• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Most Disturbing Change To The 1962 Missal

Jeff Ostrowski · November 3, 2014

720 John XXIII Hat HE MOST MOMENTOUS change to the Traditional Latin Mass happened before Vatican II. In 1958, Pius XII gave permission for the congregation to recite along with the priest the Mass Propers—Introit, Gradual, Offertory, and Communion. If you don’t believe me, click here to see proof.

The saintly pontiff probably didn’t realize how questionable 1 this idea was, because he was quite ill—he died just 35 days later. However, the underlying idea was in line with the liturgical movement, which sought to make the Mass more communal. By giving the congregation a greater role, it was hoped that they would follow more closely the actual liturgical prayers. Remember that phrase—“the actual liturgical prayers”—because we’ll come back to it.

I am not a person who believes that the 1962 Missal cannot be improved in any way whatsoever. For instance, I don’t think the world would have ended if permission had been given for the congregation to join in singing the Gradual 2 and Offertory Propers, set to simple Gregorian melodies accompanied by the organ. (For the record, the Commission of Pius X in 1905 had discussed circumstances under which the entire Gradual could be omitted!)

After the Council, however, things got way out of hand. For example, there was an emphasis placed on congregational singing—which is totally fine—but they threw out all the Propers and replaced them with devotional songs that were non-liturgical. Currently, less than 1% of parishes sing the Propers in the Ordinary Form. Did you catch that? In the interest of helping people follow the liturgy, they got rid of the actual liturgical prayers! I’m pretty sure that’s called “throwing the baby out with the bath water.” Furthermore, it’s essential to realize the following:

Everything communicates something. Everything.

The problem is actually worse than the illicit elimination of beautiful things like Gregorian chant. These things were replaced with something else. Moreover, so much of what was abandoned was done so according to “rational” principles. However, we’ve learned that we’re not as smart as we’d thought, and our forefathers weren’t as dumb as we’d assumed. For example, many Gregorian melodies have melismas on the “wrong” syllables; but it turns out that this is a most sophisticated and elegant way to set music.

What, therefore, can be done??

Complaining hasn’t solved much. If you or someone you know is near Los Angeles, please consider helping this new Catholic Choir. Please take a moment and forward that link to your friends who love music. Let’s show the world how a wonderful choir is the secret ingredient for great congregational singing!



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   The entire congregation trying to get through the Propers (pronunciation in Latin) along with the priest would sound horrible, and it’s not in accordance with the structure and tradition of our Rite. From the point of view of aesthetics, such an innovation can only be described as bizarre. For the record, nobody actually took advantage of this permission.

2   It’s important to recall that “Gradual” as used by Pius XII includes all the prayers between Epistle and Gospel: Tract, Sequence, Greater Alleluia, and so forth. As Adrian Fortescue has pointed out, when someone says “Gradual” it can actually mean four entirely different things…

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Extraordinary Form 1962 Missal Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
    I have argued that the OFFERTORY—at least in its ancient form—is more of a responsory than an antiphon. The 1962 Missal specifically calls it “Antiphona ad Offertorium.” From now on, I plan to use this beautiful setting (PDF) at funerals, since it cleverly inserts themes from the absolution of the body. Tons more research needs to be done on the OFFERTORY, which often is a ‘patchwork’ stitching together various beginnings and endings of biblical verses. For instance, if you examine the ancient verses for Dómine, vivífica me (30th Sunday in Ordinary Time) you’ll discover this being done in a most perplexing way. Rebecca Maloy published a very expensive book on the OFFERTORY, but it was a disappointment. Indeed, I can’t think of a single valuable insight contained in her book. What a missed opportunity!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
    As a RECESSIONAL on All Souls’ Day (November 2nd), we will sing In Paradísum Dedúcant Te Ángeli (PDF). When it comes to Gregorian Chant, this is one of the most popular “songs.” Frankly, all the prayers and chants from the traditional REQUIEM MASS (Missa exsequialis or Missa pro defunctis) are incredibly powerful and never should’ve been scuttled. Click here to hear “In Paradisum” in a recording I made this afternoon. Professor Louis Bouyer spoke of the way Bugnini “scuttled the office of the dead” in this fascinating excerpt from his memoirs. In his book, La riforma litugica (1983), Bugnini bragged—in quite a shameful way—about eliminating the ancient funeral texts, and even admitted those venerable texts were “beloved” (his word) by Catholics.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The argument moves from the existence of the thing to the correctness of the thing: what is, ought to be. Or, a popular variant: if a thing is, it doesn’t make any difference whether it ought to be—the correct response is to adjust, to learn to live with the thing.”

— ‘L. Brent Bozell, Jr.’

Recent Posts

  • “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
  • “Reader Feedback” • 5 November 2025
  • Never Work For A Priest Or Bishop Who Believes Sacred Music Should Be “Entertainment”
  • When Pilgrims Sing, the World Disappears
  • “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.