• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Is Investment in Sacred Music Really Necessary?

Dr. Samuel Backman · September 19, 2024

S A STUDENT OF MUSIC, I was frequently plagued with a sense of anxiety that the work I had set about was a disposable “extra” or nicety. It seemed to me that, while society would be crippled without farmers, physicians, construction workers, or engineers, there would be no such impact felt in the absence of musicians.1 One can survive only a short period of time without food, water, or medicine, I thought, but who knows how many years one could survive without live music! Furthermore, these thoughts were corroborated by many attitudes found in various corners of educational institutions. When universities face budgetary crises, music departments tend to be among the earliest casualties.

No Frills • In an ironic sense, my fear that the arts were disposable “extras” was spawned, in many ways, by certain trends in the fine arts themselves. The utilitarian ideologies that produced the Bauhaus and Brutalist movements have likewise engendered suspicion against any decorative elements that might adorn the raw material of the building. While this aesthetic philosophy can be understood as a reaction to some of the excesses of architecture in the preceding nineteenth century, it carried with a rejection of the “non-essential” or “decorative” elements not only in architecture, but in society writ large.

Waste Not, Want Not • It is no secret that the Church, in many quarters, was likewise plagued with tepidity toward beauty. One might indeed ask: if the Church exists for the salvation of souls, one might wonder, why spend so much money building beautiful churches and outfitting them with beautiful statuary and other furnishing? There is a temptation in our profit-driven, efficiency-driven climate to view the beautification of the liturgy as a sort of squandering or folly. From a more altruistic or noble vantagepoint, we might be tempted to view such beautification in a negative light for fear that it might lead us to neglect the poor needy. But, lest we think the pursuit of beauty in the worship of God is a waste, let us not forget the Judas Iscariot made this same accusation of Mary, sister of Lazarus, as she began to anoint Jesus’ feet with perfume: “Why was this oil not sold for three hundred days’ wages and given to the poor?” (John 12:5)

Judas’ Misreading of the Situation • At face value, Judas’ quip with Mary’s action might seem perfectly justified: think of how many people we could feed we sold that oil rather than pouring it out! Nevertheless, it is not Mary’s “frivolous” gesture the Jesus rebukes, but rather Judas’ reply. Here, Judas falls short is in his underestimation of the power and generosity of Jesus, who fed five thousand through the multiplication of loaves and fishes. It is not Jesus’ charity that is lacking, but Judas’ faith.

“Both/And” vs. “Either/Or” • There is a general tendency in Christian theology to reject the notion of “either/or” statements, but rather to favor “both/and” statements: Jesus Christ is both human and divine, God is both merciful and just, Mary is both virgin and mother, etc. Following suit, we are called both to give generously to the poor and to offer our first fruits in the right worship of Almighty God. And our God who has given us these duties will also provide us—or, has already provided us—the means to do both, for our God is a God of abundance and not of scarcity. It is our duty, as Christians to feed the poor and care for the sick, and it is no less our duty to offer God our first fruits through the act of Divine Worship.

Right Worship AND Care for the Poor • While the Corporal Works of Mercy (i.e. feeding the poor, sheltering the homeless, etc.) are a central part of our duty as Christians, the Church is by no means the only institution capable of doing such. However, when it comes to offering a foretaste of the heavenly banquet in liturgical worship, here, the Church has a unique “core competency.” While it is true that the Sacred Liturgy is, first and foremost a gift that is received from God rather than produced by man, it is important that we offer our first fruits through the act of Divine Worship, as this is the action to which we aspire for eternity. In heaven, the need for the Corporal Works of Mercy will cease, as there will no longer be any suffering to relieve. However, the spirit of charity in which these works are offered will live on in eternity through the act of Divine Worship, when we join the angelic hosts as foreseen by the prophet Isaiah: “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God of Hosts, heaven and earth are full of your glory.” (Isaiah 6:3)

The Liturgy: A Rehearsal For Heaven • The act of liturgical worship can be understood to be a kind of “rehearsal” for eternal worship of Almighty God in heaven. For this reason, the cultivation of Sacred Music is not an “extra” or a frivolity, but something central to our mission. Though the way that it is cultivated will differ greatly on the basis of location and resources, the purpose for which it is cultivated is a common thread throughout the whole Church: namely, to make the heavenly kingdom tangible even in our earthly sojourn.

“And All These Things Will Be Given You Besides” • In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus advises the crowds to “seek first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness,” and our earthly needs “will be given to [us] also.” (Matthew 6:33) Applying this passage to the cultivation of Sacred Music, I have seen it play out in so many different settings. It is no doubt a leap of faith for any parish to invest their already thinly-spread resources in this pursuit. However, the return on this investment is often substantial. I’ve heard colleagues cite the axiom the “a good music program pays for itself.” While I am not prepared to scientifically defend this from an actuarial standpoint, I have seen it play out time and again in practice! It goes without saying that we come to Mass for the Sacrament rather than the music, but nevertheless, our encounter with the Sacrament can and should be enriched by the presence of music. In many ways, a parish’s vitality (or lack thereof) is manifested in its approach to sacred music.

Covid, Livestreams, and the Unwavering Primacy of Divine Worship • I would like to conclude with a personal testimony of how an investment in sacred music—in a very uncertain time—paid off. As the year 2019 came to a close, who could have foreseen the events that would unfold in the first quarter of 2020. I, for one, would never have anticipated that our church buildings would be closed to the public, but so it was. In our city and diocese, we were allowed to have no more the ten people present in the building for the celebration of Holy Mass. Although we were not equipped with a livestream setup prior to the pandemic, we learned “on the fly” and garnered the necessary equipment to host a livestream. While many livestreams of Masses during this period took place within the confines of a small chapel (or office) with only a priest and cameraman, we made a commitment to having an organist and four (socially distanced) singers present for each livestream. Although congregational singing was prohibited, we furnished each Mass with polyphony, Gregorian Propers, and organ music. On the other side of the building, we always had as many altar servers as legally possible and continued to use incense. In short, we did not want to skimp on the act of Divine Worship, even though the circumstances were unusual.

About a year later, when many restrictions had been lifted and people came to Mass in person again, we saw quite an influx of new faces come into our parish. When asked how they found us at Holy Cross Catholic Church, many individuals cited that the livestreams provided them a sense of beauty and reverence that had been sorely missing in their lives at this time. I remain deeply thankful for the support and shared vision of the clergy and other leadership in our parish for their commitment to keeping sacred music a central component in this trying time. If ever there were a time where one was tempted to regard sacred music as a “frivolity,” this was it. Nevertheless, it proved to be a stalwart beacon of God’s constancy amid. Though our earthly lives are wrought with ebbs and flows, peaks and troughs, we must remember that the angelic choirs never cease to exclaim: “Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God of Hosts, heaven and earth are full of your glory.”

1 I don’t need to remind the readers of this blog about how our government would later divide Americans into “essential” and “non-essential” workers.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: September 19, 2024

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Samuel Backman

Samuel earned degrees at Saint Olaf College, Yale University, and the University of Oklahoma. He resides with his wife in Minneapolis, Minnesota.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Impelled by the weightiest of reasons, we are fully determined to restore Latin to its position of honor, and to do all We can to promote its study and use. The employment of Latin has recently been contested in many quarters, and many are asking what the mind of the Apostolic See is in this matter. We have therefore decided to issue the timely directives contained in this document, so as to ensure that the ancient and uninterrupted use of Latin be maintained and, where necessary, restored.”

— Pope John XXIII (22 February 1962)

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.