• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Why Choir Directors Fail” • Six Reasons

Jeff Ostrowski · April 22, 2025

ELICOPTER PARENTS. Do you know what those are? They’re parents who ‘hover’ around their children, never letting them out of their sight. While supervising children is praiseworthy, it becomes unhealthy when children fail to learn independence. As of the year 2025, a new phenomenon has emerged: viz. parents who go overboard supervising their children in real life but neglect to watch over their children’s online activity. (The internet is replete with dangers.) Our blog reaches all kinds of people. Some are malicious,1 filled with hatred. That’s the “cost of doing business” when it comes to the internet. But we’re not publishing for their benefit. We publish for the good Catholic musicians out there—and they do indeed exist. These generous, happy, righteous members of our readership keep us going. They give us strength! Their benevolent support is what prevents us from becoming discouraged and depressed.

Today, I’d like to offer some reflections on why some choir directors fail. Obviously, this will not be an exhaustive list. (If you want that, you should consider attending Sacred Music Symposium 2025.)

I’m not sure 100% of my colleagues will agree with my list. But that’s okay—because online articles allow each reader to take what’s valuable and discard the rest!

➕ Reason #1
Lack of Laser Focus

The conscientious choirmaster must have a laser focus on the upcoming performance. Monsignor Robert Skeris used to talk about “the coach and the music teacher.” Out of all who teach in a school, only the coach and the music teacher have to display their results publicly. Nobody wants to be humiliated; and that’s where a “laser focus” comes into play. From the first instant, the conscientious choirmaster must realize his choir will have to perform in public very soon. To give an example: a few days ago, our choir sang for Easter Sunday Mass. For that particular Mass, 580 people showed up. (Each Sunday, our parish has four Masses—but there aren’t usually 580 for each Mass.) The church was absolutely packed, and people even crowded into the choir loft because there just wasn’t enough room.

But our volunteers rose to the occasion. They really hit it out of the park. They weren’t nervous to sing in front of 580 people—because they had been prepared. In the following excerpt, notice how splendid they sound when the SATB harmonies enter:

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

But many choir directors lack this “laser focus.” Instead, they spend weeks doing vocal warm-ups, wasting time passing out music, working on pieces which will ultimately be abandoned, telling stories about composers, talking about politics, and so forth. And then they wonder why their choir sounds weak, unsure, and nervous when they sing in public!

When it comes to this “laser focus,” we’ll discuss some crucial techniques during Sacred Music Symposium 2025.

➕ Reason #2
Advice from the Unqualified

A serious pitfall which must be avoided is the chorus of terminally-online “experts” who inhabit social media, internet forums, blogs, and so forth. Each day, these folks spend hours proffering unsolicited advice to anyone willing to listen. The problem is, 99% of these people have never stood before a choir in real life. (Otherwise, they wouldn’t have hours of free time to pontificate online, because conducting a choir is hard work.) Their advice—which they assert with unshakable confidence—is almost always reprehensible and dangerous. The quickest way to learn whether someone is legitimate is to ask: “Can I hear a recording of your choir singing that piece?” Once the person admits he has never conducted a choir in real life … what more is there to be said?

Such online “experts” frequently encourage directors to program music too difficult for church choirs, and often don’t understand the importance of tessitura. Furthermore, because they have never stood in front of a choir in real life, they don’t realize singers can become nervous. The conscientious choirmaster must search diligently for music which sounds fantastic but isn’t too difficult. A good example would be the INNSBRUCK HYMN, which Sebastian Bach loved so dearly. My volunteer choir sang this on Easter Sunday during Communion—in front of 580 people!—and you can hear how glorious it sounded:

To access this hymn’s media in the Brébeuf Portal, click here.

