• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • About
  • Symposium
  • Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

PDF Comparison Chart • “Which Has More Scripture?” — Ordinary or Extraordinary Form?

Jeff Ostrowski · July 28, 2022

ONE BUT A FOOL would claim that War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy is a better book than To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee because it contains more words. Similarly, it would be foolish to pretend that one form of the Mass is better than another form because it contains more Scripture. Nevertheless, people often claim the EF is “not as good” as the OF because—according to them—the OF contains more Scripture. But is that true?

I wanted to find out, so I created the following chart. I was surprised to see it’s not even close! The EF contains about twice as much as the OF:

*  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART (“OF” vs. “EF”)
—“Which Has More Scripture?” The Ordinary Form or the Extraordinary Form?

Rules of the Game: I was careful to be perfectly equitable to both forms. For example, it would have been wrong to “cherry pick” certain EF feasts—such as Sabbato Quatuor Temporum Pentecostes—which has six (6) readings before the Gospel! Likewise, it would have been unfair to include the “extra” verses from Scripture that can lawfully be added to the Introit, Offertory, and Communion in the EF because not every parish adds those “extra” verses. It would also have been imprecise to assume that EF choirs will sing the beginning of the Gradual twice; it’s allowed, but not every choir does that. The Lord’s Prayer is sung in both forms, so there was no point in adding it to the chart. It would not have been fair to choose a ‘quirky’ EF day, such as Palm Sunday, since the 1961 reform eliminated Psalm 42 on that day. It should be remembered that the Ordinary Form does not always have two (2) readings before the Gospel, but on Sundays it does—so I chose a feast where the OF has a 1st and 2nd reading.

Ordinary Form Challenges: The challenge with the OF column is the post-conciliar Missal has a multitude of different options that may lawfully be chosen. In the OF, much depends upon the personal tastes and preferences of each celebrant. Many OF readings have a “long form” and “short form”—and either is allowed. Furthermore, nothing prevents the Proprium Missae from being sung in the Ordinary Form—and our website has promoted this for years—but a minority of OF parishes currently sing the Mass Propers.1 (Most OF parishes replace them with some other song or hymn.)

The Word of God: Professor László Dobszay says:

The Bible and the Gospels are holy to the very last letter. The very last “and” uttered by the Savior has meaning and conveys grace, simply because it was He who said it. Nobody has the right to select or omit the words of the Bible according to their perspective or taste. The Bible demands reverence and pious devotion, and it is only in its entirety that it has consecrating power. But another question is whether all parts of the Bible are equally suitable for becoming a pericope—able to pervade, organize and characterize the liturgical day. When we discuss the choice of pericopes, it is not the biblical text that is criticized, and no distinction is made between the status of the various holy texts as part of Divine Revelation and doctrine. All we say is that one text is not as suitable to be a pericope as another. One section might be too abstract; another can only be properly understood in its full context (together with a following paragraph to be read the following Sunday). There can be commands or recommendations worthy of the deepest consideration, yet they can lack the striking effect needed for a pericope. Different descriptions of the same events may express the liturgical meaning on different levels of perfection.

Never Repeated? Father Valentine used to say: “My favorite parts of Sacred Scripture are those which with I am the most familiar.” Some people feel Scripture should never be repeated. For example, the “Our Father”—from the Gospel of Luke, Chapter 2—is repeated at each and every Mass. Some ‘progressive Catholics’ object to this because they believe Scripture should never be repeated. They want different Scripture whenever they go to Mass (and it’s become quite common to select the ‘continuous’ readings rather than the saint’s readings although both are allowed). Generally speaking, the ‘progressive’ position is that Sacred Scripture is 100% didactic, whereas the traditional belief sees Sacred Scripture as a prayer. Indeed, the venerable praxis of the Church is that certain parts of Scripture should be repeated constantly. On the other hand, during the 1950s it was felt that “Justus Ut Palma Florebit” was repeated a bit too often—and I don’t find such a notion unjustifiable.


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   A good example is “Benedíctus es Dómine Deus patrum nostrórum” (Daniel 3), a massively long hymn that can be used as the Responsorial Psalm for Trinity Sunday in the Ordinary Form. I’d wager that fewer than 20 people in the entire universe realize this is a fully-legitimate, fully-approved, 100% correct option in the Ordinary Form.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Comparison Sacred Scripture, Professor Laszlo Dobszay Last Updated: August 5, 2022

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

For the Upcoming Choir Season!

Last week, I posted an SATB choral setting of the SANCTUS in a ‘contemporary’ style. You might want to consider this piece for two reasons: (1) It’s extremely brief; (2) Free rehearsal videos are available for each individual part. The piece is by Father Lhoumeau.

—Jeff Ostrowski
PDF Download • “Sunday Vespers” (22 pages)

When an organist accompanies Vespers, there is no time to think. It’s one thing after another: Bam – Bam – Bam. And that’s what makes Vespers difficult to accompany; there’s hardly even time to check the key signature for each piece! Therefore, although it’s far from perfect, I’m releasing this 22-page booklet:

PDF Download • SUNDAY VESPERS ACCOMPANIMENT

As time goes on, I will explain why I believe this booklet is important, my hopes for it, and why I selected the official edition, directly from the Vesperale Romanum. In spite of its imperfections, creating this (draft) booklet required much more effort than I had anticipated.

—Jeff Ostrowski
11 July 2022 • FEEDBACK

Someone who heard the CCW plainsong recordings with NOH accompaniment says: “For years I have travelled the continents and crossed the oceans of Gregorian chant in search of a composition and interpretation as sublime as this. The text and the melody are interwoven in a game of mirrors with the interpreters, the singer and the instrumentalist, so as to confer delicacy on the jubilation. The organ is soft, humble. This is what we hear from the singer. These artists have come together to produce beauty. In 1903, Pope Pius X, by motu proprio, restored Gregorian chant in the Latin Church. In his words: Sacred music must possess, to an eminent degree, the qualities proper to the liturgy, and notably the sanctity and delicacy of form, whence another characteristic spontaneously results, universality. I stress: the holiness and delicacy of forms result in universality, time and place. That is to say, sometimes the beauty of human hands gently caresses the face of the Eternal.”

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

In the place of liturgy as the fruit of development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living process of growth and development over centuries, and replaced it—as in a manufacturing process—with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.

— ‘Pope Benedict XVI, describing the postconciliar liturgical reforms’

Recent Posts

  • PDF Download • “Salve Regina” (42 Versions)
  • For the Upcoming Choir Season!
  • The continuity and vulnerability of the Novus Ordo
  • “Me? A Singer?” – Harrison’s Personal Testimony
  • Need Easy Organ Pieces? Try This Little-Known Composer

Copyright © 2022 Corpus Christi Watershed · Gabriel Lalemant on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.