• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Catholic Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Are Choirmasters Allowed To Have A Bad Day?

Jeff Ostrowski · November 26, 2019

80746-valdimir-horowitz-rach-3-in-1941 LADIMIR HOROWITZ was certainly among the greatest virtuosi of all time. From a purely musical standpoint, he never reached the level of Josef Hofmann, but when Horowitz was in his prime—1928 to 1953—his technique and repeated notes were comparable (perhaps) to Hofmann’s. Moreover, some recordings by Horowitz have never been surpassed: e.g. his Sousa March, his improvements to the Liszt Hungarian Second, his Chopin op. 55 no. 2, his Mendelssohn-Liszt Wedding Variations, and so on. With regard to Rachmaninov’s 3rd Concerto, Horowitz was responsible for its extreme popularity today. Vladimir reached the pinnacle of his career on 4 May 1941 in Carnegie Hall. With Sir John Barbirolli conducting, he played the D Minor Piano Concerto (“Rach3”) with the New York Philharmonic, and a secret recording was made. For years, this was a rare collector’s item, since it was “pirated.” In the late 1990s, I received a cassette copy from Dr. Ates Tanin in Canada—which I guarded with my life—but today the entire performance can be heard on YouTube. By 1941, Horowitz had been playing Rach3 for 23 years, since he claims to have begun learning it when he was 15 or 16. 1 The 1941 performance has never been surpassed: not by Argerich, not by Rachmaninov, not by Gieseking, not by Horowitz himself. At the very end, a man in the audience yells “Bravo,” and this was truly a glorious moment. 2

AS A MUSIC DIRECTOR, have you ever had a bad day? During Mass, have you been disappointed by your playing, or conducting, or your choir’s singing? At times like that, remember that even someone as stupendous as Horowitz occasionally has bad days. Indeed, one of his 1983 concerts was particularly bad—with tons of memory lapses, incoherencies, and wrong notes. For this concert alone, Horowitz received more than $1 million dollars: an insanely high fee in the 1980s. Listen to an excerpt from that concert:

    * *  Mp3 Download • 1983 Concert (“Live”) by Horowitz

For purposes of comparison, here’s the same piece, recorded “live” when I was in high school:

    * *  Mp3 Download • 1999 Concert (“Live”) by Jeff Ostrowski

Needless to say, the skill of Horowitz is not in question; when he was in grade school, Horowitz could play better than I ever will. The point is, everyone has bad days.

Next time something goes really wrong, remember that 1983 concert by Horowitz.

Say to yourself: “Nobody is perfect!”  And make it better next time.



NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   He was born around 1903 somewhere in the Ukraine. I say “around” because there are serious discrepancies regarding his birthplace (Berdychiv vs. Kiev) and—for a long time—the year of his birth. For example, when he made his debut in Germany (1926), he pretended to be 20 years old, because it made his skills seem more impressive, even though he was actually about 23. Most of the official books placed his birth year at 1904, but eventually Horowitz admitted that he lied about the true year (1903) to avoid military service in the Soviet Union. Indeed, Horowitz often lied during interviews later in life, and finding the truth can be difficult. Horowitz even lied about the recording of his famous “Historic Return” to Carnegie Hall in 1965: the “live” recording of the Schumann Fantasy Coda was secretly doctored, with wrong notes repaired.

2   When you have time, read the story of Sir John Barbirolli, Albert Victor Alexander, and Winston Churchill during WWII—it’s fascinating.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

Jeff Ostrowski

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Los Angeles.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

Surprising Popularity!

One of our most popular downloads has proven to be the organ accompaniment to “The Monastery Hymnal” (131 pages). This book was compiled, arranged, and edited by Achille P. Bragers, who studied at the Lemmensinstituut (Belgium) about thirty years before that school produced the NOH. Bragers might be considered an example of Belgium “Stile Antico” whereas Flor Peeters and Jules Van Nuffel represented Belgium “Prima Pratica.” You can download the hymnal by Bragers at this link.

—Jeff Ostrowski
15 February 2021 • To Capitalize…?

In the Introit for the 6th Sunday after Pentecost, there is a question regarding whether to capitalize the word “christi.” The Vulgata does not, because Psalm 27 is not specifically referring to Our Lord, but rather to God’s “anointed one.” However, Missals tend to capitalize it, such as the official 1962 Missal and also a book from 1777 called Missel de Paris. Something tells me Monsignor Knox would not capitalize it.

—Jeff Ostrowski
15 February 2021 • “Sung vs. Spoken”

We have spoken quite a bit about “sung vs. spoken” antiphons. We have also noted that the texts of the Graduale Romanum sometimes don’t match the Missal texts (in the Extraordinary Form) because the Mass Propers are older than Saint Jerome’s Vulgate, and sometimes came from the ITALA versions of Sacred Scripture. On occasion, the Missal itself doesn’t match the Vulgate—cf. the Introit “Esto Mihi.” The Vulgate has: “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in domum refúgii…” but the Missal and Graduale Romanum use “Esto mihi in Deum protectórem et in locum refúgii…” The 1970s “spoken propers” use the traditional version, as you can see.

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

There is a lack of that kind of organization which favors mature judgment. Move on, move on, get it out. Schemata are multiplied without ever arriving at a considered form. The system of discussion is bad … Often the schemata arrive just before the discussions. Sometimes, and in important matters, such as the new anaphoras, the schema was distributed the evening before the discussion was to take place … Father Bugnini has only one interest: press ahead and finish.

— Cardinal Antonelli (Peritus during the Second Vatican Council)

Recent Posts

  • (Screenshots) • Proving Holy Saturday Took Place In The Morning
  • “Homily: Second Sunday of Lent” • Father Valentine Young, OFM
  • Part 2 • “Starting Your Own Traditional Latin Mass”
  • Is This Really The Same Church??
  • Solmization from the Inside

Copyright © 2021 Corpus Christi Watershed · Charles Garnier on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.