• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Catholic Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

“Old Solesmes” Method • What’s That?

Jeff Ostrowski · February 23, 2021

71186-Bamberg-Lit-6-MS
71182-ESTO-Mihi-INTROIT-sm
71183-ESTO-MIHI-Introit


RECENTLY CONDUCTED an experiment. On Quinquagesima Sunday, I gave some female singers the “Old Solesmes” rhythm instead of the Dom Mocquereau method they’re used to. I didn’t tell them anything about the rhythm. I just said: “Do the best you can with this.” They sang very well during Mass, although they elongated several notes they remembered from the Dom Mocquereau version. Here’s the recording:

*  PDF Download • Introit for Quinquagesima
—According to the “pure Vaticana” rhythm; A.K.A. “Old Solesmes”.

Afterwards, when asked which they preferred, they replied: “We like the rhythmic markings.” (Perhaps they preferred the safety of the markings to the freedom of the “Old Solesmes” method.)

Terminology Matters: When you’re listening to Bach’s A-Minor Prelude and Fugue (BWV 543) somebody might erroneously say: “You’re listening to classical music.” When you’re listening to Maurice Ravel’s Jeux d’eau, that same person might also say: “You certainly love classical music!” Needless to say, none of these is classical music. The classical period is Schubert, Mozart, Beethoven, Haydn, and so forth. On the other hand, you know that most Americans have a habit of labeling “concert music” (Baroque, Romantic, Modern, Medieval, etc.) as “classical music.” It’s totally wrong, but there’s nothing we can do about it. I mention this because confusion exists regarding the term “Old Solesmes.”

A Little Bit Of History: During the 1970s and 1980s, a certain way of approaching plainsong became popular among followers of Dom Eugène Cardine. He was a monk of a Solesmes Abbey, but Dom Cardine never directed the choir at Solesmes; rather, he taught at PIMS in Rome. (Some people claim he was sent there because he didn’t get along with Dom Gajard.) Dom Cardine made clear that semiology “is not a method,” but his students—in spite of his warning—do consider it to be a method. Dom Cardine’s system was at first called “Gregorian Diplomatics,” but these days it’s always referred to as Gregorian Semiology.

A Brief Digression: Attempting to fully describe “Gregorian Semiology” in this article would be foolish. However, I can briefly say that semiology uses “educated conjecture” to guess how certain MSS may have been sung in the Middle Ages. Nobody is obliged to accept semiological ideas, because semiology is just a theory. I had the privilege of studying with Dom Cardine’s boss, and he very carefully pointed out certain obstacles Gregorian Semiology must overcome. For example, here are three reasons some scholars reject Cardine’s Semiology:

(1) It is based upon the “primary source” theory, which is not accepted today. (Incidentally, that’s the same reason it’s silly to add adiastematic neumes from the 9th century above the Editio Vaticana, which is a CENTO.)

(2) Gregorian Semiology tends to favor the “cleanest” MSS, as well as those easily available at the time, declaring those MSS to be “the most authentic.” Just because something is accessible and clean doesn’t de facto mean it’s “the most authentic.” That’s like saying a book on your shelf is better than some other book “because I can reach it without getting a ladder.” Some feel the MSS favored by Gregorian Semiology do not adequately represent the broad repertoire. (In the year 2021, of course, we have unfettered access to the most marvelous MSS—adiastematic neumes, heightened neumes, and diastematic neumes—thanks to the internet.)

(3) Those of us who understand the process by which plainsong pitches are determined have a very difficult time accepting some of the theories about diastematic notation put forth by semiologists. In reality, this process gives us clues about the rhythm of plainsong, as any thinking musician would expect.

Getting Back To The Point: When certain quarters started experimenting with Semiology, they tried to distinguish their attempts from the traditional method, which they labelled as “Old Solesmes.” This was a poor choice of words. First of all, sémiologie grégorienne itself is now an “old” theory, which many have rejected due to ancient MSS evidence made available by the internet. More importantly, “Old Solesmes”—strictly speaking—would be Abbat Pothier’s free oratorical rhythm. The Dom Mocquereau method, which has been adopted almost universally over the last 115 years, is normally described as “the classical Solesmes method.” It is often claimed—incorrectly—that Solesmes publications “abandoned the rhythmic signs in the year 2000.” In fact, Solesmes Abbey published a Gradual (not a reprint) which retained 100% of the traditional rhythmic signs—directly from the classical Solesmes method—as recently as 2012.

“Old Solesmes” Method: As we discussed in a lengthy article, the classical Solesmes method uses rhythmical signs added by Dom Mocquereau, Prior of Solesmes Abbey. In many of his prefaces, Dom Mocquereau refers to Abbat Pothier’s editions as “the old notation,” and makes clear the new Solesmes method doesn’t follow “Old Solesmes.” Let us briefly review: (a) “Old Solesmes” is the free oratorical rhythm promoted in plainsong books published at Solesmes while Dom Pothier was still there; (b) “The Classical Solesmes Method” is the rhythmic method of Dom Mocquereau, which has been almost universally adopted over the last 115 years; (c) “Gregorian Semiology” was an approach taken by certain parties circa 1975 which still has a following in certain quarters but whose tenets have come under scrutiny by scholars.