➕ Reason #3
Inconsiderate

Some choir directors fail because they’re inconsiderate. They don’t realize their singers are busy! They have their own lives; they have obligations; they have jobs; they have wives and children; they have personal difficulties and health issues; and so forth. Their lack of consideration can frequently be observed during Holy Week. Inexperienced choir directors will fail to plan ahead. Then—because they didn’t plan ahead—they force their singers to participate in lengthy rehearsals during Holy Week. A few years ago, I remember a choir director bragging online about how his choir had a 4-hour rehearsal on Palm Sunday! And then such people wonder why their singers don’t come back…

When there’s just too much music to learn, it’s okay to let singers with more experience handle some of the selections. On Easter Sunday, for example, we had a mother and daughter—both excellent singers—handle the INTROIT. You can hear how wonderful it sounded:

*  Mp3 Download • Resurréxi (Excerpt)

I mentioned that our 10:00am Mass on Easter Sunday had 580 people. I asked my assistant, Kaitrin Drost, to sing the Chabanel Responsorial Psalm with her daughter. (I accompanied them on the pipe organ.) They weren’t nervous at all. In the following excerpt, you can hear parishioners whispering all around them. That’s because—due to the large attendance—there were literally members of the congregation standing in the choir loft:

*  Mp3 Download • CHABANEL PSALM (Excerpt)

One reason they sound so good is because they contrast with the large choir. In other words, everyone sings their part: Priest, deacon, congregation, soloists, cantors, and full choir.

➕ Reason #4
Failure to Steal

Some choirmasters fail because of their “lack of theft.” Let me explain what I mean by that. I believe a successful choirmaster should go everywhere possible and observe excellent conductors. They should sing in as many choirs as possible. They should steal every technique they can. But instead of observing what others do, some choir directors spend all day on the internet. They type hundreds of comments each day: giving unsolicited advice; telling others about their approach; trying to get other conductors to program their compositions; revealing intensely personal details about their job and themselves; telling hundreds of anecdotes; and so forth. But succeeding as a choir director requires 100% commitment. There just isn’t time to spend hours on social media every day! And then such people wonder why their choirs sound bad…

When it comes to “stealing,” I try to steal from the very best. For instance, here’s a fabulous polyphonic extension I stole from Father Francisco Guerrero (d. 1599). The congregation sings the first part, and at the end there’s a little ‘extension’ which our priest really likes. Our volunteer choir sang that on Easter Sunday—in front of 580 people!—and they did a fine job:

*  Mp3 Download • SANCTUS EXTENSION (Guerrero)

When I arrived in Michigan during the summer of 2024, Saint Mary’s did not have a choir. My heart is filled with joy to hear this group singing polyphony so well.

➕ Reason #5
Reluctance to Record

Very few choir directors are willing to record their choir singing—and then go back and learn from it. This is especially true when it comes to musicians who consider themselves “ultra-traditionalists.” Even when they only have 1-2 singers, they insist on singing enormously lengthy pieces like the TRACT on Lent’s 1st Sunday (Qui Hábitat In Adjutório Altíssimi). I’ve heard such performances; and most are ghastly. It’s not enough to simply “get through the notes.” A piece like that demands an artistic rendering by skilled singers. If such people would listen to a recording of themselves singing at Mass, they’d agree that what they’re doing is actually hurting (not helping) sacred music. But very few are willing to do that … which is a real shame. The Instruction on Sacred Music (“De Musica Sacra”) issued under Pope Pius XII on 3 September 1958 said:

It is better to do something well on a small scale than to attempt something elaborate without sufficient resources to do it properly.

Consider this excerpt from Easter Sunday, as sung by our volunteer choir:

*  Mp3 Download • “This is the day the Lord has made”

Even a brief little section like that requires meticulous rehearsal, allowing each phrase to have shape, finesse, and direction.

➕ Reason #6
Lack of Variety

Some choir directors fail because they “didn’t realize what they were signing up for.” The director at a typical Catholic parish will be teaching singers whose expertise varies greatly. It’s not like singing in a conservatory choir, where everyone is a trained musician. Some of your singers will be brand new to music. Others will have sung in numerous choirs, for decades. The conscientious choirmaster must make each rehearsal enjoyable for every singer. Each singer must be challenged—though each is at a different level. Achieving success in this area is no small task. That’s why Sacred Music Symposium 2025 is dedicated to providing a whole bunch of crucial tips, strategies, and techniques to assist the conscientious choirmaster “in the trenches.”

