Views from the Choir Loft

Lesson 2: Intervallic Relationships

I’ve already mentioned that songs can begin on any pitch, but the intervallic relationships must not be changed. Let us now explore these intervallic relationships.

We usually use “solfege” (Do Re Mi Fa Sol La Ti Do) to help us learn these intervallic relationships. Instead of solfege, the French often use numbers (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8). Either system is fine:

You probably noticed there isn’t quite as much space between two steps: MI-FA and TI-DO. This is because MI-FA and TI-DO are “half steps.” All the other steps (for instance, DO-RE) are “whole steps.” It is absolutely essential (and I cannot stress this enough) that you memorize MI-FA and TI-DO as being half steps. In the following video, I start on four different starting pitches, and then (always keeping the intervallic relationships inviolable) go up the first four notes. See if you can hear that MI-FA (the half step) is not as wide an interval as the other steps:

In the next video, I demonstrate the aural difference between an ascending half step and an ascending whole step. I could have chosen any ascending whole step (e.g. SOL-LA) or any ascending half step (e.g. TI-DO), but I chose DO-RE and MI-FA:

In the next video, I show the demonstrate difference between a descending half step and a descending whole step. I could have used any descending whole step (e.g. MI-RE) or descending half step (e.g. FA-MI), but I chose LA-SOL and DO-TI:

Surprising Popularity!

One of our most popular downloads has proven to be the organ accompaniment to “The Monastery Hymnal” (131 pages). This book was compiled, arranged, and edited by Achille P. Bragers, who studied at the Lemmensinstituut (Belgium) about thirty years before that school produced the NOH. Bragers might be considered an example of Belgium “Stile Antico” whereas Flor Peeters and Jules Van Nuffel represented Belgium “Prima Pratica.” You can download the hymnal by Bragers at this link.

—Jeff Ostrowski

15 February 2021 • To Capitalize…?

In the Introit for the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, there is a question regarding whether to capitalize the word “christi.” The Vulgata does not, because Psalm 27 is not specifically referring to Our Lord, but rather to God’s “anointed one.” However, Missals tend to capitalize it, such as the official 1962 Missal and also a book from 1777 called Missel de Paris. Something tells me Monsignor Knox would not capitalize it.

—Jeff Ostrowski

15 February 2021 • “Sung vs. Spoken”

We have spoken quite a bit about “sung vs. spoken” antiphons. We have also noted that the texts of the Graduale Romanum sometimes don’t match the Missal texts (in the Extraordinary Form) because the Mass Propers are older than Saint Jerome’s Vulgate, and sometimes came from the ITALA versions of Sacred Scripture. On occasion, the Missal itself doesn’t match the Vulgate—cf. the Introit “Esto Mihi.” The Vulgate has: “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in domum refúgii…” but the Missal and Graduale Romanum use “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in locum refúgii…” The 1970s “spoken propers” use the traditional version, as you can see.

—Jeff Ostrowski