• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Why Do Priests Care So Much For The Liturgy and Sacred Music?

Guest Author · March 20, 2014

0319_Altar_boys_prep_LG S A NEWLY ORDAINED priest, I am sometimes questioned why priests care so much for the liturgy and sacred music and, especially among the newly ordained, have such a desire for liturgical and musical elements that are authentically Catholic and deeply rooted in tradition. It can be difficult to answer these questions to the fullest extent when they are asked after Mass or in the sacristy. Many people, it would seem, though coming to the priest with goodwill, think that such desires are old-fashioned or nit-picky.

The Second Vatican Council states in its document Presbyterorum Ordinis (the Decree on the Ministry and Life of Priests) that “priests will acquire holiness in their own distinctive way by exercising their functions sincerely and tirelessly in the Spirit of Christ” (no. 13). Here it can be seen that priests (1) have a distinctive way of acquiring holiness and (2) it is obtained by the exercise of their functions. This does not, in any way, reduce the priesthood to mere functionalism. In fact, just the opposite is stated by the council. It is indeed in the exercise of the priest’s function where he can acquire holiness, but not just in his function, but in the sincere and tireless exercise of that function in the Spirit of Christ. This is an important aspect of how the priest can acquire holiness. It must be in the spirit of Christ. Thus, any acquisition of holiness is not for one’s personal gain but rather done in the spirit of Christ which means it is done in charity, humility, etc.

The council fathers also describe that the priest is the one who offers sacrifice. The decree states, “in the mystery of the Eucharistic sacrifice, in which priests fulfill their principal function, the work of our redemption is continually carried out” (no. 13). The document then stresses that this is why the daily celebration of the Mass is recommended. As it has been seen above, the acquisition of priestly holiness is obtained through the exercise of the priest’s function. Now if the priest’s principal function is the celebration of the Eucharistic sacrifice, it would seem logical that the principal way that a priest would obtain perfection is through its celebration. Thus, when looking at priestly spirituality, the Eucharistic celebration is fundamental: perhaps the most fundamental element of all the elements of a priestly spirituality and the desire, therefore, for the worthy and beautiful celebration of the Eucharistic liturgy shows how important this element is to the priest.

In the Eucharist, a priest finds pastoral charity which is the bond of priestly perfection, that is, priestly holiness. Hence, it can be easily stated that the Eucharist is truly the center and source of the life of the priest. The council fathers urge priests then to penetrate ever more intimately through prayer into the mystery of Christ. Thus, from all of this, it can be said that the spirituality of the diocesan priest is first and foremost a Eucharistic spirituality.

ERHAPS BY NOW you have been able to see what I am getting at: the way that priests acquire holiness is by exercising their functions, and exercising them sincerely and tirelessly in the Spirit of Christ. The function of the priest is to offer sacrifice and the principal sacrifice of the Eucharistic sacrifice, the Holy Mass. In this sacrifice, the priest not only acquires holiness but also finds pastoral charity. Thus, why would a priest care so much about the liturgy and sacred music? It is because these are elements of the priest’s principal function and his way of acquiring both holiness and pastoral charity. In caring so much for elements of liturgy and sacred music that are authentically Catholic and deeply rooted in tradition, a priest is doing nothing else but carrying out his principal function in the best way possible: a function that will ultimately help him get to Heaven and to bring others to Heaven, as well.

Finally, the Directory for the Ministry and Life of Priests (2013) states that in today’s world, with the proliferation of new sects and cults, there is “an eminently pastoral necessity for the priest to be a man of God and a master of prayer” (no. 47). The 1994 English edition of the Directory stated ‘teacher’ in place of ‘master.’ The Italian translation of the 2013 edition uses the word maestro which can mean master, but also teacher, guide, or leader. This document sets out clearly that it is part of the priest’s pastoral ministry to be able to teach and guide people how to pray. Priests are called to imitate Christ; hence, just as the disciples asked the Lord to teach them to pray, the priest is called to imitate Jesus and teach those entrusted to his care how to pray. Thus for the priest, becoming a teacher of prayer is closely bound to his spirituality, which is first and foremost a Eucharistic spirituality. By being a teacher of prayer, his spirituality becomes something that is not simply within himself or even simply between him and God, but it is missionary, apostolic―it sends him out. The priest, therefore, must daily teach people how to pray: through the scriptures, through the liturgy and preaching, and through his life.

In conclusion, the answer to the question of why do priests care so much about the liturgy and sacred music is firstly because they are the main elements of his function (to offer the Eucharistic sacrifice) and it is through his function that the priest acquires holiness and pastoral charity. Furthermore, part of the priest’s pastoral charity is to teach and lead people in prayer, especially through the worthy and beautiful celebration of the Eucharist, the source and summit of the Christian life.


We hope you enjoyed this guest article by Fr. Alan M. Guanella.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Leave the Mass alone. Our churches are full—the Protestants, in spite of their vernacular, far otherwise.”

— Cardinal Godfrey (one of the Vatican II fathers)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.