• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

How to Change a Hymn Without Changing It

William J. Fritz · May 15, 2020

Hymn Playing – an idea on how to vary each verse (without reharmonization and advanced techniques) and to fit the hymn to the situation

HE past few months many of us have been separated from the people, places and things we love: and for many musicians, we’ve been separated from our routine of preparing music for the liturgy.  In this time, I wanted to give everyone, organists in particular, a little thought to help them rethink their old favorites.  There is also a practical homework assignment at the end for those interested!

The art of playing hymns is a foundational part of learning to play organ (or to play keyboard in the church).  In this post, I am focusing more on the instrument of the organ than other keyboard instruments.  One glance at the literature on hymn playing yields many, many discussions of using alternate harmonization, adding layer upon layer of extra non-chord tones, re-voicing the hymn to mix up the layers of voices… Eventually you will come upon the caveat: “DO NOT OVERCOMPLICATE THINGS”.  I am reminded of some of the hymn reharmonizations of the early twentieth century (looking at you, Tertius Noble!1): either they sang hymns really slow, or the organist made life incredibly difficult for little return.  Personally, I use overly-complex reharmonizations as dictionaries of things I could do…. not as things I should do in a single verse.

In many of these texts, the author lays a lot of stress on the rule of thumb that the organist is accompanying; the organist should be aiding the singing of the hymn.  The texts say to avoid playing a series of loose, remote harmonies.  See Langlais’s reharmonization of the Passion Chorale: (‘Mon ame cherche une fin paisible’ from Neuf Pieces pour Grand Orgue): my goodness, I couldn’t imagine a congregation singing along with that!  To be fair to M. Langlais, he was not writing with singing along in mind.  A good example of reharmonized hymns that work well with a normal Sunday Mass is Noel Rawsthorne’s 400 Last Verses.  There are a few tricks he uses that work well in context and don’t jar the congregation, as well as preserving the general shape of the melody.  (Though you do have to prepare people for the reharmonization, otherwise it sometimes feels slapped on.)

Anyways, I wanted to get across to the readers of the CC Watershed website two much simpler and overlooked ways of adding variation to hymns: we’ll call them “Shape” and “Context”.  What’s the shape of the overall structure of the hymn through the verses?  And what part of the Mass/ Liturgy are we looking at?

Shape

Tell me if this is familiar: first verse, simple stops, clear harmony; second verse, a little more complex, with a deceptive cadence thrown in here and there; third verse, louder, with more alternate harmonies; fourth verse, even LOUDER with thicker harmonies…eventually you get to “PULL OUT ALL THE STOPS!!!” or do a nifty KEY CHANGE.  Basically, this way of playing a hymn matches Ravel’s Bolero: One. Big. Crescendo!  This type of shape works very well, but it’s only one shape among many.  Think of musical works that end quietly or intimately.  Think of works that maintain momentum throughout without too much up and down.  Think of the golden mean, or of making sure the climax remains at two thirds of the way through the piece (was it Rachmaninov that said that once?).  These are all shapes we can apply to our hymn-playing (as long as they serve the congregational singing).

I believe one reason that we default to O.B.C! (One. Big. Crescendo!) is because we have interiorized the claim that the vast majority of Catholics don’t want to sing.  The remedy for this must be to make it so exciting, that you can’t resist joining in.  It is exciting to ride a big wave of sound, but I would think that part of our task is to form the minds of Catholics to be able to express their faith in many and sundry ways. The voice of the Lord thunders – stripping forests bare (Psalm 29:9)   But don’t forget: The Lord was not in the storm or the fire or the earthquake…but in the still small whisper. (1 Kings 9:12)  A question I ask myself when preparing hymns is: can I shape this hymn in another way?Context

This one is important – because it can change the fundamental approach to your chosen hymns.  Are we using Hyfrydol2 for Entrance, Offertory, Communion or Recessional?  In fact, I think each of us could conceivably play Hyfrydol (or any other hymn tune) several different ways in order to fit it in the liturgy where it is played and sung.  We aren’t just talking shape here – because you could play O.B.C! in four completely different ways.

