• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Homily: 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year A)

Guest Author · July 27, 2014

0319_17_OT_A-MED T COULD BE INTERESTING if we asked people their opinion as to what Jesus meant when he said the kingdom of heaven was like a treasure buried in a field that someone finds. He first hides the treasure so that no one else will find it, and then sells all he has to be able to buy the field and then buys it. Certainly this man was determined to get that field. And the same idea is there in regard to the pearl of great price. Now I have always just taken for granted that Jesus was trying to impress on us the importance of acquiring the kingdom of heaven or simply going to heaven after I die. But the thought struck me maybe this idea not necessarily so clear to everyone who hears or reads this parable. I guess the only or more likely way that I would ever find out would be if I were conducting some kind of a bible class and we were discussing this part of the bible. However, I do think that applying this idea to our working for heaven and the importance we should give to it, certainly fits in with the idea.

THE THIRD PARABLE of the catch of fish is perhaps a little different. Here Jesus brings up an idea that maybe is not too popular even in some of our Catholic Churches nowadays. If I were to ask the question, whom do those fish that are discarded or thrown away represent; many would not like to hear the answer. Nowadays we don’t like to think of anyone going anywhere but to heaven. And of course that is very nice, but I’m not so sure that it is realistic. Not too long ago I was talking with a priest who said that he did not believe that there was anyone in hell. I told him that was a very nice thought, and I too would love to believe it, but I don’t think we can count on it. After all why did Jesus tell a parable like He did in today’s third little story? Just because we don’t think anyone might go to hell or don’t believe anyone would go to hell, or don’t believe that there is a hell, doesn’t take away the reality of hell or the possibility that we can go there if we don’t live the right kind of lives. Wishing it will not make it go away.

I think it is quite a disservice to the people if a priest never says anything about the existence of hell or punishment for sin. I’m not saying that these should be his only topics. Just as in a family the parents should not always being laying down rules and punishments for disobeying the rules. But that doesn’t mean there should not be rules or consequences for the non-observance of them. It is a real disservice to the children if there is no discipline in the home. It certainly is a poor preparation for the children in later life. Unfortunately many of the ills in present day society can probably be traced back to the lack of discipline and/or proper training in the home. In my instructions to couples wanting to get married I point out to them that one of our greatest blessings is to have come from a good family, to have had good parents. I encouraged the soon to be wed couple to try to provide for themselves and their children the best family life that they possibly can. That is one of the greatest things that any parent can provide for their children. Incidentally it doesn’t depend upon the amount of wealth that one might have.

IN THE FIRST READING we see that God was very pleased with Solomon’s request for wisdom instead of riches or a long life, or victory in battle. The Wisdom of Solomon has become proverbial. Wisdom is something higher than just knowledge. Wisdom implies knowing how to use one’s knowledge in the right way. Wisdom knows how to use one’s time and wealth and efforts for the things that really matter, for the things that will last forever. That is why the question: “How will this affect my eternal salvation” is such an important question and should be reflected upon and asked frequently.

In some respects I think one of the most important and practical things that St. Paul ever wrote is the first line from today’s selection of his letter to the Romans: We know that all things work together for good for those who love God. I have seen that happen so often in my life and I feel confident the same is true for you. Just reflect back on some of the difficult situations that you’ve had to face. You didn’t know how they were going to work out, but somehow, some way, they did. You’re still here; I’m still here. God has taken care of us up to this point. Is there any reason to doubt that He will not continue to do so? No. None at all.


We hope you enjoyed this homily by Fr. Valentine Young, OFM.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“For the Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands, eat not, holding the tradition of the elders”—is that English idiom? “For the Nazis, and all the Germans, except they say Heil Hitler! meet not in the street, holding their lives valuable”—is that English idiom?

— Monsignor Ronald Knox

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.