Monsignor Robert Skeris always encouraged church musicians to attend the finest conservatory feasible for them. A professional music degree is important because “you don’t know what you don’t know.” At the same time, a degree—even a doctorate—is the beginning of one’s career. In other words, only after you earn your degree does the real work begin.2

How can you make sure your singers “keep coming back” for more? One key ingredient is a diversity of musical styles. At our church, we use: medieval music; plainsong; Renaissance polyphony; masterpieces by superb modern composers such as Kevin Allen; modern psalmody (such as the Chabanel Psalms); and so forth.

Sine Qua Non • The sine qua non of our choral program is the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal, which our singers love. Indeed, I’ve never heard congregational singing like I did on Easter Sunday, when 580 people were singing with gusto the English translation of Surrexit Christus Hodie.

We are adding more and more polyphony each week. On Easter Sunday, for the very first time, we sang an ALLELUIA by Palestrina. There were a few little imperfections—but it will improve with time:

*  Mp3 Download • PALESTRINA ALLELUIA (extension)
—The polyphony begins after the verse.

I wish you could have heard that final chord: it sounded absolutely glorious. Here is a picture of our volunteer choir taken by my wife after Easter Sunday Mass:

➕ Addendum
Not an exhaustive list

The list I compiled above isn’t exhaustive. I didn’t mention anything about the fact that most choirmasters aren’t paid a just wage. I also didn’t mention how (broadly speaking) the choirmaster is only given criticism; never appreciation. In other words: when the choir director does well, people are silent … but when somebody wants to complain, they “let loose” freely!

1 Indeed, we have a number of people who have become obsessed with attacking our blog. They spend their time attempting to defame us, spreading every lie you could possibly imagine. The odd thing is, this entire cadre consists of unmarried men—every last one of them—and I have no idea why that is. Perhaps we need to work with greater diligence to attract some “haters” who are female! I mention this not to elicit pity, but to remind readers that once you release your music on the internet, you must anticipate nasty comments. As Archbishop Sheen used to say: “A reputation is like a ball in an alley; once it gets rolling, everybody loves to kick it around.”
2 In and of itself, a degree is neutral. Its value depends on many factors. Three of the most execrable parish music programs I know are run by conductors who brag about their terminal degrees. On the other hand, some university programs—especially those with large orchestras, large bands, and huge faculties—are superb. Personally, I only know a handful of outstanding church musicians who didn’t graduate from the conservatory—in other words, it’s possible to succeed without a professional degree, but seems less likely.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Innsbruck Hymn Tune, Latin Mass Musical Diversity Last Updated: April 23, 2025

