• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Jesus said to them: “I have come into this world so that a sentence may fall upon it, that those who are blind should see, and those who see should become blind. If you were blind, you would not be guilty. It is because you protest, ‘We can see clearly,’ that you cannot be rid of your guilt.”

  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Gregorian Rhythm Wars • “Feedback from Dom Stephen Concordia”

Corpus Christi Watershed · November 16, 2022

Message from Jeff Ostrowski: “I see that my colleague, Mr. Patrick Williams, has added another installment to the Gregorian Rhythm Wars series. I will certainly respond, but not immediately. I try to avoid ‘knee-jerk’ responses. My preference is to first consider carefully my response (for a few days) before posting. There is no rush. I suspect our series will continue for a considerable period of time. Needless to say, our series will only terminate once everyone agrees that my views are correct, perfect, and incontrovertible.”

M The following was sent to us
M by Dom Stephen Concordia, OSB.
M (Reproduced with permission).

FTEN HAVE I THOUGHT of writing to Corpus Christi Watershed to express my gratitude for your work. I’m writing to you now to contribute a few words to your series “Chant Rhythm Wars”. It’s sad to say that your choice of the word ‘Wars’ has been—at least at certain times in our history—accurate. I’ve been a Benedictine monk since 1989, first at Montecassino, and since 2008 at Saint Vincent Archabbey, and the debates have been at times harsh and unfair … and sometimes worse. I greatly appreciate your hospitality and willingness to engage in dialogue. By way of introduction, I first studied chant according to the Solesmes Method, and with Ward Method pedagogy, with Dr. Theodore Marier at Catholic University. Just a few years later, as an organ student at the Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music in Rome, I was required to study Semiology with Nino Albarosa, an early disciple of Dom Eugène Cardine, and Gregorian Modality with Alberto Turco, a disciple of Dom Jean Claire. I then chose to complete a DIPLOMA (Magistero) in chant with the same faculty. Since then, I have continued to be active with teaching, directing, offering workshops, and—more recently—translating recent chant textbooks by Alberto Turco from Italian to English. I’ve been a professor of Gregorian Chant at the Pontifical Liturgical Institute Sant’Anselmo (Rome); at Saint Vincent College here in Latrobe; at Franciscan University of Steubenville; at Duquesne University; and I’ve offered numerous workshops.

A. Now, regarding Mr. Jeff Ostrowski’s assertion that the Solesmes Method is the Official method of interpreting the rhythm of chant, there are numerous points of fact to the contrary:

1. Why is this supposed law known to so few practitioners?
2. At Papal liturgies where chant is sung, and a worship aid has been printed for the congregation that includes the chant melodies for the congregation to sing, the rhythmic signs of Solesmes are entirely absent.
3. The 2nd Vatican Council mandated the publication of a volume of chant for use in smaller churches and parishes; namely, the Graduale Simplex. Once again the rhythmic signs of Solesmes are entirely absent.

B. Regarding the assertion that the Solesmes Method recreates the original rhythm of chant:

The semiologists would affirm: To approach an interpretation as close as possible to an “original” rhythm there is no witness, no testimony, no factual evidence historically closer than the adiastematic neumes.

C. Regarding the predominant role of the word in chant interpretation:

1.The “composers” of Gregorian chant spoke Latin, they knew the sound of the words and their rhythmic qualities. Knowing of their passion for Latin grammar, and the Roman grammarians, it is unlikely that they would have sung in a manner contrary to the rules of Latin pronunciation. For instance… the Solesmes method does respect the words, but it also advocates for the “the subordination of the words to the melody” (Dom Gajard). This notion, together with the rule of the “indivisible beat’ cannot help but result often in mistaken pronunciations, additions of, and exaggerations of, accents.

Thank you again! With all best wishes and blessings on your work.

Fr. Stephen Concordia, O.S.B.

P.S.

Volumes of chant pedagogy by Alberto Turco and translated into English by Fr. Stephen Concordia OSB:

(1) Tones & Modes (pp.328 (treatise on Gregorian modality) Rome, Torre D’Orfeo Ed.
(2) The Gregorian Melody: The expressive Power of the WORD (pp.250) Forthcoming from Liturgical Press, March 2023
(3) An Initiation to Gregorian Chant (pp.180 Forthcoming from Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music + Vatican Editions + Archabbey Publications, December, 2022

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Gregorian Rhythm Wars, Pontifical Institute of Sacred Music Last Updated: December 6, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Music List” • 5th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 5th Sunday of Easter (18 May 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. The Communion Antiphon was ‘restored’ the 1970 Missale Romanum (a.k.a. MISSALE RECENS) from an obscure martyr’s feast. Our choir is on break this Sunday, so the selections are relatively simple in nature.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion Chant (5th Sunday of Easter)
    This coming Sunday—18 May 2025—is the 5th Sunday of Easter, Year C (MISSALE RECENS). The COMMUNION ANTIPHON “Ego Sum Vitis Vera” assigned by the Church is rather interesting, because it comes from a rare martyr’s feast: viz. Saint Vitalis of Milan. It was never part of the EDITIO VATICANA, which is the still the Church’s official edition. As a result, the musical notation had to be printed in the Ordo Cantus Missae, which appeared in 1970.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 4th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 4th Sunday of Easter (11 May 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. I don’t know a more gorgeous ENTRANCE CHANT than the one given there: Misericórdia Dómini Plena Est Terra.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    When to Sit, Stand and Kneel like it’s 1962
    There are lots of different guides to postures for Mass, but I couldn’t find one which matched our local Latin Mass, so I made this one: sit-stand-kneel-crop
    —Veronica Brandt
    The Funeral Rites of the Graduale Romanum
    Lately I have been paging through the 1974 Graduale Romanum (see p. 678 ff.) and have been fascinated by the funeral rites found therein, especially the simply-beautiful Psalmody that is appointed for all the different occasions before and after the funeral Mass: at the vigil/wake, at the house of the deceased, processing to the church, at the church, processing to the cemetery, and at the cemetery. Would that this “stational Psalmody” of the Novus Ordo funeral rites saw wider usage! If you or anyone you know have ever used it, please do let me know.
    —Daniel Tucker

Random Quote

Don Fernando de las Infantas wrote to the Pope, trying to get him to stop Palestrina from corrupting all the plainsong editions: “The errors which certain musicians, in all good faith, think they have found in plainchant are not errors at all, but on the contrary contain some of the most beautiful musical passages ever written.”

— Don Fernando de las Infantas (1578 A.D.)

Recent Posts

  • A Gentleman (Whom I Don’t Know) Approached Me After Mass Yesterday And Said…
  • “For me, Gregorian chant at the Mass was much more consonant with what the Mass truly is…” —Bp. Earl Fernandes
  • “Lindisfarne Gospels” • Created circa 705 A.D.
  • “Music List” • 5th Sunday of Easter (Year C)
  • Communion Chant (5th Sunday of Easter)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.