• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

“Homily for the Feast of Christ the King” (EF) • Father Valentine Young, OFM

Jeff Ostrowski · October 25, 2020

The following is by Father Valentine Young, OFM, a faithful Catholic priest who died on 17 January 2020. It was delivered sometime between 2013 and 2020. To learn more about Father Valentine, please scroll to the bottom of the page.

Feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ, King

*  PDF Download • READINGS IN ENGLISH
—(1962 Missal) Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

HEN POPE PIUS XI introduced this “Feast of Christ the King” into the Liturgical calendar in 1925, he explicitly stated that it should be on the Last Sunday in October. That way the Feast would always be on the Sunday before the Feast of All Saints on November 1 and the Commemoration of the Faithful departed on Nov. 2. He thereby was trying to emphasize that Christ was not only the King of the Church on earth, but also of the Kingdom of the Blessed in heaven and the souls in purgatory.

Christ’s Kingdom on earth: In our theological courses in the seminary—well over fifty, and even sixty years ago for me—we were taught that the Catholic Church was Christ’s Kingdom here on earth. And that is what we as Catholics are privileged to belong to while we are on this earth.

A consequence: A consequence of this fact is that if we abandon the Catholic Church, then we are abandoning Christ himself. Now, Our Lord Jesus Christ—in many of His parables and teachings—let us know that His Kingdom on earth was always what I am going to call “an unfinished product.” In other words, it would always be in need of improvement and growth, especially in its members.

Proof of history: The history of Christ’s Kingdom on earth has always been subject to ups and downs. And right now—at least for the Church in Europe and it seems in almost all of the Americas—we are now in a period of “downs” in many respects. I was again reminded of this this past week when I heard that the beautiful closed Saint Mark Church on Montgomery Avenue in Evanston was going to be converted into a recreation center.

Speaking in a human way: I am now going to speak in somewhat of a human way. But let me ask: “How do you think Christ the King must think when He sees this happening?” It certainly is a sign that His kingdom on earth is dwindling, at least in certain places. Now I will not point the finger at anyone to say what I think may be the cause for this decline. But I don’t think anyone can deny the fact.

Vatican II: I will go out on a limb and say that I think the misinterpretation of the Second Vatican Council is one of the main reasons why Christ’s Church or Kingdom on earth is in the state it is. Time doesn’t allow me to go into any great detail to prove or show what I mean. But when one reads the actual documents of this council, and now looks around and sees how they were implemented, one has to say that they were greatly misinterpreted and at times even contradicted.

Other developments: The same can be said about other more recent developments in the Church. In some respects we can say that Christ entrusted the Church (or “His Kingdom on earth”) to human beings with a free will. And not all human beings use their free will in the way God intended.

No excuse for leaving: But that is no excuse for leaving. In fact it is all the more reason for Christ’s faithful followers to stay within His kingdom and work all the harder. Our Faith tells us that there is a devil, and that this devil is opposed to Christ the King and His Church, and to everything that Christ stands for. And yes; in some respects the devil is stronger and smarter than we are. That is why at least in some instances it seems that the devil is winning.

Christ’s promise: But on the other hand we have Christ’s word that He would not abandon us or “leave us as orphans.” The solution to the problem is simple: Each and every one of us has to do what God puts in front of us to do. And we don’t have to worry or get upset about the possible outcome. In our own day and age, we have such a wonderful example in the (now Saint) Teresa of Calcutta. She certainly had many problems that she had to face in her life. Working for the poor is not always an easy or satisfying task. She must have been guided by the advice which she left for us, namely: “God does not expect us to be successful; He just wants us to remain faithful.” +

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Valentine Young SERMON Last Updated: October 25, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • 9 Nov. (Dedic. Lateran)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 9 November 2025, which is the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the sensational feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

At the Catholic gathering (Katholikentag) held at Breslau in August, the Papal Nuncio celebrated Mass for 80,000 participants, facing the people (the “Missa versus populum”).

— “Orate Fratres” Magazine (23 Jan. 1927)

Recent Posts

  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing
  • What surprised me about regularly singing the Gloria in Latin

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.