• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Catholic Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

“Liturgy Wars” and Four Universal Principles

Richard J. Clark · November 13, 2015

ITH ENDLESS DEBATE about musical styles, the term “Liturgy Wars” is now a common part of the liturgical lexicon. So common, in fact, that it has lost its shock value to the point that it is in some circles not even controversial. It is an accepted reality.

In some ways, this is a healthy sign because reasonable, intelligent people need to be able to work together even when they don’t agree. Or more commonly, we may have superiors with whom we must work with even if we believe (or know) we are correct, or backed by the Liturgy Documents, etc. Catechesis is a process. A working trust is a process. Often it takes years. More realistically, it takes a lifetime.

The political reality in most every parish is that there are numerous “factions” and preferences. This requires the reality of doing many styles of music even in one liturgy. This has advantages and disadvantages—too many to discuss. But an important political reality is that when advocating for 100% purity of style or approach, one will usually leave the table with nothing. This helps no one. And the people may be cheated of ever being exposed to music that is their birthright—the Treasury of Sacred Music of the Church.

CASE CAN BE MADE for a hybrid music program in which one may chose from the “best of the best.” In some circumstances, this is the only way to introduce chant or polyphony or traditional hymnody. In many parishes, regular use or even introduction of such music is progress. It also will be something to build upon.

An important approach when utilizing multiple styles in one liturgy is to filter the music through the most important musical and liturgical principles. Regardless of styles of music we must consider the following:

1) The Three Judgments — When selecting music, 2007 US Bishop’s document Sing to the Lord: Music in Divine Worship requires that we consider three elements when choosing music: 1) Liturgical 2) Pastoral 3) Musical. I wrote a good deal more about this here. Does the music fulfill these requirements? This is an essential guideline that will help filter out lesser music, and direct our hearts and minds toward God.

2) In the liturgy, the Word is preeminent. From a liturgical perspective, it is vital to note the text of the music. All too often, the particulars of text are not considered carefully enough or at all. What is the theological content? Is the text from scripture? Is the text a setting of any of the antiphons? Different styles can go a longer way when the text correlates to the words of the Mass in this manner.

3) When rehearsing music of different styles, pay a high level of attention to universal musical principles: phrasing, diction, choral blending, etc. Apply all of these regardless of the style. It will also earn the respect of the choir, the people, and the pastor.

4) Music of all styles for the liturgy must be filtered through the prism of reverence. Reverence does not preclude energy or joy or any other emotion for that matter. In fact reverence embraces all emotions. But, the sacred liturgy requires it. If a piece cannot be reverent in some fashion, then it is probably not appropriate for the liturgy.

It is our job to make sacred music work. Some music requires more input and effort from us to make that happen. It’s our pastoral responsibility to do so in order to serve God and to serve His people.

ADVENT IS NEAR!

Hard copies and downloadable digital scores of the Communion Antiphons for Advent, published with World Library Publications.

You can listen to recordings directed by Paul French here.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

Richard J. Clark

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

Surprising Popularity!

One of our most popular downloads has proven to be the organ accompaniment to “The Monastery Hymnal” (131 pages). This book was compiled, arranged, and edited by Achille P. Bragers, who studied at the Lemmensinstituut (Belgium) about thirty years before that school produced the NOH. Bragers might be considered an example of Belgium “Stile Antico” whereas Flor Peeters and Jules Van Nuffel represented Belgium “Prima Pratica.” You can download the hymnal by Bragers at this link.

—Jeff Ostrowski
15 February 2021 • To Capitalize…?

In the Introit for the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, there is a question regarding whether to capitalize the word “christi.” The Vulgata does not, because Psalm 27 is not specifically referring to Our Lord, but rather to God’s “anointed one.” However, Missals tend to capitalize it, such as the official 1962 Missal and also a book from 1777 called Missel de Paris. Something tells me Monsignor Knox would not capitalize it.

—Jeff Ostrowski
15 February 2021 • “Sung vs. Spoken”

We have spoken quite a bit about “sung vs. spoken” antiphons. We have also noted that the texts of the Graduale Romanum sometimes don’t match the Missal texts (in the Extraordinary Form) because the Mass Propers are older than Saint Jerome’s Vulgate, and sometimes came from the ITALA versions of Sacred Scripture. On occasion, the Missal itself doesn’t match the Vulgate—cf. the Introit “Esto Mihi.” The Vulgate has: “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in domum refúgii…” but the Missal and Graduale Romanum use “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in locum refúgii…” The 1970s “spoken propers” use the traditional version, as you can see.

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“It is very curious, rather barbarous, much too ornate, immeasurably less dignified than ours now, anything in the world rather than archaic or primitive.”

— Fr. Fortescue describing the “Sarum Use” in 1912

Recent Posts

  • (Screenshots) • Proving Holy Saturday Took Place In The Morning
  • “Homily: Second Sunday of Lent” • Father Valentine Young, OFM
  • Part 2 • “Starting Your Own Traditional Latin Mass”
  • Is This Really The Same Church??
  • Solmization from the Inside

Copyright © 2021 Corpus Christi Watershed · Charles Garnier on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.