• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

We’re a 501(c)3 public charity established in 2006. We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and run no advertisements. We exist solely by the generosity of small donors.

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Gregorian Rhythm Wars • “Jeff’s First Response to Patrick” (12 Nov 2022)

Jeff Ostrowski · November 12, 2022

M  Gregorian Rhythm Wars contains all
M  previous installments of our series.

ECAUSE OUR TOPIC is massive and sprawling, some repetition will be unavoidable. (I beg our readers to tolerate it.) However, my dear Mr. Williams, I think you would agree we must repudiate the politician’s habit of giving “non-answers” to each other’s questions, reverting instead to our talking points. The readers will become bored if we talk past each other. When our exchange ends, I hope I’ll be able to say: “Patrick Williams believes XYZ.” I’m not promising I’ll agree—but I seek to learn what you believe.

(#1) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you cite a 16 May 2015 article in which I wrote: “It’s not forbidden to sing from ancient manuscripts […] and this was done by the Sistine Chapel during papacy of Pius X.”

My Response: My intention—in spite of what some people claim—is not to condemn anyone’s performance practice. My intention is to prove: (a) There is an official edition, which has its own rhythm; (b) The “Pothier Style” is, broadly speaking, the same way Catholics sang for 700+ years.

(#2) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you wrote: “I challenge you to show where Dom Mocquereau claimed that the primitive and universal rhythmic tradition was lost due to mass hallucination. As far as I can tell, the claim of ‘mass hallucination’ is a straw man of my colleague’s own creation.”

My Response: I don’t claim Mocquereau said such a thing verbatim. In that sentence, I was attempting to give a summary of what people like Dom Mocquereau believe. They claim—unless I’m very much mistaken—there was once a universal rhythmic tradition that was ‘forgotten’ or ‘abandoned’ or ‘messed up’ circa 1050AD, yet the same scribes who ‘forgot’ or ‘abandoned’ or ‘messed up’ that universal rhythmic tradition transmitted the pitches with incredible accuracy.

(#3) “Low-Hanging Fruit” • Mr. Williams, you said you don’t see where the 2022 USCCB Newsletter says “Gregorian chants of Mass parts and Propers must be taken from the pre-Conciliar Graduale Romanum.”

My Response: I was merely attempting to emphasize that—even now—the USCCB liturgical committee ‘promotes’ or ‘endorses’ or ‘doesn’t consign to oblivion’ the Editio Vaticana. As you know the 1970 ORDO CANTUS MISSAE doesn’t have any plainsong of its own (except the occasional aberration). Rather, it directs the user to Abbat Pothier’s Editio Vaticana—a.k.a. “the greatest, most spectacular, most powerful, most sublime, catastrophically-breathtaking edition of plainsong ever created.”

OU HAVE SEEN, Mr. Williams, how I’ve answered three of your questions without obfuscation. I’ve not yet responded to all your assertions, but I’m confused why you wrote two separate articles—001 + 002—whereas I tried to narrow the discussion to what I deemed “our specimen.” For the sake of our readers, I beg you: slow down. Let’s take one thing at a time! I challenge you to be restrained in your next article, and deal with the following. You wrote on the CCW facebook page:

“I pointed out Jeff’s misreading of Chartres 47. Two more of his examples, 3823auvergne|1119 and 1132Limoges|1085, write four longs at the beginning of propitiatio, the exact opposite of what he claims. He also claimed that the flex (clivis) at iniquitates is identical with the two at propitiatio in 1087cluniacensem|1087, StMaur|1079, and 857noyon|1057. They sure don’t look identical to me! Examine and judge for yourself.”

Patrick, I feel your astute observations are worthy of a thoughtful response—which I’ll now provide.

To remind everybody what we’re discussing, “our specimen” comes from the the INTROIT for the 22nd Sunday after Pentecost. [Ordinary Form: 28th Sunday in Ordinary Time.] Specifically, we’re talking about the word propitiátio shown here:

* Let me be absolutely clear: It’s easy to verify that none of the 20+ diastematic manuscripts I cited in my inaugural article have an elogation on those instances of the “flex” by comparing other words in the same chant of the same manuscript (such as observáveris or iniquitátes) or a different chant from the same manuscript. Needless to say, sometimes it’s necessary to turn to the next folio or scroll up (or down) the page to find an apples-to-apples comparison. You correctly point out I goofed by implying iniquitátes is the only word that proves this. I apologize for that—and I’m sure it won’t be the last typo I make! Even Father Fortescue sometimes made typos. But that tiny goof does not change my argument one iota. As I demonstrate below, if iniquitátes doesn’t work in a particular example, simply look to a different word … such as observáveris. These examples will make it clear:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 1087cluniacensem|1087. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about StMaur|1079. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 857noyon|1057. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 3823auvergne|1119. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

In direct response to your assertion (above), I stand by what I said about 1132Limoges|1085. Please help me understand how you can doubt what is clearly shown here:

Mr. Williams, I ask you to directly respond to the following two (2) questions:

11 November A • I have now demonstrated I was correct about the examples (3823auvergne|1119 • 1132Limoges|1085 • 1087cluniacensem|1087 • StMaur|1079 • 857noyon|1057), whereas you said I was wrong about those examples. Do you admit that none of those examples show an elongation on “our specimen” How many manuscripts, Mr. Williams, did I present in my first article? Wasn’t the number close to thirty? Shall I go through all thirty manuscripts in the same way I went through the ones shown above?

11 November B • Mr. Williams, you have accused me of “misreading” 47chartres|957. You claim the notes I’ve indicated (below) with green arrows should be elongated:

Question: What evidence do you have demonstrating that I’m wrong? Don’t say: “Cardine says so.” After all, many of Cardine’s assertions have been discredited. I’m asking for evidence. Can you please provide some?

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Gregorian Rhythm Wars Last Updated: December 6, 2022

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Luis Martínez Must Go!
    Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!
    A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Booklet of Eucharistic Hymns” (16 pages)
    I was asked to create a booklet for my parish to use during our CORPUS CHRISTI PROCESSION on 22 June 2025. Would you be willing to look over the DRAFT BOOKLET (16 pages) I came up with? I tried to include a variety of hymns: some have a refrain; some are in major, others in minor; some are metered, others are plainsong; some are in Spanish, some are in Latin, but most are in English. Normally, we’d use the Brébeuf Hymnal—but we can’t risk having our congregation carry those heavy books all over the city to various churches.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“In my opinion, there should be reached the aim that all priests could continue to use the old Missal.”

— ‘Cardinal Ratzinger, Letter to Wolfgang Waldstein (14 December 1976)’

Recent Posts

  • Hidden Gem: Ascendit Deus (Dalitz)
  • PDF Download • Soprano Descant — “Hail, Holy Queen Enthroned Above”
  • “Dom Jausions had a skilled hand. His transcriptions are masterpieces of neatness & precision.”
  • Pope Leo XIV pays tribute to Palestrina
  • PDF Download • Palestrina’s “Ave Maria”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up