Views from the Choir Loft

Solesmes Salicus & Scandicus Vs. Pure Vatican Edition

Jeff Ostrowski · April 29, 2013

OSTING ABOUT THIS SUBJECT probably makes me an official geek, but here goes. Those who carefully examine yesterday’s Communion Proper (5th Sunday of Easter, Year C) will notice that there are major discrepancies between how it is printed in the ORDO CANTUS MISSAE and the Solesmes Gregorian Missal of 1989. The ORDO CANTUS MISSAE was printed in 1970, 1974, and again in 1988. There are so many important discrepancies, I will not show them, because it would take too long. However, the excerpts below serve as good examples of what I’m talking about. The RED ARROWS are from the ORDO CANTUS MISSAE (1988) and the PURPLE ARROWS are from the Gregorian Missal:

Errors like these happen approximately five times, which is quite remarkable considering Ego Sum Vitis Vera is an extremely short chant. Anyone who has read my article in Sacred Music (Winter 2008) realizes the deep significance of these discrepancies. Furthermore, they would be easier to account for if the chant were printed by the Pothier Commission, but this chant was first added in 1970.

Here’s my 2008 article, for those who care:

* * The Rhythm of the Vatican Edition (Winter 2008) [pdf]

And here’s a series of videos you can watch, if the article doesn’t make sense to you:

* * Video Presentation on the Vatican Rhythm of the Chant

But the easiest way to understand what I’m talking about is to read “Lesson 8” found here:

* * How to Read and Sing Gregorian Chant

Happy Geek-ing!!!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Bugnini’s Statement (6 November 1966)

With each passing day, more is revealed about how the enemies of the liturgy accomplished their goals. For instance, Hannibal Bugnini deeply resented the way Vatican II said Gregorian Chant “must be given first place in liturgical services.” On 6 November 1966, his cadre wrote a letter attempting to justify the elimination of Gregorian Chant with this brazen statement: “What really gives a Mass its tone is not so much the songs as it is the prayers and readings.” Bugnini’s cadre then attacked the very heart of Gregorian Chant (viz. the Proprium Missae), bemoaning how the Proprium Missae “is completely new each Sunday and feast day.” There is much more to be said about this topic. Stay tuned.

—Jeff Ostrowski

Luis Martínez Must Go!

Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]

—Jeff Ostrowski

Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!

A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!

—Jeff Ostrowski

Pope Pius XII Hymnal?

Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.

—Corpus Christi Watershed

“Hybrid” Chant Notation?

Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.

—Corpus Christi Watershed

Antiphons Don’t Match?

A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).

—Corpus Christi Watershed