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
    EARS BEFORE truly revolutionary changes were introduced by the post-conciliar reformers, Evelyn Waugh wrote (on 16 August 1964) to John Cardinal Heenan: “I think that a vociferous minority has imposed itself on the hierarchy and made them believe that a popular demand existed where there was in fact not even a preference.” We ask the kind reader— indeed, we beg you—to realize that those of us born in the 1940s and 1950s had no cognizance of Roman activities during the 1960s and 1970s. We were concerned with making sure we had the day’s bus fare, graduating from high school, taking care of our siblings, learning a trade, getting a job, courting a spouse. We questioned neither the nuns nor the Church.1 Do not believe for one instant any of us were following the liturgical machinations of Cardinal Lercaro or Father Bugnini in real time. Setting The Stage • To never question or resist Church authorities is praiseworthy. On the other hand, when a scandalous situation persists for decades, it must be brought into focus. Our series will do precisely that as we discuss the Lectionary Scandal from a variety of angles. We don’t do this to attack the Catholic Church. Our goal is bringing to light what’s been going on, so it can be fixed once and for all. Our subject is extremely knotty and difficult to navigate. Its complexity helps explain why the situation has persisted for such a long time.2 But if we immediately get “into the weeds” we’ll lose our audience. Therefore, it seems better to jump right in. So today, we’ll explore the legality of selling these texts. A Word On Copyright • Suppose Susie modifies a paragraph by Edgar Allan Poe. That doesn’t mean ipso facto she can assert copyright on it. If Susie takes a picture of a Corvette and uses Photoshop to color the tires blue, that doesn’t mean she henceforth “owns” all Corvettes in America. But when it comes to Responsorial Psalm translations, certain parties have been asserting copyright over them, selling them for a profit, and bullying publishers vis-à-vis hymnals and missals. Increasingly, Catholics are asking whether these translations are truly under copyright—because they are identical (or substantially identical) to other translations.3 Example After Example • Our series will provide copious examples supporting our claims. Sometimes we’ll rely on the readership for assistance, because—as we’ve stressed—our subject’s history couldn’t be more convoluted. There are countless manuscripts (in Greek, Hebrew, and Latin) we don’t have access to, so it would be foolish for us to claim that our observations are somehow the ‘final word’ on anything. Nevertheless, we demand accountability. Catholics in the pews are the ones who paid for all this. We demand to know who specifically made these decisions (which impact every English-speaking Catholic) and why specifically certain decisions were made. The Responsorial Psalms used in America are—broadly speaking—stolen from the hard work of others. In particular, they borrowed heavily from Father Cuthbert Lattey’s 1939 PSALTER TRANSLATION:
    *  PDF Download • COMPARISON CHART —We thank the CCW staff for technical assistance with this graph.
    Analysis • Although certain parties have been selling (!!!) that translation for decades, the chart demonstrates it’s not a candidate for copyright since it “borrows” or “steals” or “rearranges” so much material from other translations, especially the 1939 translation by Father Cuthbert Lattey. What this means in layman’s terms is that individuals have been selling a translation under false pretenses, a translation they don’t own (although they claim to). To make RESTITUTION, all that money will have to be returned. A few years ago, the head of ICEL gave a public speech in which he said they give some of “their” profits to the poor. While almsgiving is a good thing, it cannot justify theft. Our Constant Theme • Our series will be held together by one thread, which will be repeated constantly: “Who was responsible?” Since 1970, the conduct of those who made a profit by selling these sacred texts has been repugnant. Favoritism was shown toward certain entities—and we will document that with written proof. It is absolutely essential going forward that the faithful be told who is making these decisions. Moreover, vague justifications can no longer be accepted. If we’re told they are “making the translations better,” we must demand to know what specifically they’re doing and what specific criteria they’re following. Stay Tuned • If you’re wondering whether we’ll address the forthcoming (allegedly) Lectionary and the so-called ABBEY PSALMS AND CANTICLES, have no fear. We’ll have much to say about both. Please stay tuned. We believe this will end up being the longest series of articles ever submitted to Corpus Christi Watershed. To be continued. ROBERT O’NEILL Former associate of Monsignor Francis “Frank” P. Schmitt at Boys Town in Nebraska JAMES ARNOLD Formerly associated w/ King’s College, Cambridge A convert to the Catholic Church, and distant relative of J. H. Arnold MARIA B. Currently serves as a musician in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charlotte. Those aware of the situation in her diocese won’t be surprised she chose to withhold her last name.
    1 Even if we’d been able to obtain Roman journals such as NOTITIAE, none of them contained English translations. But such an idea would never have occurred to a high school student or a college student growing up in the 1960s. 2 A number of shell corporations claim to own the various biblical translations mandated for Roman Catholics. They’ve made millions of dollars selling (!) these indulgenced texts. If time permits, we hope to enumerate these various shell corporations and explain: which texts they claim to own; how much they bring in each year; who runs them; and so forth. It would also be good to explore the morality of selling these indulgenced texts for a profit. Furthermore, for the last fifty years these organizations have employed several tactics to manipulate and bully others. If time permits, we will expose those tactics (including written examples). Some of us—who have been working on this problem for three decades—have amassed written documentation we’ll be sharing that demonstrates behavior at best “shady” and at worst criminal. 3 Again, we are not yet examining the morality of selling (!) indulgenced texts to Catholics mandated to use those same translations.
    —Guest Author
    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“The only really effective apologia for Christianity comes down to two arguments: namely, the _saints_ the Church has produced and the _art_ which has grown in her womb.”

— Josef Cardinal Ratzinger (Interview, 1985)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Flor Peeters In A Weird Mood?
  • Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
  • Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up