• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Guide for Large-Scale Celebrations

Fr. David Friel · May 22, 2016

ARGE-SCALE liturgical celebrations are not infrequent in the modern, globalized world. I have been part of several, myself, including during papal Apostolic journeys, World Youth Days, and the World Meeting of Families last September. The quality of such celebrations has varied widely, from the carefully executed liturgies of Pope Benedict XVI’s very successful UK visit to many less worthy celebrations.

Following the 2005 Synod of Bishops, the CDW started work on a document that would provide guidelines for such circumstances. An initial document was published in 2007 in Italian (Le grandi celebrazioni: una riflessione in corso, Notitiae 43, 2007, 535-542). In 2014, the document was revised and expanded, but published only in Italian and Spanish. Now, the USCCB Secretariat of Divine Worship has commissioned an unofficial English translation of the 2014 document, for the benefit of all who contribute to the organization of large liturgical gatherings.

Here are ten points made in the text that are noteworthy:

1. The new English translation is available in the current (March-April 2016) issue of NewsLetter, published by the USCCB Committee on Divine Worship (more information here). Following are a few observations about this overall very good document:

2. One section of the document (paragraph 12) deals directly with sacred music. Notably, it states that, “While attention should be given to different praiseworthy approaches and traditions, Gregorian chant, proper to the Roman Liturgy, retains its constant value.”

3. The same section addresses matters of language, including this praise for the use of the language of the Church: “In a celebration of international character, so as better to express the unity and universality of the Church, a more ample place can be given to the Latin language.”

4. Another section (paragraph 22) deals with the location of the schola, suggesting that the singers be placed outside the sanctuary and facing the altar, so as to help the choir exercise their function more easily and to make “full participation in the Mass easier for everyone.”

5. Surprisingly, this Guide encourages (paragraph 27) that the Eucharistic Prayer, or at least the words of consecration, be sung, “since in addition to highlighting the sacred character of the Prayer, this makes it easier to synchronize the words.”

6. The document (in paragraph 8) encourages organizers of major liturgies to consider whether the liturgy celebrated should be Mass or something else.

“The celebration of the Mass presupposes and requires that those gathered in the Lord’s name are able to feel that they are part of a praying assembly . . . and that the concelebrating priests can manifest their essential connection to the altar. For this reason, it is well on occasion to consider whether it is opportune to have Mass or whether it might not be preferable, given the circumstances, to opt for another type of liturgical celebration or prayer service.”

Other options given include the Divine Office, a celebration of the Word of God, a solemn procession of the Blessed Sacrament, exposition/benediction, or a prayer vigil.

7. Paragraph 26 deals with the offertory. When it is not possible to fit all the elements to be sacrificed on the altar, itself, a strange recommendation is made. In this case, “prior to the presentation of the gifts, some non-concelebrating priests, deacons, or instituted acolytes, carrying a ciborium in their hands, should position themselves near the altar.” This, I believe, is common practice at large papal Masses.

8. There is a laudable encouragement (in paragraph 6) that the Sacrament of Penance be made available in advance (or even during) large-scale Masses.

9. There is a curious directive (in paragraph 25) that “large-scale celebrations are a case in which the chair would seem to be the most suitable place for holding the homily.” I say this is curious only because there is no explanation given for why this is to be preferred more at large-scale celebrations than at other liturgies.

10. A whole paragraph (13) is devoted to the role of silence in large-scale liturgies. This reminds me of the unforgettable experience I had during Eucharistic adoration on Copacabana Beach at WYD 2013, when three million people fell utterly silent.

Many other recommendations are made in this Guide for Large-Scale Celebrations. These ten points are simply those that most caught my attention.

If anything were to be added, I would recommend something along the lines of the remarks Msgr. Guido Marini made to those of us serving the closing Mass at the World Meeting of Families last September (see HERE for a summary). These deeply insightful remarks would serve as a great addendum to the very good Guide for Large-Scale Celebrations.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Gregorian Chant, Latin, On the Manner of Distributing Holy Communion Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Gregorian chant is the sacred chant, proper and principal of the Roman Church. Therefore, not only can it be used in all liturgical actions, but unless there are mitigating circumstances, it is preferable to use it instead of other kinds of sacred music.”

— §16, De Musica Sacra (1958)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.