• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Liturgical Translations

Jeff Ostrowski · May 1, 2014

534 John XXIII O OFFICIAL ENGLISH translation of the Roman Gradual has ever been created. This seems rather odd when we consider that the Gradual has always been (and remains) the first option listed in the GIRM for the Entrance, Offertory, and Communion. Some have suggested that publishers could solve this problem with a hybrid translation, mixing together bits and pieces from “currently approved” liturgical translations. The editorial committee for the Jogues Illuminated Missal seriously considered such an approach, but after much deliberation, a better path was found. The Introduction contains information about the problem and its solution, and I won’t here duplicate that information. My purpose is to delve a little bit deeper. As someone who assisted in this book’s production from the very beginning, I can speak with some authority.


REMINDER: For everything which does have an official translation (e.g. the Lectionary Readings), the Jogues Illuminated Missal uses the approved versions for the United States of America.

IN 2001, THE VATICAN ISSUED an important document 1 reminding us (§36) that vernacular translations must posses a certain “uniformity” so Catholics can more easily memorize key Scripture passages, especially the Psalter. In other words, the same Psalm verse shouldn’t be translated differently when it occurs in different places. For example, the Entrance Chant, Responsorial Psalm, and Offertory should employ the same translation.

However, we’re a long way from achieving this goal. For example, consider how verses 6-7 from Psalm 68 (67) are rendered in our current USA Lectionary (based on the NAB):

The father of orphans and the defender of widows | is God in his holy dwelling.
God gives a home to the forsaken; | he leads forth prisoners to prosperity.

This differs from the translation in the actual NAB Bible:

Father of the fatherless, defender of widows— | God in his holy abode,
God gives a home to the forsaken, | who leads prisoners out to prosperity.

The Revised Grail Psalter, which is currently approved for liturgical use (and will someday replace the current Lectionary texts), renders that same verse as follows:

Father of orphans, defender of widows: | such is God in his holy place.
God gives the desolate a home to dwell in; | he leads the prisoners forth into prosperity,

The current Roman Missal (2011) gives yet another variant for the Entrance Antiphon (17th Sunday in Ordinary Time):

God is in his holy place, | God who unites those who dwell in his house;

The current Gregorian Missal of Solesmes (2012) chose a hybrid approach, and therefore adopts the Missal translation for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time. However, when an identical passage occurs in another place (Entrance Antiphon for the feast of the Holy Family), they give yet another translation:

God is in his holy dwelling place;
the God who causes us to dwell together, one at heart, in his house;

Thus, we observe five (5) different translations of the same brief Psalm passage, and all are found in current liturgical books. It should be obvious that we’re dealing with a complex problem. 2


THE PROBLEM GOES DEEPER

The problem goes deeper still. The USA liturgical books themselves are not consistent.

For example, the Latin word “QUI“ is translated three different ways for the exact same passage.

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year B   (source)
Qui custódit veritátem in saéculum,   =   The God of Jacob keeps faith forever,

26th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year C   (source)
Qui custódit veritátem in saéculum,   =   Blessed is he who keeps faith forever,

32nd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year B   (source)
Qui custódit veritátem in saéculum,   =   The LORD keeps faith forever,

Hundreds more errors have been found. For example:

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year A   (source)
Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcílians sibi,
et pósuit in nobis verbum reconciliatiónis.
God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ,
and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation.

30th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year C   (source)
Deus erat in Christo mundum reconcílians sibi,
et pósuit in nobis verbum reconciliatiónis.
God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ,
and entrusting to us the message of salvation.

Some might propose a lazy answer for these inconsistencies, suggesting that the differences come from Vulgate vs. Neo-Vulgate or Greek manuscripts vs. Latin. However, careful examination of my examples reveals that such an assertion is unsustainable and has no bearing whatsoever on the discepancies.


