• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Saint Antoine Daniel KYRIALE
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

“New Gregorian Chant Project” • Part 2

Jeff Ostrowski · August 25, 2022

SYCHOLOGISTS warn against giving just one example. Suppose ‘Bobby’ wants to lose weight for multiple reasons, including: (1) fitting into clothing better; (2) feeling better about himself; (3) avoiding serious health issues; (4) attracting a wife. Then, suppose Bobby says: “One reason I’m losing weight is to fit into clothing.” According to psychologists—and they are correct—most readers will assume Bobby only cares about fitting into clothing because that was all he mentioned. Below, I give some reasons why I prefer the official rhythm … but these are only a few reasons!

Here’s the newest installment for the New Gregorian Chant Project (which you’ll be hearing a lot about over the next ten months):

*  PDF Download • 12th Sunday after Pentecost
—Dedicated to the authentic Gregorian rhythm of the Catholic Church.

The Authentic Rhythm • Some have speculated that I prefer the authentic rhythm “purely out of obedience.” It is true that Pope Pius X is my confirmation saint. It’s also true his intentions regarding the official rhythm were made clear (e.g. see Cardinal Martinelli’s letter dated 18 February 1910). But another reason I prefer the official rhythm is because—in my judgment—modifying the rhythm alters the music itself. In other words, I believe singing the Editio Vaticana the way it was intended to be sung makes better music. Furthermore, when congregations (or large groups of singers) attempt to add the thousands of extra elongations added by Dom Mocquereau, the chant becomes plodding, heavy, slow, and funereal. But the real reason I prefer the Editio Vaticana is that I’ve spent 20+ years examining the ancient plainsong manuscripts, and it seems impossible to justify elevating (“caring about”) two or three manuscripts but ignoring the powerful witness of 10,000 others. For twenty years, I’ve been asking the same question posed forcefully by Dom Eugène Cardine’s boss (when I was blessed to interview him over a period of several days). The question is, how does using a ‘Triplex’ make any sense over the notes of the Editio Vaticana, which is a CENTO edition? 1

Got Tired Of Asking • For twenty years, nobody has been able to answer this question—and I finally got tired of asking. The Editio Vaticana takes into consideration the full and complete manuscript tradition. It does not focus merely on two or three manuscripts because they’re cleaner. Nor does it focus only on two or three manuscripts because they’re more accessible. Nor does it focus on just two or three manuscripts because they’re more beautiful. In other words, just because a particular MS is cleaner, that doesn’t automatically make it “more important” than the other 10,000 manuscripts. Just because a particular MS is easy to access, that doesn’t de facto mean we can toss out the other 10,000 witnesses. Just because a particular MS was preserved with greater care, that doesn’t mean a responsible scholar will ignore the other 10,000 manuscripts.

Each Monastery Had Its Own ‘Style’ • Each monastery had its own handwriting, its own style of singing, and its own particular “tradition” of approaching plainsong. The Church under Pope Saint Pius X was wise to impose the Editio Vaticana, which is a CENTO. For example, consider this comparison PDF, which shows individual characteristics of a particular monastery (circa 1350AD). Using a ‘Triplex’ above such a manuscript would be absurd, just as it’s absurd to place a ‘Triplex’ (which favors two or three MSS) above the notes of the Editio Vaticana. Here’s an example of the Communion for the 12th Sunday after Pentecost from the 1300s:

Explore This Topic • Those intrigued by this topic are encouraged to explore these YouTube videos:

*  YouTube • “How To Read The Official Rhythm Of Gregorian Chant” (75 Minutes)
—Lecture given at Sacred Music Symposium 2022.

*  PDF Download • “Gregorian Semiology: Does It Make Sense?” (85 Minutes)
—Lecture given at Sacred Music Symposium 2022.


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   As Francis Henry Burgess (d. 1948) wrote: “The Vatican Edition is no mere reproduction of a local or partial tradition, but a CENTO resulting from an extended study and comparison of a host of manuscripts gathered from many places.”

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Abbot Joseph Pothier of Solesmes, Dom Eugène Cardine, Editio Vaticana, Gregorian Semiology, Guillaume Couture Gregorian Chant, Mocquereau Rhythmic Signs, Sémiologie grégorienne Last Updated: August 25, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

    Hymn by Cardinal Newman
    During the season of Septuagesima, we will be using this hymn by Cardinal Newman, which employs both Latin and English. (Readers probably know that Cardinal Newman was one of the world's experts when it comes to Lingua Latina.) The final verse contains a beautiful soprano descant. Father Louis Bouyer—famous theologian, close friend of Pope Paul VI, and architect of post-conciliar reforms—wrote thus vis-à-vis the elimination of Septuagesima: “I prefer to say nothing, or very little, about the new calendar, the handiwork of a trio of maniacs who suppressed (with no good reason) Septuagesima and the Octave of Pentecost and who scattered three quarters of the Saints higgledy-piddledy, all based on notions of their own devising!”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Introit • Candlemas (2 February)
    “Candlemas” • Our choir sang on February 2nd, and here's a live recording of the beautiful INTROIT: Suscépimus Deus. We had very little time to rehearse, but I think it has some very nice moments. I promise that by the 8th Sunday after Pentecost it will be perfect! (That Introit is repeated on the 8th Sunday after Pentecost.) We still need to improve, but we're definitely on the right track!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Simplified Antiphons • “Candlemas”
    Anyone who desires simplified antiphons (“psalm tone versions”) for 2 February, the Feast of the Purification—which is also known as “Candlemas” or the Feast of the Presentation—may freely download them. The texts of the antiphons are quite beautiful. From “Lumen Ad Revelatiónem Géntium” you can hear a live excerpt (Mp3). I'm not a fan of chant in octaves, but we had such limited time to rehearse, it seemed the best choice. After all, everyone should have an opportunity to learn “Lumen Ad Revelatiónem Géntium,” which summarizes Candlemas.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Friedman met Egon Wellesz in Altaussee on one of the walks, and Egon started to speak about atonal music—and Ignaz replied: “No, no, no. Melody for me.”

— From the Life of Ignazy Friedman

Recent Posts

  • Did Pope Francis Just Publicly Rebuke Roche?
  • Gregorian Rhythm Wars • “The Normal Syllabic Value” (6 Feb 2023)
  • Hymn by Cardinal Newman
  • Church Music Shouldn’t Be “Headache-Inducing”
  • Introit • Candlemas (2 February)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2023 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.