• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Organists: Know Thy Sheep!

Richard J. Clark · October 3, 2014

HIS PAST SUMMER, the National Convention of the American Guild of Organists was held in Boston. I was privileged to be part of a panel discussion called The Future of the Organ in Contemporary Worship. While directed to organists who work for many denominations, a number of universal truths apply.

The organ’s use in worship is often in survival mode and its supremacy is no longer a given. How do we keep it alive in the face of so many challenges to shut it down? Much of what I spoke about during the convention, I have already written about here.

Despite what Vatican II has to say about the use of the pipe organ in liturgy, that “In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem…” (Sacrosanctum Concilium §120) it is wise have an awareness of how those in our congregations view the pipe organ and their experience of it during the liturgy. We must know our sheep! Not that one should ever plan liturgy according to popular decree, it is helpful to know where our congregations stand, so we can do a better job in meeting them where they are. Once we do that, we can better cultivate and advocate for the pipe organ in liturgy, just as we do for Gregorian Chant and singing the mass.

Realize that when it comes to music in liturgy, everyone is an expert. In part I am being facetious, but since music directly affects everyone quite personally, people are in fact experts regarding their own experiences. We must take this seriously. People know what they like and what they don’t like. They know how they feel. Therefore, it’s imperative to know where your congregation is at so that you can meet them there. Only then can you gently challenge and uplift.

LSO ON THIS AGO PANEL DISCUSSION was my esteemed colleague, Bernadette Colley, Director of Music and Organist at the Church of Our Redeemer in Lexington, Massachusetts. Prior to the convention she worked exceptionally hard to poll her congregation, obtaining as large a sample as possible. She brought her expertise as founder of Colley Consulting, a research consultancy specializing in arts education policy. While hers is not a Roman Catholic environment, her results may reveal some familiar and universal traits.

In a follow-up article for her congregation, Bernadette wrote about this poll:

(The) responses were both enlightening and informative in conveying…the ways in which congregants themselves express their relationship to the pipe organ as an element of meaningful worship. Audience members (at the convention) were interested to hear how congregation members articulated their relationship to the organ as an element of worship.

Here were her questions and results. Does any of this sound familiar?

1 • To what extent does the pipe organ’s inclusion as a worship component influence
the quality of your worship experience?

Answers centered on themes of:
  a) Purpose/Substance, e.g. organ viewed as a connector to “worship” “church” “history”
  b) Degree: e.g. ranging from organ greatly enhances, to not enhances, to detracts
  c) Reasons, e.g. adjectives associated with organ such as “Meditative, Rich, Beautiful, Powerful, Humble, Full, Awesome, Majestic, Prayerful, and Quiet”

2 • Describe the best and worst aspects of having the pipe organ, or an alternative instrument, (piano or guitar); accompany hymns in worship services…

a) Regarding the pipe organ –
  i. Best: Organ’s timbre; history; good for “old hymns”; its “power” or “fullness”
  ii. Worst: Organ is: too loud; too expensive; can be muddled/slow

b) Regarding the piano and/or guitar –
  i. Best: Both good for “contemporary” styles of, e.g., folk, spiritual, because of their “warmth” “intimacy” “informality”
  ii. Worst: Ranging from: instruments are thin, can’t provide as much “leadership”; no sense of tradition; to “not suitable at ALL in church”

3 • To what extent do organ solos as preludes, instrumental interludes, and postludes, enhance or detract from your worship experience?

  Most respondents felt instrumental solos were an enhancement; a few said “take them or leave them”. The functions that these serve in worship included: communication, mood setting, music appreciation, ritual lubrication, and allowing for introspection with God.

4 • If you could send a recommendation, request, or piece of advice to church
organists about the future of their profession, what would it be?

  In general, messages suggested organists: “Diversify” OR “Advocate for your instrument”
OR both.

5 • How important is it, do you feel, for newly built worship spaces to include pipe
organs? Please explain.

  Some respondents felt it essential, some not at all, and a number said it depends on the
individual congregation’s discernment of the issue.

HERE DOES YOUR CONREGATION STAND with regards to the pipe organ? What can you do to cultivate a more positive response? I believe the key question posed by Bernadette was essentially this: To what extent does the pipe organ influence the quality of your worship experience?

The pipe organ is there to serve the liturgy, not the other way around. The organ is in service to prayer. Organists must be supremely mindful of this. I will try to remember this myself.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Pipe Organ Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
    I have argued that the OFFERTORY—at least in its ancient form—is more of a responsory than an antiphon. The 1962 Missal specifically calls it “Antiphona ad Offertorium.” From now on, I plan to use this beautiful setting (PDF) at funerals, since it cleverly inserts themes from the absolution of the body. Tons more research needs to be done on the OFFERTORY, which often is a ‘patchwork’ stitching together various beginnings and endings of biblical verses. For instance, if you examine the ancient verses for Dómine, vivífica me (30th Sunday in Ordinary Time) you’ll discover this being done in a most perplexing way. Rebecca Maloy published a very expensive book on the OFFERTORY, but it was a disappointment. Indeed, I can’t think of a single valuable insight contained in her book. What a missed opportunity!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
    As a RECESSIONAL on All Souls’ Day (November 2nd), we will sing In Paradísum Dedúcant Te Ángeli (PDF). When it comes to Gregorian Chant, this is one of the most popular “songs.” Frankly, all the prayers and chants from the traditional REQUIEM MASS (Missa exsequialis or Missa pro defunctis) are incredibly powerful and never should’ve been scuttled. Click here to hear “In Paradisum” in a recording I made this afternoon. Professor Louis Bouyer spoke of the way Bugnini “scuttled the office of the dead” in this fascinating excerpt from his memoirs. In his book, La riforma litugica (1983), Bugnini bragged—in quite a shameful way—about eliminating the ancient funeral texts, and even admitted those venerable texts were “beloved” (his word) by Catholics.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • All Souls (2 November)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 2 November 2025, which is the Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (“All Souls”). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the top-notch feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. In my humble opinion, it’s weird to have the feast of All Saints on a Sunday. No wonder the close associate of Pope Saint Paul VI said the revised KALENDAR was “the handiwork of a trio of maniacs.” However, I can’t deny that sometimes the sacred liturgy consists of elements that are seemingly contradictory: e.g. the Mode 7 “De Profúndis” ALLELUIA, or the Mode 8 “Dulce lignum” ALLELUIA on the various ancient feasts of the Holy Cross (3 May, 14 September, and so on).
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

In the ’60s, I thought this emphasis on congregational singing was to encourage good Catholic hymns like “Immaculate Mary” and so forth … but after the Council, they threw them out, too!

— ‘Fr. Valentine Young, OFM (2007)’

Recent Posts

  • Never Work For A Priest Or Bishop Who Believes Sacred Music Should Be “Entertainment”
  • When Pilgrims Sing, the World Disappears
  • “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
  • “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
  • The Beauty of the Propers for All Souls’ Day (and the Requiem Mass)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.