WHEN TRANSLATIONS ARE BAFFLING

Sometimes, our approved translations are nothing short of baffling. For example, consider the Responsorial Psalm that comes after the 2nd Reading during the Easter Vigil:

Official Latin Refrain
Consérva me, Deus, quóniam sperávi in te.
(source 1)   •   (source 2)

Current Lectionary Translation (2014)
You are my inheritance, O Lord.
(source)

For decades, publishers have sought permission to repair translations like this, but none has been granted. By law, all must follow the approved USA translations (which are under copyright). However, such errors would have been eliminated if people had followed the Vatican directive of 9/26/1964:

Missals to be used in the liturgy, however, shall contain besides the vernacular version the Latin text as well.   (source)


“THE TRANSLATOR IS A TRAITOR“

I don’t wish to enter into discussions about translation. After all, the Italians have a saying: “The translator is a traitor.” Qualified translators understand that, essentially, we translate ideas … not word-for-word. 3 At the same time, our current translations sometimes stray needlessly from the clear and traditional meaning of the text. For example:

Official Latin Antiphon from the Neo-Vulgata
R. Tu es refúgium meum, exsultatiónibus salútis circumdábis me.

Current (2014) Translation in the Lectionary
R. I turn to You, Lord, in time of trouble, and You fill me with the joy of salvation.

Some may accuse me of dwelling on insignificant discrepancies which, I concede, many priests have probably failed to notice. This isn’t surprising, since psalm paraphrases have often been employed over the past five decades. (Note: This is technically allowed by current legislation.) Furthermore, very few people realize that hundreds of “variant” texts have been approved for liturgical use in the United States, and these hardly ever resemble the official texts. For example, in a popular book by OCP, the following (approved) variant is provided for the Responsorial Psalm:

Official Lectionary Translation (2014)
Psalm 27 (26): 4
One thing I ask of the LORD; this I seek:
to dwell in the house of the LORD
all the days of my life, that I may gaze on the loveliness of the LORD and contemplate his temple.

OCP Publications Variant
Psalm 27 (26): 4
One thing I know:
I want to go there,
where I can always stay,
to gaze upon your face all my days.
…

The good news regarding this “loophole” of approved variants is that Ted Marier’s beautiful responsorial psalms can still be used. Here’s an example:

      * *  Example Score — Theodore Marier Responsorial Psalm


CONCLUSIONS

I hope this brief essay has provided some additional reasons why the editors of the Jogues Missal, Lectionary, & Gradual made their choices.

The translation we chose is fully approved for liturgical use (25 March 2014). In 1990, Paul Le Voir said our translation “is distinguished by its fidelity to the original Latin and by its tastefulness.” This is not a hybrid. It’s an elegant, accurate, modern, unified translation of the Roman Gradual. Many have chosen this exact translation for use in their books, such as:

Simple English Propers (CMAA, 2011)
Lalemant Propers (Corpus Christi Watershed, 2012)
Laudate Communion Antiphons (Motyka, 2012)
Gregorian Missal (Solesmes, 1991)
Hymn Introits for the Liturgical Year (Hillenbrand Books, 2005)

No matter how many revisions of the Roman Missal, Lectionary, or ICEL Psalm Refrains appear over the years, our translation will never go out of date, owing to its inherent properties. It can also be used with other collections (which employ a variety of translations and sources) such as:

Graduale Parvum (Birmingham Oratory, 2013)
St. Louis Gradual (Fr. Samuel Weber, forthcoming)
Collections of Propers in English (Fr. Columba Kelly, OSB)
Arbogast English Propers (WLP, 1964)
Plainchant Gradual in English (St. Mary’s Press, 1965)
American Gradual (Bruce E. Ford, 2008)
Graduale Romanum (Solesmes, 1974)
Simple Choral Gradual (Richard Rice, 2011)
Entrance, Offertory, & Communion Chants (Peter R. Johnson, 2013)

Many more could be added to this list!



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   The Fifth Instruction for the Right Implementation of the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council: Liturgiam Authenticam.

2   And I have not even mentioned Engish liturgical translations for other territories (e.g. Great Britain) or the various translations used in the Divine Office.

3   Ideology can certainly play a role, as well. Some claim that Fr. Adrian Fortescue (perhaps excessively) went out of his way to avoid cognates and “Latinate” phrases.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Graduale Romanum Roman Gradual Propers Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

[Speaking of those who wish to eliminate Latin from the liturgy.] “One may well wonder what the origin is of this new way of thinking and this sudden dislike for the past; one may well wonder why these things have been fostered.”

— Pope Saint Paul VI (15 August 1966)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.