• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Gregorian Rhythm Wars • “Jeff’s First Response to Patrick” (12 Nov 2022)

Jeff Ostrowski · November 12, 2022

M  Gregorian Rhythm Wars contains all
M  previous installments of our series.

ECAUSE OUR TOPIC is massive and sprawling, some repetition will be unavoidable. (I beg our readers to tolerate it.) However, my dear Mr. Williams, I think you would agree we must repudiate the politician’s habit of giving “non-answers” to each other’s questions, reverting instead to our talking points. The readers will become bored if we talk past each other. When our exchange ends, I hope I’ll be able to say: “Patrick Williams believes XYZ.” I’m not promising I’ll agree—but I seek to learn what you believe.

(#1) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you cite a 16 May 2015 article in which I wrote: “It’s not forbidden to sing from ancient manuscripts […] and this was done by the Sistine Chapel during papacy of Pius X.”

My Response: My intention—in spite of what some people claim—is not to condemn anyone’s performance practice. My intention is to prove: (a) There is an official edition, which has its own rhythm; (b) The “Pothier Style” is, broadly speaking, the same way Catholics sang for 700+ years.

(#2) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you wrote: “I challenge you to show where Dom Mocquereau claimed that the primitive and universal rhythmic tradition was lost due to mass hallucination. As far as I can tell, the claim of ‘mass hallucination’ is a straw man of my colleague’s own creation.”

My Response: I don’t claim Mocquereau said such a thing verbatim. In that sentence, I was attempting to give a summary of what people like Dom Mocquereau believe. They claim—unless I’m very much mistaken—there was once a universal rhythmic tradition that was ‘forgotten’ or ‘abandoned’ or ‘messed up’ circa 1050AD, yet the same scribes who ‘forgot’ or ‘abandoned’ or ‘messed up’ that universal rhythmic tradition transmitted the pitches with incredible accuracy.

(#3) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you said you don’t see where the 2022 USCCB Newsletter says “Gregorian chants of Mass parts and Propers must be taken from the pre-Conciliar Graduale Romanum.”

My Response: I was merely attempting to emphasize that—even now—the USCCB liturgical committee ‘promotes’ or ‘endorses’ or ‘doesn’t consign to oblivion’ the Editio Vaticana. As you know the 1970 ORDO CANTUS MISSAE doesn’t have any plainsong of its own (except the occasional aberration). Rather, it directs the user to Abbat Pothier’s Editio Vaticana—a.k.a. “the greatest, most spectacular, most powerful, most sublime, catastrophically-breathtaking edition of plainsong ever created.”

OU HAVE SEEN, Mr. Williams, how I’ve answered three of your questions without obfuscation. I’ve not yet responded to all your assertions, but I’m confused why you wrote two separate articles—001 + 002—whereas I tried to narrow the discussion to what I deemed “our specimen.” For the sake of our readers, I beg you: slow down. Let’s take one thing at a time! I challenge you to be restrained in your next article, and deal with the following. You wrote on the CCW facebook page:

“I pointed out Jeff’s misreading of Chartres 47. Two more of his examples, 3823auvergne|1119 and 1132Limoges|1085, write four longs at the beginning of propitiatio, the exact opposite of what he claims. He also claimed that the flex (clivis) at iniquitates is identical with the two at propitiatio in 1087cluniacensem|1087, StMaur|1079, and 857noyon|1057. They sure don’t look identical to me! Examine and judge for yourself.”

Patrick, I feel your astute observations are worthy of a thoughtful response—which I’ll now provide.

To remind everybody what we’re discussing, “our specimen” comes from the the INTROIT for the 22nd Sunday after Pentecost. [Ordinary Form: 28th Sunday in Ordinary Time.] Specifically, we’re talking about the word propitiátio shown here:

* Let me be absolutely clear: It’s easy to verify that none of the 20+ diastematic manuscripts I cited in my inaugural article have an elogation on those instances of the “flex” by comparing other words in the same chant of the same manuscript (such as observáveris or iniquitátes) or a different chant from the same manuscript. Needless to say, sometimes it’s necessary to turn to the next folio or scroll up (or down) the page to find an apples-to-apples comparison. You correctly point out I goofed by implying iniquitátes is the only word that proves this. I apologize for that—and I’m sure it won’t be the last typo I make! Even Father Fortescue sometimes made typos. But that tiny goof does not change my argument one iota. As I demonstrate below, if iniquitátes doesn’t work in a particular example, simply look to a different word … such as observáveris. These examples will make it clear:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 1087cluniacensem|1087. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about StMaur|1079. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 857noyon|1057. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 3823auvergne|1119. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 1132Limoges|1085. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

Mr. Williams, I ask you to directly respond to the following two (2) questions:

11 November A • I have now demonstrated I was correct about the examples (3823auvergne|1119 • 1132Limoges|1085 • 1087cluniacensem|1087 • StMaur|1079 • 857noyon|1057), whereas you said I was wrong about those examples. Do you admit that none of those examples show an elongation on “our specimen” How many manuscripts, Mr. Williams, did I present in my first article? Wasn’t the number close to thirty? Shall I go through all thirty manuscripts in the same way I went through the ones shown above?

11 November B • Mr. Williams, you have accused me of “misreading” 47chartres|957. You claim the notes I’ve indicated (below) with green arrows should be elongated:

Question: What evidence do you have demonstrating that I’m wrong? Don’t say: “Cardine says so.” After all, many of Cardine’s assertions have been discredited. I’m asking for evidence. Can you please provide some?

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Gregorian Rhythm Wars Last Updated: December 6, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 27th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 5 October 2025, which is the 27th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the spectacular feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. Readers will want to check out the ENTRANCE CHANT posted there, which has a haunting melody (in the DEUTERUS MODE) and extremely powerful text.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Kids’ Choir Sings Thomas Aquinas
    Last Sunday, a children’s choir I’m teaching sang with us for the very first time at Sunday Mass. Females from our main choir sang along with them. If you’re curious to hear how they sounded, you can listen to a ‘live’ recording. That’s an English version of TANTUM ERGO by Saint Thomas Aquinas. That haunting melody is called GAUFESTRE and was employed for this 2-Voice Arrangement of a special hymn for 9 November (“Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica in Rome”) which replaces a Sunday this year.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of September (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“There are no hymns, in this sense, till the fourth century; they were not admitted to the Roman office till the twelfth. No Eastern rite to this day knows this kind of hymn. Indeed, in our Roman rite we still have the archaic offices of the last days of Holy Week and of the Easter octave, which—just because they are archaic—have no hymns.”

— Adrian Fortescue (25 March 1916)

Recent Posts

  • “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
  • Involving Women in the Communion?
  • “Toward a More Sacred Style With Pastoral Charity” • Guest Article by Dr. Myrna Keough
  • “Music List” • 27th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
  • Kids’ Choir Sings Thomas Aquinas

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.