I find thinking of the context as a moment I am setting a sound track to to help.  Just take a moment and imagine the soundtrack to these four scenarios: 1) Hyfrydol as we anticipate and enter the Sanctuary 2) Hyfrydol as we gather our offerings to set them on the Altar of Sacrifice 3) Hyfrydol as we are embraced by Christ Himself in Communion 4) Hyfrydol as we triumphantly march out upon receiving salvation and witnessing victory over death.  Very different, huh?  And the best part is that you don’t even have to change the harmony, or the voicing, or the shape.

What is profoundly amazing about so many of these hymn tunes (and the lyrics) is that they support many different ways of being ‘musiked’.  You may have even changed the tempo to fit the current situation. (Yet always remaining singable and consistent in tempo throughout a single playing!).  I can imagine taking a tempo more relaxed at Communion than at Recessional.  Though we could switch that, make the Communion hymn more hopeful and infused with joy (quicker) and the Recessional grand and more expansive (slower).  We can also hold the melody line and articulate the three bottom voices, or articulate (separate slightly) all the voices…or a mix of articulated and legato playing.

Your Homework

I hope that you have an idea of what I am getting at: that we can vary the way we play hymns without resorting to more complex tricks and maneuvers.  Just simply changing the shape and being aware of the context can inform the way you play the hymn.  Here’s your homework: start with a favorite hymn of yours.  Without changing harmony or adding notes, play through it several times thinking of different shapes.  Then take that same hymn and play as if it was at a different point in the Mass.  Can you make a Recessional start loud and become intimate and wind down?  Can you play a Communion with confidence and bravado without betraying that part of the Mass? The one criteria is to not change the harmony or voicing at all.  Play the harmony from your standard hymnal.  (Dare I say, play the standard version from the Brébeuf hymnal, or would that be a shameless plug?) We’re doing an exercise in revitalizing something very familiar.  This has been on my mind in particular as I have been composing some Interludes for organ for exactly this purpose – each interlude is intended to have several ways of being played without altering the notes (I am currently calling them “Versatile Interludes”).  If you are tech-savy, maybe even record yourself playing the hymn in several different ways and upload them to Facebook or YouTube (making sure you tag @ccwatershed, and myself @cyprianstudios).  Also put the hashtag #CCWatershedHymnChallenge so that everyone can find your upload.  I look forward to hearing from you all!

 

NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   See both the 50 Free Harmonizations and also 100 Free Harmonizations of Tertius Noble. Most of the hymns have a constant presence of eighth notes, and a change of harmony sometimes every half beat.

2   Common Lyrics for the tune Hyfrydol are “Alleluia, Sing to Jesus” and “Love Divine, All Loves Excelling.”

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: May 15, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About William J. Fritz

William J. Fritz currently serves as music director at St. John the Baptist Catholic Church in Costa Mesa, CA where he resides with his wife and three boys.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Music List” • 19th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (10 August 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    This Sunday’s Communion Antiphon
    This coming Sunday—10 August 2025—is the 19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). The COMMUNION ANTIPHON is really gorgeous, and two of its features are worth mentioning. First of all, the Gospel reading assigned is from Saint Luke, whereas the the antiphon—although it matches the account—comes from Saint Matthew. (If anyone can point to a similar example, please notify me.) Furthermore, if you look at the authentic Gregorian Chant version posted on the feasts website, you’ll notice that it’s MODE III but ends on the ‘wrong’ note. A comparable instance of such a ‘transposed’ chant would be KYRIE IV.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Using “Ye” Vs. “You” Correctly
    Using “Ye” vs. “You” is rather tricky, because it depends upon which era one is trying to recreate—if that makes any sense. In other words, the rules haven’t always been the same for these two. Nevertheless, Father Philip George Caraman (the legendary Jesuit scholar) gives us a masterclass using Saint Luke’s Gospel. Father Caraman was close friends with Monsignor Ronald Knox, Evelyn Waugh, and Sir Alec Guinness.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The Pope is not an absolute monarch whose thoughts and desires are law. On the contrary: the Pope’s ministry is a guarantee of obedience to Christ and to his Word. He must not proclaim his own ideas, but rather constantly bind himself and the Church to obedience to God’s Word, in the face of every attempt to adapt it or water it down, and every form of opportunism.”

— ‘His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI (11 May 2005)’

Recent Posts

  • Is this what the new “Youth Mass” looks like?
  • “Music List” • 19th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • This Sunday’s Communion Antiphon
  • Using “Ye” Vs. “You” Correctly
  • Installment #3 • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.