• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Basic Steps To Improve Music At Your Parish — Part 1

Andrew R. Motyka · July 16, 2014

WO WEEKS AGO, I was blessed to give a presentation at the annual CMAA Colloquium here in Indianapolis. My presentation was about slowly implementing the propers in the “average” parish. I will try to reproduce it sometime for a blog. For now, we here at Watershed are embarking on a similar project: what are some simple ways, some “first steps,” to improving music at the average parish level?

I think that, in order to have this conversation, we have to establish what that average parish looks like. It likely uses a mainstream hymnal, and all music selections are from the suggestions provided by those publishers. They may use hymns, “praise and worship” music, or other contemporary and traditional styles, but for the most part, the model is still the Four Hymn Sandwich. Propers are never done, and the large majority of the parish is not even aware of their existence apart from those short verses included in the missalette. Instrumentation ranges from piano to guitar, sometimes using the organ, but a capella music is never used.

NOW, AS CRITICAL AS THAT PICTURE LOOKS, I do not draw it in mockery or scorn; I draw it in realism. If we have an unrealistic view of what our parishes look like now, we have little chance of improving the liturgy to where it could be. So where does one begin? Let’s say I have been hired as the new music director of St. Everyman here. What do I do first?

IRST, we need to establish a rapport with the parishioners. Music reform doesn’t exist in a top-down model, and when you’re the new guy/gal, you don’t have a lot of capital to spend in implementing changes. Get to know the parishioners, and get to love them. When your guidance comes from a place of love, you will go much further, and they will trust you much more. Always respect people more than systems.

ECOND, and this cannot be stressed enough: go slowly. I know you see a bleak liturgical picture here, and your instinct is to change just about everything, but if you go too fast with the changes, you will lose everything. You may experience serious pushback, or worse yet, your pastor will. This is how good, talented people lose their jobs, and the person they hire after you will not be interested in moving forward. Be patient and keep your eye on the long game.

HIRD, on to the musical shifts. The very first thing you should do is start working on your pastor to intone the dialogues. These are not difficult, and there are numerous print and online resources to assist in learning to sing the Mass. The sung dialogues can be inserted right into the liturgy as described above, with no other changes. Get the people used to singing everything. Even keeping praise and worship in place, the reverence of the liturgy will be greatly improved simply by starting with a sung Sign of the Cross and Preface Dialogue.

OURTH (Jeff told us to focus on one thing, but I just can’t stop), the first actual change to the music should be at Communion. Begin singing responsorial-style psalmody during the Communion procession. It doesn’t matter whether they are propers, simple psalms, or even the singer-songwriter psalm settings so ubiquitous at the parish level. Get people used to hearing psalms as the proper music for the Mass. The hymnal isn’t the Church’s songbook; the Psalter is. Also, there is the practical matter that no one carries a hymnal to receive the Eucharist. If you use a simple antiphon response, people will be encouraged to sing even during that point of the Mass, as is the norm set forth in the GIRM (whether this is a good idea or not is a discussion for another time).

Good luck with your new parish! The above suggestions should take you no less than a year, unless you are being pushed by your pastor. Take your time and allow the new concepts to sink in before you move on to another one. Keep your eye on the prize and remember that it takes far longer to build something up than to tear it down. Start slowly and set in place improvements that will last.


7-part series:   “Basic Steps To Improve Music At Your Parish”

FIRST PART • Andrew Motyka

SECOND PART • Peter Kwasniewski

THIRD PART • Richard Clark

FOURTH PART • Veronica Brandt

FIFTH PART • Fr. David Friel

SIXTH PART • Jeff Ostrowski

SEVENTH PART • Aurelio Porfiri

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Basic Steps To Improve Parish Music, Simple Steps To Improve Parish Music Last Updated: March 1, 2025

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Goupil deserves the name of martyr not only because he has been murdered by the enemies of God and His Church while laboring in ardent charity for his neighbor, but most of all because he was killed for being at prayer and notably for making the Sign of the Cross.

— St. Isaac Jogues (after the martyrdom of Saint René Goupil)

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Goofy 1974 Hymn • “A Man Can Kill With a Gun, a Bomb, or a Lance”
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.