of ministry. Our pilot courses: Scripture, Apologetics, Catechesis, Evangelization, Youth Ministry, the Sacred Liturgy, the Baptismal Rite and Mystagogy I. These are not all the courses but simply the pilot options.

We also have some conferences in the works. Our youth conference will be July 29-31 of 2016: Champions of the Tau Youth Conference. This youth conference will be discipleship based and of a smaller size to allow this discipleship. It will also allow us to use the chapel for Mass, Adoration, Confession and the Divine Office. We will be providing catechetical breakouts for youth and breakouts just for adult chaperones to help prepare them for life after the conference. Please pray for this conference and for the recruitment of groups.

Lastly we are working on developing ministry resources in the form of evangelization programs for parishes, bible studies, publications and podcasts.

Most of our programs will be offered online with some live conferences, classes etc.

Who is teaching in your programs?

Our website currently does not have the instructors listed online until they begin teaching. They are people passionate about the Church who understand the centrality of the liturgy, have advanced degrees and are currently in the trenches of ministry life in some way.

Do you think liturgical studies are important for Catholic educators and ministry leaders? Why?

It is of great importance. Major! The liturgy, specifically the Eucharist, is the “source and summit” of all Christian life. It impacts the theology, spirituality and methodology of evangelists, catechists, youth ministry leaders, bible studies, prolife workers, peace advocates, deacons, Catholic school teachers and the list goes on.

St. Francis of Assisi should be known as a man who evangelized and catechized through his words and actions, and as a man that lived as a social justice advocate (to use language from today). What may surprise many is that St. Francis had a high volume of liturgical issues come up in his writings. Through these writings we can see how the liturgy played an important part in what he said and did. This is why St. Francis of Assisi plays an important role in the institute.

Is there anything else you would like to tell our readers?

This is an exciting time but it is also just the beginning. Please pray for us or offer Mass for the Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant, the recruitment for the youth conference and professional training pilots. Consider going to our Facebook page and helping us increase our network with amazing Catholics like all of you.

CTL The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant 3 CTL The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant 2 CTL The Ministry Institute of Christ the Servant 1
Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew Leung

Andrew Leung currently serves the music director of Vox Antiqua, conductor of the Cecilian Singers, and music director at Our Lady of China Church.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Gerard Manley Hopkins once argued that most people drank more liquids than they really needed and bet that he could go without drinking for a week. He persisted until his tongue was black and he collapsed at drill.”

— A biography of Fr. Gerard M. Hopkins (d. 1889)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up