How It Began: Like so many others, I grew up with the “classic Solesmes method,” but became curious about Abbat Pothier’s method in the 1990s. At that time, I simply couldn’t understand figurations like this:

I wondered why such a phrase wasn’t written like this:

Eventually I stumbled upon the complete history of the Editio Vaticana, about which I have written so frequently over the last fifteen years. (Don’t worry, I’m not about to repeat all that!) The Vaticana adopted the rhythm of “Old Solesmes,” but—as we all know—in the end, Dom Mocquereau’s system won the day. Some important figures who supported “Old Solesmes” were Abbot Josef Pothier, Dr. Amédée Noël Gastoué, Dr. Peter Wagner, Monsignor Jules Vyverman, Dr. Karl Gustav Fellerer, Dr. Urbanus Bomm, Monsignor Francis P. Schmitt, Monsignor Jules Van Nuffel, Flor Peeters, Monsignor Johannes Overath, Joseph Gogniat, and Charles-Marie Widor. The Roman decrees said the official rhythm must be observed, but Dom Mocquereau’s method became so popular that nobody paid any attention to the Roman decrees—even in Rome itself!

What’s To Be Done: What does this mean in practice? Only a fool would attempt to implement the official rhythm when the classical Solesmes method has reigned supreme for 115 years. However, this has always bothered me, because the classical Solesmes method frequently distorts the melodies. By the way, this is not the case when it comes to the KYRIALE—which has an incredibly small amount of Melismatic Morae Vocis. (If you forgot what MMV are, try: 001 002 003) The distortions mainly happen not in the KYRIALE, but rather in the GRADUALE and the ANTIPHONALE. For instance, look how Dom Mocquereau destroyed this antiphon:

Problems With Dom Mocquereau: Dom Mocquereau’s errors would later be taken up by the Gregorian Semiology camp. Both schools erroneously apply certain nuances from particular monasteries to the Editio Vaticana, which is a CENTO. That makes no sense; it would be like applying pedal markings from Liszt to a piece by Schumann. Moreover, those markings were most likely extremely subtle indications. To make matters even worse, both the classical Solesmes method and the semiological approach ignore many of the Romanian Letters. (I personally believe they simply didn’t like some of the Romanian Letters—e.g. one of them means “hit the note like a hammer”—but that doesn’t justify ignoring them.) Abbat Pothier, in his famous de caetero letter, said the following about Dom Mocquereau’s rhythmic markings:

We will discuss this dilemma more during the coming months. I wonder if anyone would have the pluckiness to revert to “Old Solesmes.”

Addendum: I would like to add something, if I may. We recently sang Ash Wednesday, and the 1953 Schwann edition did something very peculiar. They completely forgot about this Melismatic Mora Vocis (MMV) in “Juxta Vestibulum”:

Usually they mark it one way or the other, telling the singer either: (1) to ignore the mora vocis, or (2) to elongate the note. But in this case, they missed it. The Nóva Órgani Harmónia places a dot there. Dom Mocquereau ignores it, which is typical.

Speaking of Dom Mocquereau, he often had quite a difficult time adding his rhythmic markings to the official edition, because he wasn’t allowed to change the official notes. He admits this in one of his books, talking about the (fake) Solesmes Salicus. Here’s an example of him trying to “cram” the marking on the neumes:

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Dom Eugène Cardine, Gregorian Semiology, melismatic morae vocis, Pothier De Caetero 1906, Sémiologie grégorienne Last Updated: March 3, 2021

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

Jeff Ostrowski

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

Can You Spare 33 Seconds?

Here’s an audio excerpt (33 seconds) of a setting for Kyrie VIII which was recorded live last Sunday at our parish in Los Angeles. The setting (“Missa de Angelis”) is by composer Richard Rice, and you can download the free PDF if you click here and scroll to the bottom. I think Richard’s composition is marvelous. I missed a few notes on the organ, but I’ll get them right next time.

—Jeff Ostrowski
5 April 2021 • When Girls Sing

Covid restrictions here in California are still extremely severe—switching “two weeks to flatten the curve” into “two years to flatten the curve.” Since 2020, we’ve had police breaking into our church to check if everyone is wearing a mask…even when only 5-6 people are present! But we were allowed to have a small percentage of our singers back on Easter Sunday, and here is their live recording of the ancient Catholic hymn for Eastertide: Ad Cenam Agni Providi. The girls were so very excited to sing again—you can hear it in their voices!

—Jeff Ostrowski
29 March 2021 • FEEDBACK

“E.S.” in North Dakota writes: “I just wanted to take a moment to say THANK YOU for all the hard work you have put—and continue to put—into your wonderful website. In the past two years, my parish has moved from a little house basement into a brand new church and gone from a few families receiving Low Masses twice a month to several families (and many individuals) receiving Mass every Sunday, two Saturdays a month, and every Holy Day. Our priest has been incorporating more and more High Masses and various ceremonies into our lives, which has made my job as a huge newbie choir master very trying and complicated. CCWatershed has been an invaluable resource in helping me get on my feet and know what to do!!! Thank you more than I can express! May God bless you abundantly and assist you in your work and daily lives!”

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Iconographic tradition has theologically interpreted the manger and the swaddling cloths in terms of the theology of the Fathers. The child stiffly wrapped in bandages is seen as prefiguring the hour of his death: from the outset, he is the sacrificial victim, as we shall see more closely when we examine the reference to the first-born. The manger, then, was seen as a kind of altar.”

— Pope Benedict XVI (2012)

Recent Posts

  • Did Solesmes Abbey Drink The 1960s Kool-Aid?
  • Fr. Thomas Reese • “Young People Should Not Be Allowed To Attend” Latin Mass
  • 10 Examples • “Diversity of Musical Styles” (Latin Mass)
  • Can You Spare 33 Seconds?
  • “The Great Reset” • For Your Choir?

Copyright © 2021 Corpus Christi Watershed · Charles Garnier on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.