• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Offertory Compared • “Ave Maria” (4th Sunday of Advent) vs. “Ave Maria” (Immaculate Conception)

Jeff Ostrowski · December 10, 2020

ATHER DOMINIC JOHNER (d. 1955), a student of Dom Raphael Molitor, studied briefly with the monks from Solesmes in Appuldurcombe (Isle of Wight) circa 1904. His religious name is a little confusing because it was “DOMINICUS”—so he could be called Dom Dom. Johner. His name before religious life was also confusing—“Franz-Xaver Karl”—because he could be called Fr. Fr. Johner. In any event, here’s what Dom Johner wrote about the Offertory for the Immaculate Conception: “We have here the rare instance where a new melody has been composed for the Mass text of a later feast. The melody was written by the Benedictine Dom Fonteinne and adapted by his confrère Dom Pothier. Fervor, delicacy, and sublimity combine to effect an harmonious whole. Comparison of today’s Ave Maria with that of the fourth Sunday in Advent will be very instructive. The final phrase of that composition is lacking here. The fact that mulieribus there is not final—as it is in the present case—would make the use of its melody for today impossible. This may also have occasioned the new composition for this feast.”

Watch Out! It’s not identical to the Offertory for the 4th Sunday of Advent:

*  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART
—“Ave Maria” (4th Sunday of Advent) vs. “Ave Maria” (Immac. Concep.).

The Proprium Missae for the feast of the Immaculate Conception had no consistency until 1883, when Dom Joseph Pothier adapted the melodies we know today from the Gregorian repertoire. The Offertory he took from Dom Fonteinne, Dom Guéranger’s precentor who also served as choirmaster at Solesmes Abbey before Dom Pothier. 1 Dom Fonteinne composed many Neo-Gregorian melodies, and some are still sung today, such as his “Stabat Mater,” which was included in the Editio Vaticana. In the Ordinary Form, we are used to feasts with numerous “options” for the Propers; can we see the beginning of this in the Proprium Missae for the Immaculate Conception? Prior to the publication of the Editio Vaticana in 1908, the texts for the Immaculate Conception had no consistency and the melodies were completely different, in different modes even!

Offertory • “Beata es, Virgo Maria”

Consider the Offertory for the feast of the Immaculate Conception as found in Le Graduel Romain published in the year 1800, nine years before Napoleon Bonaparte kidnapped Pope Pius VII. Notice the text (“Beata es, Virgo Maria”) is not the same as the Editio Vaticana text:

Offertory • “Concupiscet Rex Decorem”

If we go back a little further, to the Graduel De Paris, Noté Pour Les Festes Et Les Dimanches (1738AD), we see the text for the Immaculate Conception (“Concupiscet Rex Decorem”) is different:

Offertory • “Beata es, Virgo Maria”

Going to 1825AD, we see the familiar text (“Beata es, Virgo Maria”) from 1800AD, but the melody in the Graduel Romain (Tarascon, 1825) is not exactly the same:

Offertory • “Misit Deus Misericordiam Suam”

When we examine Father Michael Hermesdorff’s Graduale, published in the year 1863, we see that the Offertory text for the Immaculate Conception (“Misit Deus Misericordiam Suam”) doesn’t match any of the others!

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

In the year 1865, Friedrich Pustet published the Graduale Romanum Cantum Gregorianum Ad Missale Romanum Et Proprium Coloniense Continens, and the Offertory for the feast of the Immaculate Conception (“Ave Maria”) matches what we have today in the Editio Vaticana of 1908:

Offertory • “Beata es, Virgo Maria”

Let’s head over to Paris, now, and see what the Offertory for the Immaculate Conception is according to the Graduel Romain: Nouvelle Edition (Jacques Lecoffre, 1871). The melody and text are familiar from the examples above:

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

Another publication appeared in the same year: Graduale De Tempore Et De Sanctis: Juxta Ritum Sacrosanctae Romanae Ecclesiae Cum Cantu Pauli V. Pont. Max. Jussu Reformato (Friderici Pustet, 1871). We see the familiar “Ave Maria” text, taken from the 4th Sunday of Advent but with the ending chopped off:

Pustet reprinted—but with a different typeface—his Graduale in 1896, and you can see that nothing was changed:

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

The famous Reims-Cambrai Edition of the Graduale (1887) did exactly what Pustet did. That is to say, the Reims-Cambrai took the Offertory from the 4th Sunday of Advent and chopped off the ending. By the way, the ending was “chopped off” so it would match the Gospel reading, as you can see here:

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

Dom Pother chose a different route: viz. adapting an “Ave Maria” composed by Dom Fonteinne. This he included in his Liber Gradualis of 1883:

In all subsequent Solesmes publications, this version was included. For example, here is the Liber Usualis from 1896:

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

The official edition of the Church (“Vatican Edition”) was published in 1908: the mighty Editio Vaticana. Dom Fonteinne’s Offertory for the Immaculate Conception was included, as you can see in this 1957 reprint of the Vatican Edition, with rhythmic signs added by the monks of Solesmes:

Offertory • “Ave Maria”

Following the Second Vatican Council, the Roman Gradual generally speaking avoided Neo-Gregorian compositions, but they broke their rule for the feast of the Immaculate Conception, as we can see in the Gregorian Missal (Solesmes, 1990):

The reformers justified these Neo-Gregorian compositions as follows:

Translated into English, that means:

In putting aside the later Neo-Gregorian imitations, especially those found in the feasts of saints, only the authentic Gregorian melodies are retained, although it is always permitted for those who prefer them to sing those Neo-Gregorian compositions, since none of them has been deleted from the GRADUALE ROMANUM. Indeed, a number of them have been accepted for universal use (e.g., the solemnity of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, the feast of Christ the King, and the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary). No others have been substituted, but in other instances chants have been chosen from an authentic repertory and the same texts used whenever possible.


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   If you want to learn more about Dom Fonteinne cf. page 16-18 in The Restoration of Gregorian Chant: Solesmes and the Vatican Edition (Dom Pierre Combe, Dr. Theodore Marier, Dr. Robert Skeris, 2003).

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Editio Medicaea, Immaculate Conception Feast, Mass Propers Proprium Missae Last Updated: March 5, 2021

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Latin has been the language of the Latin liturgy for 1,600 years. It is a sign and source of unity as well as a defense of doctrine, not because of the language so much, but because it is a language no longer subject to changes. There are so many beautiful texts which can never have the same effectiveness in translation. Lastly, Latin is bound to an extremely precious heritage of melody, Gregorian chant and polyphony.”

— Cardinal Antonelli (Secretary of the Conciliar Commission on the Liturgy)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.