• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The American Idolization of Liturgy

Andrew R. Motyka · January 7, 2015

EOPLE WHO KNOW ME won’t be surprised to hear that I’m a pretty opinionated person. My mother-in-law has said before that I have opinions about things that she never even considered having opinions about. What I’m trying to say is that I’m a big fat raging hypocrite for what I’m about to write.

When American Idol premiered in 2002, it was a wild sensation, a new way for people to get involved in selecting the winners of talent competitions. My main objection, as a snobby music major in college, was that it was the hoi polloi choosing the winners instead of people that knew anything at all about music (yes, I’m still a little miffed about Taylor Hicks). Obviously, the entire point of the public voting system was getting the public to select the artist that they thought was the best, and hence which singer from whom they would purchase the most albums when they made it big.

It annoyed me, though, that sometimes better singers were passed over for better looking ones, or ones that slickly packaged themselves, or just sang a song that everyone liked better. Shouldn’t people who know a little bit about music and singing be the ones whose opinions count? Why did everyone hate Simon Cowell (okay, he was a jerk, but the dude knew what he was talking about, for the most part)?

If you spend any more than 0.75 seconds on the Catholic blogosphere, you are bound to wade into liturgical issues. Whether it’s people complaining about the Evil Cardinal Burke and his weaponized Cappa Magna, or the elusive Clown Mass that everyone seems to have suffered through yet no one has ever attended, the rhetoric gets heated, and every single person, from the musician to the priest to the average lay person, has an opinion about the liturgy. Some want it to be silent, some want the traditional music of the Church, and some want something “more upbeat and modern.” Everyone has an opinion.

My gut reaction to all of this is the same as Snobby College Andy. Why does everyone need to have an opinion, especially when so few people actually know a single thing as to what they’re talking about? Even when I agree with so many commentators, the sheer number of them drowns out the articulate voices that can actually make a difference. Hook all of that noise up to the internet microphone and it’s a cacophony of opinion, each shouting down the opposition and frequently bayoneting their own allies. We have priests and musicians trying to do their best to render glory to God in the liturgy, and many people in the pews ready to text their vote to the number that best criticizes anything in their local Mass. It can be maddening.

he other day, though, I had a truly great conversation with a close friend about our faith. He has gone back and forth on the Catholic Church for some time, and is working out his faith the best he can (would that we could all be as self critical and honest). One thing he mentioned to me was that, the last time he attended Mass, he was bothered by how few people seemed to really grasp the importance of what was happening in front of them, like they weren’t taking it very seriously at all. They were going through the motions without any idea of what they were doing. I think his frustration touches on something very real, and much more important than our conversations over one song versus another.

Liturgy, like music, has a direct impact on us personally, emotionally, and spiritually. Even though the average person can’t readily articulate what it is that makes him like his favorite American Idol contestant, he knows that he connects in some way to the performance. In the same way, liturgy affects each of us, even if don’t quite know why. We have opinions about our local Mass because we know what we like, and even more importantly, we know that we need to be fed.

Of course, the sacramental presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is enough, from a strictly grace-viewed standpoint, to fill us completely. But as I’ve said before, disposition is important when receiving the sacraments. Of people leaving the Church today, most of them say it’s because they aren’t being spiritually fed, a figure echoed in the tremendously important book on evangelization, Forming Intentional Disciples. While there are many avenues that need to be traveled to help feed people, we aren’t doing any favors by cheapening the liturgy. A sacramental grace that falls on a poorly disposed heart can die quickly, and a dead heart has a difficult time evangelizing. And if we aren’t evangelizing, we’re doing something wrong.

So maybe it’s not a bad thing that everyone has an opinion about liturgy. Maybe it’s that our frustrations with worship are symptomatic of something more: that we’re not being fed properly. We aren’t being drawn into a relationship with Jesus Christ first, which comes before any liturgical expression, musical or otherwise. If we can enrich that relationship, the liturgical pieces will come much easier. Remember that without that interior reality first, the exterior expression is just a show, subject to the text message voting and Nielson Family Ratings that turn the liturgical experience into just another consumer product.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Download • “Offertory” for this Sunday
    This coming Sunday, 12 October 2025, is the 28th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). Its OFFERTORY ANTIPHON (PDF) is gorgeous, and comes from the book of Esther, as did the ENTRANCE CHANT last Sunday. Depending on a variety of factors, various hand-missals (all with Imprimatur) translate this passage differently. For instance, “príncipis” can be rendered: King; Prince; Lion; or Fierce lord. None is “more correct” than another. It depends on what each translator wants to emphasize and which source text is chosen. All these pieces of plainsong are conveniently stored at the blue-ribbon feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF example) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Pope Gelasius in his 9th Letter to the Bishops of Lucania condemned the evil practice which had been introduced of women serving the priest at the celebration of Mass. Since this abuse had spread to the Greeks, Innocent IV strictly forbade it in his letter to the Bishop of Tusculum: “Women should not dare to serve at the altar; they should be altogether refused this ministry.” We too have forbidden this practice in the same words in Our oft-repeated constitution “Etsi Pastoralis” (§6, #21)

— Pope Benedict XIV • Encyclical “Allatae Sunt” (26 July 1755)

Recent Posts

  • Every Diocesan Music Commission Should Do This
  • Exclusive Interview • “Púeri Cantóres” President
  • PDF Download • “Offertory” for this Sunday
  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.