• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Garbage in, Garbage out

Andrew R. Motyka · March 18, 2015

OMETIMES IT’S STRANGE to think about just how far computers have come in my lifetime (and I’m pretty young). I remember my family’s first computer when I was a kid, a 64kb PC. I also remember even then thinking how easy it was to mess something up. A tech-savvy friend once used the principal of GIGO – Garbage In, Garbage Out – to refer to how most computer errors are, in fact, user errors. A machine doesn’t do what you want it to do; it does what is designed to do.

I got thinking about that idea when speaking with a friend of mine a few days ago. He was telling me about a retreat that he had gone on. By his account, it was a great retreat: he came away spiritually edified, he had time for prayer and reflection, and he grew in discipleship. That sounds like a great retreat to me. His one complaint, though, was something about the music (hang on, let me practice my Surprised Face). The music was well executed, and the musicians certainly had played for Mass and devotions before. They played all the standard Catholic hits from the 80s, as well as some “Praise and Worship” music (side note: I find devotions to be a pretty good time for Praise and Worship music, actually).

What hit him a few days into the retreat, though, was what he described as, “I felt like we were singing nursery rhymes.” He is used to getting (in his words) “meat and potatoes” texts when singing at Mass, so when switching to these pieces, he felt like it was a bit dumbed down. I can relate to that.

I understand the desire for the familiar favorites that many Catholics mention when they consider their preferences of Catholic music. Most of the melodies and accompaniments are pleasant sounding, familiar, and beautiful in their own way, if simplistic. One issue with many of these preferences, though, is the lack of consideration of the text.

This tendency is one I recognize from high school. I know there are times when I expressed my dislike of a particular popular song, and was heralded as crazy. Most of the time it was because I didn’t like or relate to the words. I would usually get the response, “I like it because of the beat” or “I don’t really care about the words.” Before you know it, you’re singing along to that song, and repeating, over and over again, words that don’t represent who you are or what you believe (see John Lennon’s Imagine for a good example of this). Soon, you may even come to believe these things. You’ve said them out loud often enough.

You are shaped by the things you see and hear, but more importantly, you are shaped by the things you say and do. The Church certainly recognizes this in her simple encapsulation of liturgical theology: lex orandi, lex credendi (the law of prayer is the law of belief). We come to believe what we pray. We also come to believe what we do and what we sing. The principle lex orandi, lex credendi works both in favor of good theology and against it, and it extends beyond the liturgy into our lives. Garbage in, garbage out.

This brings me back to my friend’s retreat. He’s not normally one to complain about music or other shortcomings in the liturgy. He knows not everyone is where he is. However, he recognized something true about the music he was experiencing: it was shallow, or in his words, nursery rhymes. Such music was described to me by Leo Nestor as candy, which is fine in small amounts, but not in place of vegetables. He would also say, “Too much of that music will rot your teeth and erode your faith.” It’s been ten years since he said that in class (maybe I’m not as young as I thought), but I’ve never forgotten it.

The next time you choose a piece of music for the liturgy, ask yourself: what is this piece saying? Is there enough substance to this to spend our time putting it in our mouths? Is it even true? The text matters. In fact, it’s more important than the music because it precedes it. If a text isn’t worth reciting, it’s not worth singing. Regular readers of this website will know our preference for the propers. It’s no coincidence that the propers use Scripture as their basis for texts. It’s tough to say that a text is garbage when it comes from the Bible. That doesn’t mean that Scripture is the only text worth singing, but it’s a good benchmark.

Pay attention to your texts, and to quote Dr. Nestor again, always be careful what words you put into the mouths of the People of God.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 14 September 2025) discusses OFFERTORY ANTIPHONS and contains a wonderful quote by Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Draft Copy (Pamphlet)
    A few days ago, I posted a draft copy of this 12-page pamphlet with citations about the laity’s “full, conscious, and active participation.” Its basic point or message is that choir directors should never feel embarrassed to teach real choral music because Vatican II explicitly ordered them to do that! We’ve received tons of mail regarding that pamphlet, with many excellent suggestions for improvement. Please feel free to chime in!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Entrance Chant” • 23rd (Ordinary Time)
    This coming Sunday, 7 September 2025, is the 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). You can download the “Entrance Chant,” conveniently located at the feasts website. I also recorded a rehearsal video for it (freely available at the same website). The Communion Chant includes gorgeous verses in FAUXBOURDON. I attempted to create a rehearsal video for it, and it’s been posted at the feasts website, called by some: “church music’s best kept secret.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The argument moves from the existence of the thing to the correctness of the thing: what is, ought to be. Or, a popular variant: if a thing is, it doesn’t make any difference whether it ought to be—the correct response is to adjust, to learn to live with the thing.”

— ‘L. Brent Bozell, Jr.’

Recent Posts

  • “The Injustice of Traditionis Custodes” • (Private Meetings at the Vatican)
  • New Bulletin Article • “14 September 2025”
  • PDF Download • Croft’s “Canonic Kyrie” (SATB)
  • Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
  • “Music List” • 23rd in Ordinary Time (Year C)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.