• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Homily — 22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A” • Father Valentine Young, OFM

Jeff Ostrowski · August 25, 2020

This coming Sunday (30 August 2020) is the 22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A. The following is a homily by Father Valentine Young, OFM, who died on 17 January 2020. We received permission to post these homilies, as well as to correct “grammatical errors, etc.” To learn more about Father Valentine, scroll to the bottom of the page. These homilies were all delivered sometime between 2013 and 2020.

Editor’s Note: When I first read this sermon, I thought Father Valentine was referring to the previous translation of the Lectionary. (Father Valentine held an extremely low opinion of the Lectionary translations which appeared immediately after the Second Vatican Council, around the time he was teaching Latin in the seminary.) However, I see that he was referring to the current translation, and you can verify this with the current USA version, the current British version, and even the 1970 USA Lectionary. The section in question is Matthew 16:25-26, which reads as follows: Quid enim prodest hómini, si mundum univérsum lucrétur, ánimae vero suae detriméntum patiátur? Aut quam dabit homo commutatiónem pro ánima sua? Father Valentine correctly points out the horrible way this has been rendered following the Second Vatican Council. Even the Protestants translate these verses into English properly, but for some reason our current “scholars” cannot. Monsignor Knox (1940s) does it correctly: How is a man the better for it, if he gains the whole world at the cost of losing his own soul? For a man’s soul, what price can be high enough? The Douay Rheims gets it right: What doth it profit a man if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul? The Westminster translation (1950s) also has no difficulty. Someone once told me that the post-conciliar translators in the United States made the decision never to use the word “soul” (anima) for ideological reasons; could this be what’s going on here? In any event, this translation is terrible, and it fills me with great sadness. This error must be corrected.

Homily • 22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A

ODERN “Catholic” theology, (I use this phrase somewhat sarcastically or cynically), does not like the expression “to lose one’s soul.” Actually, this is a rather polite or gentle way of saying “going to hell.” Sadly, I doubt that even in many Catholic schools—even in religion classes!—the idea is ever brought up to the children that if they dare to do certain things they may “lose their souls” or “go to hell.” Such a notion—we are told—might cause irreparable psychological harm that perhaps not even countless hours of counseling could cure! Who knows? Perhaps the school and perpetrating teachers might be liable to great lawsuits?

Reason for mention: My reason for mentioning this is because of the translation of today’s Gospel translation that has been foisted on us—and I purposely use that word foisted. More specifically, I’m referring to the line where we are told that Jesus said, “What profit would there be for one to gain the whole world and forfeit his life?” That is the translation we heard today, that the United States Bishops make most Catholics in the USA listen to. [See above: this shameful translation of anima has also been adopted by the bishops of Great Britain.]

Saint Ignatius and Saint Francis Xavier: Almost five hundred years ago two men met each other (I believe it was in Paris) whom we now know as Saint Francis Xavier and Saint Ignatius Loyola. Ignatius was trying to convert Francis Xavier, who at that time was far from being a saint. He quoted the part of the Bible, used in today’s Mass. I am sure he used either the Latin (Quid enim prodest hómini, si mundum univérsum lucrétur, ánimae vero suae detriméntum patiátur?) or a vernacular translation which would have been closer to our English translation, namely: “What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world but suffer the loss of his own soul?” Do you think that first translation (“forfeit his life, etc.”) would have had the same impact? I doubt it.

Language spoken: Saint Francis Xavier was probably quoting these words in Latin, which would have been the usually thing to do back in those days. I don’t even know when the Bible was first translated into Spanish. But the expression “losing one’s soul” was a rather universal expression, used in many languages—and it meant to suffer eternal damnation. Unfortunately the modern world (yes, even many in the Catholic Church!) don’t want to hear about that…and so they simply try to ignore the fact.

What fact? What fact? I’m glad you asked the question. The fact that it was, is, and always will be possible for people to suffer eternal damnation. I’m certainly not wishing that on anyone—and I actually hope that it will never happen. But when we read the entirety of the Bible, especially the four Gospels, we can’t help but get the impression from some of the things that Jesus says and does that there is a hell and it is possible for people to go there. Admittedly, this is not a very pleasant thought and no one likes to talk about it. But Jesus talked about it on occasion—and if He did, I suppose his priests should also do so, at least on occasion. I would love to believe that everyone who dies goes immediately to heaven, and if I were in charge, maybe that is how things would be. But I am not in charge. I also know that genuine Catholic teaching says we should pray for people who die. Now if we were sure they were in heaven, that wouldn’t be necessary. So let’s be consistent in our teaching.

Conclusion: The other day several of us were discussing some worldly matters, such as fake news. Fake news can take all kinds of shapes and forms. It can be outright lies. What happens then if the newscaster is caught? Later he will retract, but very quietly and unobtrusively so that most people won’t even know that he corrected himself. I doubt a day goes by without this happening. And then we people in the Catholic Church have this special problem to contend with. The official—or shall I say “guaranteed”—version of our religion is written in the Latin language, and most people have to depend on a translation to be able to understand it. Years ago, this was no problem because we could trust the translators. If I have done nothing else today, at least I have brought to your attention some very familiar words of our Lord: “What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his soul?” I know I heard these words as a child and I remembered them. I don’t think they did me any psychological harm. I think they may have helped me to try to lead a good life. Now children will be hearing: “What profit would there be for one to gain the whole world and forfeit his life?” I’ll let you decide which is the better way of presenting what Jesus was trying to tell us.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Valentine Young SERMON Last Updated: September 4, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Been to Catholic church and heard Mass. Execrable music! Organ played by a young girl who made impossible harmonies. Sermon very long. The preacher screamed loud enough to tire his lungs. The congregation was affected.”

— Louis Moreau Gottschalk (8 May 1864)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up