• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Fulton Sheen & The Holy Eucharist

Jeff Ostrowski · May 25, 2013

I am against “re-publishing” Blog entries, but I made an exception below. This blog was first published about a year ago.

OME HAVE CALLED called Bishop Sheen’s book, Life of Christ (1958), his great masterpiece, and I would say it is definitely one of his finest. The Gospel of St. John, Chapter 6, contains the discourse on the Holy Eucharist. I’m not going to repeat everything Fulton Sheen said about it Life of Christ, but I strongly urge everyone to read the good bishop’s words.

The Holy Eucharist is central to the Christian faith. It’s introduction in John 6 is also accompanied by interactions with two other very important and significant things: (1) The Papacy and St. Peter (John 6: 67-69); (2) The strong possibility that Christ’s teaching on the Eucharist was what caused Judas to fall away (John 6: 71). Just for the record, Judas was not the last person to reject Christ on account of his teaching about the Holy Eucharist.

When Christ said:

I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever; and the bread that I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world.  (John 6: 51-52)

. . . a great many of his disciples no longer followed our Lord anymore. They left Him.

The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat?  (John 6: 53)

Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it?  (John 6: 61)

After this, many of His disciples went back to their old ways; and walked no more in His company.  (John 6: 67)

Remember that the Jews had been forbidden to drink blood (Leviticus 17: 10, 12). They imagined that our Lord was referring to cannibalism, and, disgusted by this notion, they followed Him no more.

They failed to realize that our Lord was not referring to cannibalism. Fr. Rumble (Radio Replies, Volume 3, no. 869) explained the Catholic understanding:

Christ is not present in the Eucharist under a form in which cannibalism could be possible. His body is really and substantially present, but not in a natural way. It is an entirely supernatural mode of presence which you may not believe, but which at least excludes all notions of cannibalism.

You can read more (URL) of what Fr. Rumble has to say. Basically, in the Blessed Sacrament, Christ is present Body, Blood, Soul, & Divinity, but under a form that makes cannibalism impossible.

There’s no question that this is mysterious and miraculous. That’s OK: so many things in our universe are. We live in a society that is obsessed with “creature comforts” (video games, materialistic pursuits, fine dining, etc.). We no longer appreciate the miraculous. We no longer wonder what it must have been like when the world and universe were created, because we’re too busy playing video games. We no longer care to think about what a miracle the human body is, or the way that the human race continues, age after age, in a miraculous way no human could ever invent. Now that I’m a parent, I appreciate the miracle that our daughter is (her little hands, organs, mouth, eyes, etc.). We have another child on the way: another miracle! Miracles abound in the natural universe: the sun rising in the sky, the moon at night, the bugs, microscopic organisms, animals, plants, etc. The way that the earth’s water literally “recycles” itself, year after year, century after century. It evaporates, becomes clouds, rains down upon the earth, travels through the rivers, waters plants, then evaporates again. We never think about these miracles because, quite frankly, we’re too busy playing video games, or otherwise seeking worldly pleasures.

Christ expected those who had seen Him work miracles to have a faith in His words, but they left Him.

Christ still expects us to have faith in His words. It seems to me that St. Thérèse of Lisieux, in one of her letters, explained why Christ did that. I cannot remember her exact words, but she basically said, “Christ asks us to have faith in Him, no matter what, because He desires our poor souls so very much. If we experience trials and tribulations when it comes to faith in God, let us remember this.” I think St. John mary Vianney said pretty much the same thing.

In other words, what have we to offer up? We have running water, modern medicine, computers, television, radio, phones, modern medicine, cars, heaters, air condition, modern medicine, modern plumbing, clean food, clear water, (did I mention modern medicine?), and so many other things that no civilization ever had. People used to die at age 35. Infant mortality was tremendous. Doctors and their various treatments were AWFUL and BRUTAL. Penicillin and anesthesia had not been discovered. What have we to offer up?

Christ, therefore, asks us to give Him a very easy thing: our faith in Him! Let us never fail to do so.

One more thing: I remember serving Mass for an old Irish priest. In the sacristy before Mass, he said, “You know, it’s a good thing Christ does hide Himself from us in the Holy Eucharist, under the forms of bread and wine. We could not bear to look upon His Infinite Purity and Holiness.” I thought this was a powerful insight.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Bishop Fulton J Sheen, Eucharist Not Cannibalism, Leslie Rumble Radio Replies, The Holy Eucharist Last Updated: October 4, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Always remember: God opposes the proud.” (leaning into the microphone) “…even when they’re right!”

— ‘Scott Hahn, speaking in Plano, TX’

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Goofy 1974 Hymn • “A Man Can Kill With a Gun, a Bomb, or a Lance”
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.